Slash and burn and fires in Indonesia: a comment

A paper published in Ecological Economics [Varma, A. 2003. The economics of slash and burn: a case study of the 1997–1998 Indonesian forest fires. Ecological Economics 46,159–171] claims to show that slash and burn agriculture is socially inefficient and should be banned. However, its conclusions an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tacconi, L., Vayda, A.P.
Formato: Journal Article
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/19353
_version_ 1855541050775437312
author Tacconi, L.
Vayda, A.P.
author_browse Tacconi, L.
Vayda, A.P.
author_facet Tacconi, L.
Vayda, A.P.
author_sort Tacconi, L.
collection Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace)
description A paper published in Ecological Economics [Varma, A. 2003. The economics of slash and burn: a case study of the 1997–1998 Indonesian forest fires. Ecological Economics 46,159–171] claims to show that slash and burn agriculture is socially inefficient and should be banned. However, its conclusions and recommendations are flawed. It defines slash and burn agriculture too broadly and misrepresents the nature and causes of the 1997–98 fires by virtue of attributing them entirely to slash and burn agriculture. Its economic assessment of the costs of the fires is also problematic. The recommendations to ban land-clearing fires and to provide alternative livelihoods to slash and burn farmers cannot be supported.
format Journal Article
id CGSpace19353
institution CGIAR Consortium
language Inglés
publishDate 2006
publishDateRange 2006
publishDateSort 2006
record_format dspace
spelling CGSpace193532025-01-24T14:20:53Z Slash and burn and fires in Indonesia: a comment Tacconi, L. Vayda, A.P. fires shifting cultivation agriculture economics assessment A paper published in Ecological Economics [Varma, A. 2003. The economics of slash and burn: a case study of the 1997–1998 Indonesian forest fires. Ecological Economics 46,159–171] claims to show that slash and burn agriculture is socially inefficient and should be banned. However, its conclusions and recommendations are flawed. It defines slash and burn agriculture too broadly and misrepresents the nature and causes of the 1997–98 fires by virtue of attributing them entirely to slash and burn agriculture. Its economic assessment of the costs of the fires is also problematic. The recommendations to ban land-clearing fires and to provide alternative livelihoods to slash and burn farmers cannot be supported. 2006 2012-06-04T09:09:22Z 2012-06-04T09:09:22Z Journal Article https://hdl.handle.net/10568/19353 en Tacconi, L., Vayda, A.P. 2006. Slash and burn and fires in Indonesia: a comment . Ecological Economics 56 (1) :1-4. ISSN: 0921-8009.
spellingShingle fires
shifting cultivation
agriculture
economics
assessment
Tacconi, L.
Vayda, A.P.
Slash and burn and fires in Indonesia: a comment
title Slash and burn and fires in Indonesia: a comment
title_full Slash and burn and fires in Indonesia: a comment
title_fullStr Slash and burn and fires in Indonesia: a comment
title_full_unstemmed Slash and burn and fires in Indonesia: a comment
title_short Slash and burn and fires in Indonesia: a comment
title_sort slash and burn and fires in indonesia a comment
topic fires
shifting cultivation
agriculture
economics
assessment
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/19353
work_keys_str_mv AT tacconil slashandburnandfiresinindonesiaacomment
AT vaydaap slashandburnandfiresinindonesiaacomment