Partnerships: Summary of Evaluative Learning on CGIAR’s Ways of Working
The summary learning study was developed under the System Council-endorsed Multi-Year Evaluation Plan (MYEP) (2025-27 Workplan for IAES (SC/M21/DP5)). This study synthesizes findings and evidence behind the 31 partnership-related recommendations made in the eight CGIAR Portfolio evaluations between...
| Autores principales: | , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Informe técnico |
| Lenguaje: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
CGIAR Independent Advisory and Evaluation Service
2025
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/177020 |
| _version_ | 1855536206150893568 |
|---|---|
| author | Coccia, Federica Asare, Edwin Howard, Julie |
| author_browse | Asare, Edwin Coccia, Federica Howard, Julie |
| author_facet | Coccia, Federica Asare, Edwin Howard, Julie |
| author_sort | Coccia, Federica |
| collection | Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace) |
| description | The summary learning study was developed under the System Council-endorsed Multi-Year Evaluation Plan (MYEP) (2025-27 Workplan for IAES (SC/M21/DP5)). This study synthesizes findings and evidence behind the 31 partnership-related recommendations made in the eight CGIAR Portfolio evaluations between 2021-24 (see Table 4). The most recent 2024 Science Group (SG) evaluations make up the report’s strong foundation.1
The study aims to inform alignment with the 2024 Engagement Framework for the CGIAR Portfolio 2025-30 through evaluative recommendations2 and support improved evaluability against this 2024 Framework, in advance of the evaluation of partnerships planned for 2027 (2025-27 Workplan for IAES (SC/M21/DP5)).
Findings and conclusions follow the structure of the 2022 Engagement Framework to highlight progress and remaining constraints towards implementing the 2024 Framework principles and the forthcoming strategy. They are grouped into seven areas: 1) Institutionalization; 2) Resources; 3) Alignment and co-design; 4) Collaboration and contribution; 5) Capacity building; 6) Private sector cooperation; and 7) Advocacy. Evaluative evidence from the four platforms, Evaluability Assessments (EAs) and the three SGs indicate that CGIAR made significant strides to help operationalize partnership principles and improve coordination at national and regional levels, supported by mechanisms such as the Regional Integrated Initiatives (RIIs) and appointment of regional directors and country convenors. Download for full insights. |
| format | Informe técnico |
| id | CGSpace177020 |
| institution | CGIAR Consortium |
| language | Inglés |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| publishDateRange | 2025 |
| publishDateSort | 2025 |
| publisher | CGIAR Independent Advisory and Evaluation Service |
| publisherStr | CGIAR Independent Advisory and Evaluation Service |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | CGSpace1770202025-10-12T01:07:48Z Partnerships: Summary of Evaluative Learning on CGIAR’s Ways of Working Coccia, Federica Asare, Edwin Howard, Julie partnerships CGIAR learning The summary learning study was developed under the System Council-endorsed Multi-Year Evaluation Plan (MYEP) (2025-27 Workplan for IAES (SC/M21/DP5)). This study synthesizes findings and evidence behind the 31 partnership-related recommendations made in the eight CGIAR Portfolio evaluations between 2021-24 (see Table 4). The most recent 2024 Science Group (SG) evaluations make up the report’s strong foundation.1 The study aims to inform alignment with the 2024 Engagement Framework for the CGIAR Portfolio 2025-30 through evaluative recommendations2 and support improved evaluability against this 2024 Framework, in advance of the evaluation of partnerships planned for 2027 (2025-27 Workplan for IAES (SC/M21/DP5)). Findings and conclusions follow the structure of the 2022 Engagement Framework to highlight progress and remaining constraints towards implementing the 2024 Framework principles and the forthcoming strategy. They are grouped into seven areas: 1) Institutionalization; 2) Resources; 3) Alignment and co-design; 4) Collaboration and contribution; 5) Capacity building; 6) Private sector cooperation; and 7) Advocacy. Evaluative evidence from the four platforms, Evaluability Assessments (EAs) and the three SGs indicate that CGIAR made significant strides to help operationalize partnership principles and improve coordination at national and regional levels, supported by mechanisms such as the Regional Integrated Initiatives (RIIs) and appointment of regional directors and country convenors. Download for full insights. 2025-04-30 2025-10-11T17:39:06Z 2025-10-11T17:39:06Z Report https://hdl.handle.net/10568/177020 en https://iaes.cgiar.org/evaluation/publications/partnerships-evaluative-learning-ways-working-cgiar Open Access application/pdf CGIAR Independent Advisory and Evaluation Service Coccia, F., Asare, E. and Howard, J. 2025. Partnerships: Summary of Learning on CGIAR’s Ways of Working 2021-2024. Rome: CGIAR Independent Advisory and Evaluation Service. |
| spellingShingle | partnerships CGIAR learning Coccia, Federica Asare, Edwin Howard, Julie Partnerships: Summary of Evaluative Learning on CGIAR’s Ways of Working |
| title | Partnerships: Summary of Evaluative Learning on CGIAR’s Ways of Working |
| title_full | Partnerships: Summary of Evaluative Learning on CGIAR’s Ways of Working |
| title_fullStr | Partnerships: Summary of Evaluative Learning on CGIAR’s Ways of Working |
| title_full_unstemmed | Partnerships: Summary of Evaluative Learning on CGIAR’s Ways of Working |
| title_short | Partnerships: Summary of Evaluative Learning on CGIAR’s Ways of Working |
| title_sort | partnerships summary of evaluative learning on cgiar s ways of working |
| topic | partnerships CGIAR learning |
| url | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/177020 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT cocciafederica partnershipssummaryofevaluativelearningoncgiarswaysofworking AT asareedwin partnershipssummaryofevaluativelearningoncgiarswaysofworking AT howardjulie partnershipssummaryofevaluativelearningoncgiarswaysofworking |