Evaluating forest growth models

Effective model evaluation is not a single, simple procedure, but comprises several interrelated steps that cannot be separated from each other or from the purpose and process of model construction. We draw attention to several statistical and graphical procedures that may assist in model calibratio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vanclay, J.K., Skovsgaard, J.P.
Formato: Journal Article
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: 1997
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/17641
_version_ 1855521277715939328
author Vanclay, J.K.
Skovsgaard, J.P.
author_browse Skovsgaard, J.P.
Vanclay, J.K.
author_facet Vanclay, J.K.
Skovsgaard, J.P.
author_sort Vanclay, J.K.
collection Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace)
description Effective model evaluation is not a single, simple procedure, but comprises several interrelated steps that cannot be separated from each other or from the purpose and process of model construction. We draw attention to several statistical and graphical procedures that may assist in model calibration and evaluation, with special emphasis on those useful in forest growth modeling. We propose a five-step framework to examine logic and bio-logic, statistical properties, characteristics of errors, residuals, and sensitivity analyses. Empirical evaluations may be made with data used in fitting the model, and with additional data not previously used. We emphasize that the validity of conclusions drawn from all these assessments depends on the validity of assumptions underlying both the model and the evaluation. These principles should be kept in mind throughout model construction and evaluation.
format Journal Article
id CGSpace17641
institution CGIAR Consortium
language Inglés
publishDate 1997
publishDateRange 1997
publishDateSort 1997
record_format dspace
spelling CGSpace176412025-01-24T14:12:33Z Evaluating forest growth models Vanclay, J.K. Skovsgaard, J.P. growth models forests Effective model evaluation is not a single, simple procedure, but comprises several interrelated steps that cannot be separated from each other or from the purpose and process of model construction. We draw attention to several statistical and graphical procedures that may assist in model calibration and evaluation, with special emphasis on those useful in forest growth modeling. We propose a five-step framework to examine logic and bio-logic, statistical properties, characteristics of errors, residuals, and sensitivity analyses. Empirical evaluations may be made with data used in fitting the model, and with additional data not previously used. We emphasize that the validity of conclusions drawn from all these assessments depends on the validity of assumptions underlying both the model and the evaluation. These principles should be kept in mind throughout model construction and evaluation. 1997 2012-06-04T09:02:17Z 2012-06-04T09:02:17Z Journal Article https://hdl.handle.net/10568/17641 en Vanclay, J.K., Skovsgaard., J.P. 1997. Evaluating forest growth models . Ecological Modelling 98 :1-12.
spellingShingle growth models
forests
Vanclay, J.K.
Skovsgaard, J.P.
Evaluating forest growth models
title Evaluating forest growth models
title_full Evaluating forest growth models
title_fullStr Evaluating forest growth models
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating forest growth models
title_short Evaluating forest growth models
title_sort evaluating forest growth models
topic growth models
forests
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/17641
work_keys_str_mv AT vanclayjk evaluatingforestgrowthmodels
AT skovsgaardjp evaluatingforestgrowthmodels