The state of agricultural extension services in Sri Lanka, 2024-2025
We assess the state of Sri Lanka’s agricultural extension services using the BRIGHT 2024-2025 national survey. We examine use of or access to extension by land size and wealth, farmers’ trust in different providers, and farmers use of innovative sources of extension, including digital channels.. • F...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Brief |
| Language: | Inglés |
| Published: |
International Food Policy Research Institute
2025
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/178096 |
| _version_ | 1855535006986797056 |
|---|---|
| author | van Asselt, Joanna Weerasinghe, Krishani Hemachandra, Delini Jayaweera, Anuradha Munasinghe, Dilusha Headey, Derek D. |
| author_browse | Headey, Derek D. Hemachandra, Delini Jayaweera, Anuradha Munasinghe, Dilusha Weerasinghe, Krishani van Asselt, Joanna |
| author_facet | van Asselt, Joanna Weerasinghe, Krishani Hemachandra, Delini Jayaweera, Anuradha Munasinghe, Dilusha Headey, Derek D. |
| author_sort | van Asselt, Joanna |
| collection | Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace) |
| description | We assess the state of Sri Lanka’s agricultural extension services using the BRIGHT 2024-2025 national survey. We examine use of or access to extension by land size and wealth, farmers’ trust in different providers, and farmers use of innovative sources of extension, including digital channels..
• Fifty-five percent of Sri Lankan farmers accessed some form of extension in 2024/2025
• Public extension agents remain the most trusted source of advice, yet their reach differs sharply by region—from as high as 75% in North-Western Province to as low as 30% in Northern Province.
• Access to agricultural extension varies widely across provinces, with the highest access in Northern Province (84%) and the lowest in Central and Western Provinces (around 44%).
• In the Northern Province, despite low public provision, farmers compensate through strong reliance on input retailers (64%) and Farmers’ Organizations (71%), indicating robust informal ex-tension networks.
• Extension access is strongly related to cultivated area and asset ownership. Only 40% of farmers cultivating less than 0.5 acres received any form of extension, compared to 71% among those with more than 3 acres. Similarly, only 39% of households in the lowest wealth quintile accessed extension, compared to 62% in the highest quintile.
• Wealthier farmers and those with more cultivated acres not only access extension more frequently but also from a wider range of sources, underscoring inequality in information access and opportunity.
• Digital channels, such as Facebook and other online groups, play a growing but still limited role, concentrated mainly in the Western Province where internet access is strongest.
Policy Implications for Sri Lanka
• Targeted efforts are needed to expand extension access in lagging regions—particularly Central, Western, and Uva Provinces—by strengthening reach of both public and non-public agents.
• Dedicated actions are needed to expand extension services across a wider range of crops—particularly beyond rice and the traditional plantation sector—as well as across sub-sectors
• Given the high trust and engagement within farmer associations, these organizations should be leveraged as key partners for training delivery, group learning, and scaling up new practices.
