CGIAR Science Group Evaluations: Gender Equality and Social Inclusion
This sub-study was conducted under the umbrella of the independent evaluations of the three CGAR Science Group (SGs) (Portal), in accordance with the evaluation Terms of Reference (ToR). A designated evaluation question across SGs helped to identify further areas for further inquiry, providing an ov...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Informe técnico |
| Language: | Inglés |
| Published: |
CGIAR Independent Advisory and Evaluation Service
2025
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/177023 |
| _version_ | 1855535949440614400 |
|---|---|
| author | Sproule, Katie Podems, D. Negroustoueva, Svetlana |
| author_browse | Negroustoueva, Svetlana Podems, D. Sproule, Katie |
| author_facet | Sproule, Katie Podems, D. Negroustoueva, Svetlana |
| author_sort | Sproule, Katie |
| collection | Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace) |
| description | This sub-study was conducted under the umbrella of the independent evaluations of the three CGAR Science Group (SGs) (Portal), in accordance with the evaluation Terms of Reference (ToR). A designated evaluation question across SGs helped to identify further areas for further inquiry, providing an overview across the SGs and Initiatives: (1) approach and progress on GESI; (2) examples of achievements and challenges; and (3) lessons learned. Although the interview protocols included only one question specifically about gender and inclusion, the team analyzed responses to other thematic questions for implicit and indirect references to GSI and GDI issues. Additionally, inquiry considered alignment of the SG implementation to the CGIAR GDI Framework (2020): “teams that are more diverse and inclusive, consistently problem-solve more accurately and successfully on complex issues than homogenous ones."
Responsiveness to gender, diversity, and inclusion (GDI) is one of the 15 standards in the CGIAR-wide Evaluation Framework. It requires that GDI be fully integrated into the process of developing and conducting evaluations. Other related standards and principles include (1) ethics and equity; and (2) legitimacy and participation. Collectively, they highlight: (a) the importance of incorporating ethical and equity considerations into the design and execution of evaluations; and (b) the value of involving and consulting relevant informants during evaluations to ensure legitimacy, quality, and adequate representation.
Under the TORs, the key concepts of the study included: gender equality tagging and enhanced gender scoring (see section 3.1). Aligned with the mixed-methods design and in line with the CGIAR Evaluation Framework, each SG evaluation described a gender-responsive process that was inclusive, participatory, and respectful of stakeholders.
Several recommendations emerged from the SG evaluations, some echo previously made recommendations from the GENDER Platform evaluation (2023) and Synthesis of CRPs (2021). Together, recommendations, actions, and lessons learnt, aim to enhance GESI within CGIAR as it enters the next phase of its SPs and Accelerators-the new 2025-30 CGIAR Portfolio.
See SG evaluations portal and a related sub-study on Climate Change, and forthcoming review of Gender, Diversity and Inclusion/Culture and Engagement in CGIAR. |
| format | Informe técnico |
| id | CGSpace177023 |
| institution | CGIAR Consortium |
| language | Inglés |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| publishDateRange | 2025 |
| publishDateSort | 2025 |
| publisher | CGIAR Independent Advisory and Evaluation Service |
| publisherStr | CGIAR Independent Advisory and Evaluation Service |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | CGSpace1770232025-10-12T01:07:44Z CGIAR Science Group Evaluations: Gender Equality and Social Inclusion Sproule, Katie Podems, D. Negroustoueva, Svetlana gender analysis evaluation social inclusion This sub-study was conducted under the umbrella of the independent evaluations of the three CGAR Science Group (SGs) (Portal), in accordance with the evaluation Terms of Reference (ToR). A designated evaluation question across SGs helped to identify further areas for further inquiry, providing an overview across the SGs and Initiatives: (1) approach and progress on GESI; (2) examples of achievements and challenges; and (3) lessons learned. Although the interview protocols included only one question specifically about gender and inclusion, the team analyzed responses to other thematic questions for implicit and indirect references to GSI and GDI issues. Additionally, inquiry considered alignment of the SG implementation to the CGIAR GDI Framework (2020): “teams that are more diverse and inclusive, consistently problem-solve more accurately and successfully on complex issues than homogenous ones." Responsiveness to gender, diversity, and inclusion (GDI) is one of the 15 standards in the CGIAR-wide Evaluation Framework. It requires that GDI be fully integrated into the process of developing and conducting evaluations. Other related standards and principles include (1) ethics and equity; and (2) legitimacy and participation. Collectively, they highlight: (a) the importance of incorporating ethical and equity considerations into the design and execution of evaluations; and (b) the value of involving and consulting relevant informants during evaluations to ensure legitimacy, quality, and adequate representation. Under the TORs, the key concepts of the study included: gender equality tagging and enhanced gender scoring (see section 3.1). Aligned with the mixed-methods design and in line with the CGIAR Evaluation Framework, each SG evaluation described a gender-responsive process that was inclusive, participatory, and respectful of stakeholders. Several recommendations emerged from the SG evaluations, some echo previously made recommendations from the GENDER Platform evaluation (2023) and Synthesis of CRPs (2021). Together, recommendations, actions, and lessons learnt, aim to enhance GESI within CGIAR as it enters the next phase of its SPs and Accelerators-the new 2025-30 CGIAR Portfolio. See SG evaluations portal and a related sub-study on Climate Change, and forthcoming review of Gender, Diversity and Inclusion/Culture and Engagement in CGIAR. 2025-07-30 2025-10-11T18:48:44Z 2025-10-11T18:48:44Z Report https://hdl.handle.net/10568/177023 en https://iaes.cgiar.org/evaluation/publications/cgiar-science-group-evaluations-climate-change Open Access application/pdf CGIAR Independent Advisory and Evaluation Service Sproule, K., Podems, D., Negroustoueva, S. and Science Group Evaluation Teams. 2025. CGIAR Science Groups Evaluations: Gender Equality and Social Inclusion. Rome: CGIAR Independent Advisory and Evaluation Service. |
| spellingShingle | gender analysis evaluation social inclusion Sproule, Katie Podems, D. Negroustoueva, Svetlana CGIAR Science Group Evaluations: Gender Equality and Social Inclusion |
| title | CGIAR Science Group Evaluations: Gender Equality and Social Inclusion |
| title_full | CGIAR Science Group Evaluations: Gender Equality and Social Inclusion |
| title_fullStr | CGIAR Science Group Evaluations: Gender Equality and Social Inclusion |
| title_full_unstemmed | CGIAR Science Group Evaluations: Gender Equality and Social Inclusion |
| title_short | CGIAR Science Group Evaluations: Gender Equality and Social Inclusion |
| title_sort | cgiar science group evaluations gender equality and social inclusion |
| topic | gender analysis evaluation social inclusion |
| url | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/177023 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT sproulekatie cgiarsciencegroupevaluationsgenderequalityandsocialinclusion AT podemsd cgiarsciencegroupevaluationsgenderequalityandsocialinclusion AT negroustouevasvetlana cgiarsciencegroupevaluationsgenderequalityandsocialinclusion |