Soil carbon and nitrogen emissions under farmer managed conservation agriculture in Zimbabwe

Worldwide agriculture operates under the threefold challenge of adapting to climate change and mitigating its effects while aiming for sustainable agricultural intensification to meet the food demands of a growing population. Conservation agriculture (CA), a combination of reduced tillage, diversifi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Meyer zu Drewer, Johannes, Thierfelder, Christian, Buerkert, Andreas
Formato: Journal Article
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: Springer 2026
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/179018
_version_ 1855514982616137728
author Meyer zu Drewer, Johannes
Thierfelder, Christian
Buerkert, Andreas
author_browse Buerkert, Andreas
Meyer zu Drewer, Johannes
Thierfelder, Christian
author_facet Meyer zu Drewer, Johannes
Thierfelder, Christian
Buerkert, Andreas
author_sort Meyer zu Drewer, Johannes
collection Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace)
description Worldwide agriculture operates under the threefold challenge of adapting to climate change and mitigating its effects while aiming for sustainable agricultural intensification to meet the food demands of a growing population. Conservation agriculture (CA), a combination of reduced tillage, diversified crop rotations, and mulching, claims to target all three challenges at the same time. However, major knowledge gaps regarding CA’s mitigation potential remain. This study used a mobile, closed chamber system to determine soilborne, greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from rainfed, farmer-managed CA- and conventional agriculture (CONV), in northern Zimbabwe. Measurements were carried out in locations of contrasting soil fertility (Arenosols and Luvisols) and under contrasting environmental conditions (cold-dry, cold-moist, warm-dry, warm-moist). Additionally, a horizon-specific soil fractionation with consecutive soil carbon and nitrogen quantification was conducted. The GHG emissions from a total of 8 farms depended on soil temperature and moisture and tended to be higher in CONV fields, although differences were statistically not significant. Field emissions were highest under warm-moist conditions, which are prevailing for large parts of the growing season. Mean carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Luvisols were 3.0% lower in CA fields (583 mg CO2 m2 h−1) than under CONV (601 mg CO2 m2 h−1), respectively 7.6% lower in CA fields (464 mg CO2 m2 h−1) than under CONV (502 mg CO2 m2 h−1) in Arenosols. Conservation agriculture reduced mean nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions by 17.5% from 0.27 mg N2O m2 h−1 (CONV) to 0.23 mg N2O m2 h−1 (CA) in Luvisols and by 54.7% from 1.16 mg N2O m2 h−1 (CONV) to 0.53 mg N2O m2 h−1 (CA) in Arenosols. The upper soil horizons of Luvisols had higher concentrations of particulate- and mineral-associated organic matter compared with Arenosols and lower soil horizons but no differences were noted between management systems. Our data indicate that the mitigation effects of CA are highly site-specific and that CA management practices can have unexpected negative effects on GHG fluxes. The unimodal rainfall distribution with a long dry winter period of 7 months and recurrent dry spells in northern Zimbabwe may prevent a net carbon sequestration under CA management that would have occurred in the humid tropics.
format Journal Article
id CGSpace179018
institution CGIAR Consortium
language Inglés
publishDate 2026
publishDateRange 2026
publishDateSort 2026
publisher Springer
publisherStr Springer
record_format dspace
spelling CGSpace1790182025-12-19T02:01:14Z Soil carbon and nitrogen emissions under farmer managed conservation agriculture in Zimbabwe Meyer zu Drewer, Johannes Thierfelder, Christian Buerkert, Andreas carbon sequestration carbon sinks climate change mitigation greenhouse gas emissions zero tillage sustainable intensification Worldwide agriculture operates under the threefold challenge of adapting to climate change and mitigating its effects while aiming for sustainable agricultural intensification to meet the food demands of a growing population. Conservation agriculture (CA), a combination of reduced tillage, diversified crop rotations, and mulching, claims to target all three challenges at the same time. However, major knowledge gaps regarding CA’s mitigation potential remain. This study used a mobile, closed chamber system to determine soilborne, greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from rainfed, farmer-managed CA- and conventional agriculture (CONV), in northern Zimbabwe. Measurements were carried out in locations of contrasting soil fertility (Arenosols and Luvisols) and under contrasting environmental conditions (cold-dry, cold-moist, warm-dry, warm-moist). Additionally, a horizon-specific soil fractionation with consecutive soil carbon and nitrogen quantification was conducted. The GHG emissions from a total of 8 farms depended on soil temperature and moisture and tended to be higher in CONV fields, although differences were statistically not significant. Field emissions were highest under warm-moist conditions, which are prevailing for large parts of the growing season. Mean carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Luvisols were 3.0% lower in CA fields (583 mg CO2 m2 h−1) than under CONV (601 mg CO2 m2 h−1), respectively 7.6% lower in CA fields (464 mg CO2 m2 h−1) than under CONV (502 mg CO2 m2 h−1) in Arenosols. Conservation agriculture reduced mean nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions by 17.5% from 0.27 mg N2O m2 h−1 (CONV) to 0.23 mg N2O m2 h−1 (CA) in Luvisols and by 54.7% from 1.16 mg N2O m2 h−1 (CONV) to 0.53 mg N2O m2 h−1 (CA) in Arenosols. The upper soil horizons of Luvisols had higher concentrations of particulate- and mineral-associated organic matter compared with Arenosols and lower soil horizons but no differences were noted between management systems. Our data indicate that the mitigation effects of CA are highly site-specific and that CA management practices can have unexpected negative effects on GHG fluxes. The unimodal rainfall distribution with a long dry winter period of 7 months and recurrent dry spells in northern Zimbabwe may prevent a net carbon sequestration under CA management that would have occurred in the humid tropics. 2026-02 2025-12-18T20:44:39Z 2025-12-18T20:44:39Z Journal Article https://hdl.handle.net/10568/179018 en Open Access application/pdf Springer Meyer zu Drewer, J., Thierfelder, C., & Buerkert, A. (2025). Soil carbon and nitrogen emissions under farmer managed conservation agriculture in Zimbabwe. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 132(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-025-10451-3
spellingShingle carbon sequestration
carbon sinks
climate change mitigation
greenhouse gas emissions
zero tillage
sustainable intensification
Meyer zu Drewer, Johannes
Thierfelder, Christian
Buerkert, Andreas
Soil carbon and nitrogen emissions under farmer managed conservation agriculture in Zimbabwe
title Soil carbon and nitrogen emissions under farmer managed conservation agriculture in Zimbabwe
title_full Soil carbon and nitrogen emissions under farmer managed conservation agriculture in Zimbabwe
title_fullStr Soil carbon and nitrogen emissions under farmer managed conservation agriculture in Zimbabwe
title_full_unstemmed Soil carbon and nitrogen emissions under farmer managed conservation agriculture in Zimbabwe
title_short Soil carbon and nitrogen emissions under farmer managed conservation agriculture in Zimbabwe
title_sort soil carbon and nitrogen emissions under farmer managed conservation agriculture in zimbabwe
topic carbon sequestration
carbon sinks
climate change mitigation
greenhouse gas emissions
zero tillage
sustainable intensification
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/179018
work_keys_str_mv AT meyerzudrewerjohannes soilcarbonandnitrogenemissionsunderfarmermanagedconservationagricultureinzimbabwe
AT thierfelderchristian soilcarbonandnitrogenemissionsunderfarmermanagedconservationagricultureinzimbabwe
AT buerkertandreas soilcarbonandnitrogenemissionsunderfarmermanagedconservationagricultureinzimbabwe