Disturbing hypotheses in tropical forests
The intermediate disturbance hypothesis (IDH) is a controversial explanation for the maintenance of tropical forest tree diversity, but empirical tests of it are rare. Two data intensive evaluations have recently yielded contradictory outcomes: one for and one against the IDH. This article proposes...
| Autores principales: | , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Journal Article |
| Lenguaje: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
2003
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/18576 |
Ejemplares similares: Disturbing hypotheses in tropical forests
- Defining and defending Connell's intermediate disturbance hypothesis: A response to Fox
- Long-term observations of rain forest succession, tree diversity and responses to disturbance
- Tropical rain forest recovery after cyclone and human activity on Savai'i, Samoa : a field study of tree species composition and distribution
- Does the disturbance hypothesis explain the biomass increase in basin-wide Amazon forest plot data?
- Effects of management and disturbance gradients on a bird fauna in Chitwan National Park and its Buffer zone
- Aerial Bud Bank and Structural Changes of Woody Species from Argentine Chaco in Response to Disturbances
