Territorial mechanisms and scaling processes for climate-smart agriculture in Guatemala

Guatemala’s agricultural sector faces persistent challenges linked to climate variability, soil degradation, and the high vulnerability of smallholder production systems, particularly in hillside areas and the Dry Corridor. In this context, climate-smart agriculture has emerged as a key approach to...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Borrayo, Andrea, Lizarazo, Miguel, Martinez, Deissy, Garcia, Jorge Octavio, Diaz, Anabell, Jimenez, Benancio, van Loon, Jelle, Carranza, Carlos, Hidalgo, Lisandro, García, Marcelo
Format: Informe técnico
Language:Inglés
Published: 2025
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/180627
Description
Summary:Guatemala’s agricultural sector faces persistent challenges linked to climate variability, soil degradation, and the high vulnerability of smallholder production systems, particularly in hillside areas and the Dry Corridor. In this context, climate-smart agriculture has emerged as a key approach to strengthen resilience, stabilize productivity, and improve food security. However, its sustained adoption depends largely on the presence of territorial mechanisms that connect actors, infrastructure, and information to support informed and context-specific decision-making processes. This document systematizes and reorganizes evidence generated in Guatemala between 2023 and 2025 under the AgriLAC Resiliente initiative and the CGIAR Scaling for Impact (S4I) Science Program, with a focus on strengthening regional and local mechanisms and identifying entry points for scaling climate-smart agriculture. The analysis integrates evidence from innovation networks, territorial infrastructure, Local Technical Agroclimatic Committees (LTACs), agroclimatic bulletins, participatory research processes, and agronomic research platforms. Findings show that scaling is a non-linear and territorially differentiated process, shaped by the interaction of institutional arrangements, local capacities, operational infrastructure, and learning mechanisms. Innovation networks supported inter-institutional coordination and knowledge exchange, while territorial infrastructure enabled a gradual transition from technical validation to adoption under real production conditions. In parallel, LTACs and agroclimatic services strengthened the link between climate information and farm-level decision-making. Evidence from implemented practices, participatory trials with biofortified crops, and research platforms confirms that scaling potential varies according to the type of innovation, its technical complexity, and economic feasibility. Overall, the results highlight the importance of responsible, evidence-based, and context-sensitive scaling approaches that recognize territories as central spaces for climate adaptation and sustainable agricultural development in Guatemala.