• More research is needed on the effectiveness of different extension modalities, including digital |
| format | Brief |
| id | CGSpace178096 |
| institution | CGIAR Consortium |
| language | Inglés |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| publishDateRange | 2025 |
| publishDateSort | 2025 |
| publisher | International Food Policy Research Institute |
| publisherStr | International Food Policy Research Institute |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | CGSpace1780962025-11-22T02:12:26Z The state of agricultural extension services in Sri Lanka, 2024-2025 van Asselt, Joanna Weerasinghe, Krishani Hemachandra, Delini Jayaweera, Anuradha Munasinghe, Dilusha Headey, Derek D. agricultural extension extension programmes farmers policies We assess the state of Sri Lanka’s agricultural extension services using the BRIGHT 2024-2025 national survey. We examine use of or access to extension by land size and wealth, farmers’ trust in different providers, and farmers use of innovative sources of extension, including digital channels.. • Fifty-five percent of Sri Lankan farmers accessed some form of extension in 2024/2025 • Public extension agents remain the most trusted source of advice, yet their reach differs sharply by region—from as high as 75% in North-Western Province to as low as 30% in Northern Province. • Access to agricultural extension varies widely across provinces, with the highest access in Northern Province (84%) and the lowest in Central and Western Provinces (around 44%). • In the Northern Province, despite low public provision, farmers compensate through strong reliance on input retailers (64%) and Farmers’ Organizations (71%), indicating robust informal ex-tension networks. • Extension access is strongly related to cultivated area and asset ownership. Only 40% of farmers cultivating less than 0.5 acres received any form of extension, compared to 71% among those with more than 3 acres. Similarly, only 39% of households in the lowest wealth quintile accessed extension, compared to 62% in the highest quintile. • Wealthier farmers and those with more cultivated acres not only access extension more frequently but also from a wider range of sources, underscoring inequality in information access and opportunity. • Digital channels, such as Facebook and other online groups, play a growing but still limited role, concentrated mainly in the Western Province where internet access is strongest. Policy Implications for Sri Lanka • Targeted efforts are needed to expand extension access in lagging regions—particularly Central, Western, and Uva Provinces—by strengthening reach of both public and non-public agents. • Dedicated actions are needed to expand extension services across a wider range of crops—particularly beyond rice and the traditional plantation sector—as well as across sub-sectors • Given the high trust and engagement within farmer associations, these organizations should be leveraged as key partners for training delivery, group learning, and scaling up new practices. • More research is needed on the effectiveness of different extension modalities, including digital 2025-11-21 2025-11-21T20:38:28Z 2025-11-21T20:38:28Z Brief https://hdl.handle.net/10568/178096 en Open Access application/pdf International Food Policy Research Institute van Asselt, Joanna; Weerasinghe, Krishani; Hemachandra, Delini; Jayaweera, Anuradha; Munasinghe, Dilusha; and Headey, Derek D. 2025. The state of agricultural extension services in Sri Lanka, 2024-2025. BRIGHT Sri Lanka Project Note 2. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute. https://hdl.handle.net/10568/178096 |
| spellingShingle | agricultural extension extension programmes farmers policies van Asselt, Joanna Weerasinghe, Krishani Hemachandra, Delini Jayaweera, Anuradha Munasinghe, Dilusha Headey, Derek D. The state of agricultural extension services in Sri Lanka, 2024-2025 |
| title | The state of agricultural extension services in Sri Lanka, 2024-2025 |
| title_full | The state of agricultural extension services in Sri Lanka, 2024-2025 |
| title_fullStr | The state of agricultural extension services in Sri Lanka, 2024-2025 |
| title_full_unstemmed | The state of agricultural extension services in Sri Lanka, 2024-2025 |
| title_short | The state of agricultural extension services in Sri Lanka, 2024-2025 |
| title_sort | state of agricultural extension services in sri lanka 2024 2025 |
| topic | agricultural extension extension programmes farmers policies |
| url | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/178096 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT vanasseltjoanna thestateofagriculturalextensionservicesinsrilanka20242025 AT weerasinghekrishani thestateofagriculturalextensionservicesinsrilanka20242025 AT hemachandradelini thestateofagriculturalextensionservicesinsrilanka20242025 AT jayaweeraanuradha thestateofagriculturalextensionservicesinsrilanka20242025 AT munasinghedilusha thestateofagriculturalextensionservicesinsrilanka20242025 AT headeyderekd thestateofagriculturalextensionservicesinsrilanka20242025 AT vanasseltjoanna stateofagriculturalextensionservicesinsrilanka20242025 AT weerasinghekrishani stateofagriculturalextensionservicesinsrilanka20242025 AT hemachandradelini stateofagriculturalextensionservicesinsrilanka20242025 AT jayaweeraanuradha stateofagriculturalextensionservicesinsrilanka20242025 AT munasinghedilusha stateofagriculturalextensionservicesinsrilanka20242025 AT headeyderekd stateofagriculturalextensionservicesinsrilanka20242025 |