Criteria and indicators for sustainable forest management: new findings from CIFOR's forest management unit level research
This paper traces the growing interest in the development of Criteria and Indicators for sustainable forest since the declaration of the 'Forest Principles' at the Rio Conference 1992. Several processes are underway in the different regions of the world to define sets of criteria and indicators that...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Artículo preliminar |
| Language: | Inglés |
| Published: |
1998
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/17937 |
| _version_ | 1855533426095947776 |
|---|---|
| author | Prabhu, Ravi Colfer, C.J.P. Shepherd, G. |
| author_browse | Colfer, C.J.P. Prabhu, Ravi Shepherd, G. |
| author_facet | Prabhu, Ravi Colfer, C.J.P. Shepherd, G. |
| author_sort | Prabhu, Ravi |
| collection | Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace) |
| description | This paper traces the growing interest in the development of Criteria and Indicators for sustainable forest since the declaration of the 'Forest Principles' at the Rio Conference 1992. Several processes are underway in the different regions of the world to define sets of criteria and indicators that can be used to assess the social, economic, and ecological sustainability of forest management. Some have focused more at national level, while others have emphasised information needs at the forest management unit level. In an attempt to produce a generic 'master set', the Center for Internetional Forestry research (CIFOR) has carried out several tests to compare the different sets of criteria and indicators currently existence. At the forest level, ecological criteria have been found much easier to apply than social ones as the latter often require an in-depth understanding of areas beyond the intermediate boundaries of the forest management unit. In an attempt to help people in different areas adapt the generic hierarchy of criteria and indicators to their own conditions, CIFOR is developing a computer programme, CIMAT, which allows for the addition of local knowledge and an iterative development of locally-specific criteria and indicators. In spite of the work still needed, the importance of defining a comprehensive but practical set of criteria and indicators lies in the fact that such a measurable and comparable methodology would build public confidence in the issue of forest sustainability. |
| format | Artículo preliminar |
| id | CGSpace17937 |
| institution | CGIAR Consortium |
| language | Inglés |
| publishDate | 1998 |
| publishDateRange | 1998 |
| publishDateSort | 1998 |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | CGSpace179372025-01-24T14:20:10Z Criteria and indicators for sustainable forest management: new findings from CIFOR's forest management unit level research Prabhu, Ravi Colfer, C.J.P. Shepherd, G. criteria forest management indicators cimat databases adaptation modification This paper traces the growing interest in the development of Criteria and Indicators for sustainable forest since the declaration of the 'Forest Principles' at the Rio Conference 1992. Several processes are underway in the different regions of the world to define sets of criteria and indicators that can be used to assess the social, economic, and ecological sustainability of forest management. Some have focused more at national level, while others have emphasised information needs at the forest management unit level. In an attempt to produce a generic 'master set', the Center for Internetional Forestry research (CIFOR) has carried out several tests to compare the different sets of criteria and indicators currently existence. At the forest level, ecological criteria have been found much easier to apply than social ones as the latter often require an in-depth understanding of areas beyond the intermediate boundaries of the forest management unit. In an attempt to help people in different areas adapt the generic hierarchy of criteria and indicators to their own conditions, CIFOR is developing a computer programme, CIMAT, which allows for the addition of local knowledge and an iterative development of locally-specific criteria and indicators. In spite of the work still needed, the importance of defining a comprehensive but practical set of criteria and indicators lies in the fact that such a measurable and comparable methodology would build public confidence in the issue of forest sustainability. 1998 2012-06-04T09:04:46Z 2012-06-04T09:04:46Z Working Paper https://hdl.handle.net/10568/17937 en Prabhu, R., Colfer, C.J.P., Shepherd, G. 1998. Criteria and indicators for sustainable forest management: new findings from CIFOR's forest management unit level research . Rural Development Forestry Network Paper (ODI) No.23a. 20p. |
| spellingShingle | criteria forest management indicators cimat databases adaptation modification Prabhu, Ravi Colfer, C.J.P. Shepherd, G. Criteria and indicators for sustainable forest management: new findings from CIFOR's forest management unit level research |
| title | Criteria and indicators for sustainable forest management: new findings from CIFOR's forest management unit level research |
| title_full | Criteria and indicators for sustainable forest management: new findings from CIFOR's forest management unit level research |
| title_fullStr | Criteria and indicators for sustainable forest management: new findings from CIFOR's forest management unit level research |
| title_full_unstemmed | Criteria and indicators for sustainable forest management: new findings from CIFOR's forest management unit level research |
| title_short | Criteria and indicators for sustainable forest management: new findings from CIFOR's forest management unit level research |
| title_sort | criteria and indicators for sustainable forest management new findings from cifor s forest management unit level research |
| topic | criteria forest management indicators cimat databases adaptation modification |
| url | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/17937 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT prabhuravi criteriaandindicatorsforsustainableforestmanagementnewfindingsfromciforsforestmanagementunitlevelresearch AT colfercjp criteriaandindicatorsforsustainableforestmanagementnewfindingsfromciforsforestmanagementunitlevelresearch AT shepherdg criteriaandindicatorsforsustainableforestmanagementnewfindingsfromciforsforestmanagementunitlevelresearch |