Towards more rigorous assessment of biodiversity
Biodiversity is often ill-defined and subjectively surveyed, resulting in inefficient and ambiguos estimates. Strengths and deficiencies of prevailing survey techniques are appraised through a review of selected literature. Analogies with forest inventory are used to suggest options for more efficie...
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Capítulo de libro |
| Lenguaje: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
1998
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/17794 |
Ejemplares similares: Towards more rigorous assessment of biodiversity
- The Rigor Revolution in Impact Assessment: Implications for CGIAR
- The rigor revolution: New standards of evidence for impact assessment of international agricultural research
- Summary for policymakers of the regional assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services for Africa of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services
- Are we there yet? The rigorousness of impact evaluations of nutrition-sensitive agricultural interventions
- Squaring the Circle Reconciling the Need for Rigor with the Reality on the Ground in Resilience Impact Assessment
- Criteria and indicators for assessing the sustainability of forest management: conservation of biodiversity