Evaluation of CGIAR GENDER Platform: Evidence Module Study
The Generating Evidence and New Directions for Equitable Results (GENDER) Platform began in early 2020, just prior to the COVID-19 pandemic. The Platform’s work is organized into three modules: Evidence, Methods, and Alliances. A rigorous analysis of the process and performance of each of the module...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Informe técnico |
| Language: | Inglés |
| Published: |
CGIAR Independent Advisory and Evaluation Service
2023
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/177060 |
| _version_ | 1855529827889577984 |
|---|---|
| author | Stathers, T. Forsythe, L. |
| author_browse | Forsythe, L. Stathers, T. |
| author_facet | Stathers, T. Forsythe, L. |
| author_sort | Stathers, T. |
| collection | Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace) |
| description | The Generating Evidence and New Directions for Equitable Results (GENDER) Platform began in early 2020, just prior to the COVID-19 pandemic. The Platform’s work is organized into three modules: Evidence, Methods, and Alliances. A rigorous analysis of the process and performance of each of the modules was undertaken during evaluation of the GENDER Platform (GP) in 2022-2023.
The Evaluation of CGIAR GENDER Platform: Evidence Module Study aims to identify and fill priority evidence gaps and improve the quantity and quality of gender-related evidence for topics of global interest. By doing so, the Evaluation Manager (EM) aims to promote the development of scalable intentional technologies and strategies to achieve gender-equitable development outcomes. It strives to position the GP as the go-to place for high-quality evidence and knowledge on equitable and sustainable food systems.
The EM began by mapping the evidence gaps and synthesizing the existing evidence. The EM then commissioned strategic research to address priority research gaps on women’s empowerment aiming to identify solutions and trajectories which reduce gender inequalities in agri-food systems. The EM works with a wide variety of partners who share mutual interests to achieve the intended outcomes. Aligned to the overall evaluation methodology, the EM evaluation used a mixed-methods approach involving a review of documents and media, targeted consultations with 28 key stakeholders, and selected findings from the online survey, which was conducted as part of the overall evaluation. |
| format | Informe técnico |
| id | CGSpace177060 |
| institution | CGIAR Consortium |
| language | Inglés |
| publishDate | 2023 |
| publishDateRange | 2023 |
| publishDateSort | 2023 |
| publisher | CGIAR Independent Advisory and Evaluation Service |
| publisherStr | CGIAR Independent Advisory and Evaluation Service |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | CGSpace1770602025-10-15T01:06:20Z Evaluation of CGIAR GENDER Platform: Evidence Module Study Stathers, T. Forsythe, L. gender evaluation The Generating Evidence and New Directions for Equitable Results (GENDER) Platform began in early 2020, just prior to the COVID-19 pandemic. The Platform’s work is organized into three modules: Evidence, Methods, and Alliances. A rigorous analysis of the process and performance of each of the modules was undertaken during evaluation of the GENDER Platform (GP) in 2022-2023. The Evaluation of CGIAR GENDER Platform: Evidence Module Study aims to identify and fill priority evidence gaps and improve the quantity and quality of gender-related evidence for topics of global interest. By doing so, the Evaluation Manager (EM) aims to promote the development of scalable intentional technologies and strategies to achieve gender-equitable development outcomes. It strives to position the GP as the go-to place for high-quality evidence and knowledge on equitable and sustainable food systems. The EM began by mapping the evidence gaps and synthesizing the existing evidence. The EM then commissioned strategic research to address priority research gaps on women’s empowerment aiming to identify solutions and trajectories which reduce gender inequalities in agri-food systems. The EM works with a wide variety of partners who share mutual interests to achieve the intended outcomes. Aligned to the overall evaluation methodology, the EM evaluation used a mixed-methods approach involving a review of documents and media, targeted consultations with 28 key stakeholders, and selected findings from the online survey, which was conducted as part of the overall evaluation. 2023-04-30 2025-10-14T12:08:45Z 2025-10-14T12:08:45Z Report https://hdl.handle.net/10568/177060 en https://iaes.cgiar.org/evaluation/publications/cgiar-gender-platform-evaluation-report Open Access application/pdf CGIAR Independent Advisory and Evaluation Service Stathers, T. and Forsythe, L. 2023. Evaluation of CGIAR GENDER Platform: Evidence Module Study. Rome: CGIAR Independent Advisory and Evaluation Service. |
| spellingShingle | gender evaluation Stathers, T. Forsythe, L. Evaluation of CGIAR GENDER Platform: Evidence Module Study |
| title | Evaluation of CGIAR GENDER Platform: Evidence Module Study |
| title_full | Evaluation of CGIAR GENDER Platform: Evidence Module Study |
| title_fullStr | Evaluation of CGIAR GENDER Platform: Evidence Module Study |
| title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of CGIAR GENDER Platform: Evidence Module Study |
| title_short | Evaluation of CGIAR GENDER Platform: Evidence Module Study |
| title_sort | evaluation of cgiar gender platform evidence module study |
| topic | gender evaluation |
| url | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/177060 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT statherst evaluationofcgiargenderplatformevidencemodulestudy AT forsythel evaluationofcgiargenderplatformevidencemodulestudy |