Playing games in the forest: state-local conflicts of land appropriation

This paper explores possible strategic interactions between the state and local community in games of tropical forest land appropriation. Three typical cases are discussed, corresponding to a development over time of increased resource competition and market integration. The local response to more s...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Angelsen, A.
Format: Journal Article
Language:Inglés
Published: 2001
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/18159
_version_ 1855514685652074496
author Angelsen, A.
author_browse Angelsen, A.
author_facet Angelsen, A.
author_sort Angelsen, A.
collection Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace)
description This paper explores possible strategic interactions between the state and local community in games of tropical forest land appropriation. Three typical cases are discussed, corresponding to a development over time of increased resource competition and market integration. The local response to more state deforestation depends on the costs, market, and behavioral assumptions, and less on the structure of the game (Cournot or Stackelberg). The state fuels local deforestation by providing infrastructure (roads) which reduces the net costs of agricultural expansion, or when markets are imperfect and local behavior determined by survival needs. The game structure is, however, important for total deforestation.
format Journal Article
id CGSpace18159
institution CGIAR Consortium
language Inglés
publishDate 2001
publishDateRange 2001
publishDateSort 2001
record_format dspace
spelling CGSpace181592025-01-24T14:11:56Z Playing games in the forest: state-local conflicts of land appropriation Angelsen, A. deforestation communities game theory models resource allocation land use land clearance government conservation conflicts costs markets tropical forests This paper explores possible strategic interactions between the state and local community in games of tropical forest land appropriation. Three typical cases are discussed, corresponding to a development over time of increased resource competition and market integration. The local response to more state deforestation depends on the costs, market, and behavioral assumptions, and less on the structure of the game (Cournot or Stackelberg). The state fuels local deforestation by providing infrastructure (roads) which reduces the net costs of agricultural expansion, or when markets are imperfect and local behavior determined by survival needs. The game structure is, however, important for total deforestation. 2001 2012-06-04T09:06:09Z 2012-06-04T09:06:09Z Journal Article https://hdl.handle.net/10568/18159 en Angelsen, A. 2001. Playing games in the forest: state-local conflicts of land appropriation . Land Economics 77 (2) :285-299. ISSN: 0023-7639.
spellingShingle deforestation
communities
game theory
models
resource allocation
land use
land clearance
government
conservation
conflicts
costs
markets
tropical forests
Angelsen, A.
Playing games in the forest: state-local conflicts of land appropriation
title Playing games in the forest: state-local conflicts of land appropriation
title_full Playing games in the forest: state-local conflicts of land appropriation
title_fullStr Playing games in the forest: state-local conflicts of land appropriation
title_full_unstemmed Playing games in the forest: state-local conflicts of land appropriation
title_short Playing games in the forest: state-local conflicts of land appropriation
title_sort playing games in the forest state local conflicts of land appropriation
topic deforestation
communities
game theory
models
resource allocation
land use
land clearance
government
conservation
conflicts
costs
markets
tropical forests
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/18159
work_keys_str_mv AT angelsena playinggamesintheforeststatelocalconflictsoflandappropriation