Are farm input subsidies a disincentive for integrated pest management adoption? Evidence from Zambia
Input subsidy programmes (ISPs) remain a popular but contentious policy tool to promote agricultural intensification, food security and poverty reduction across Africa. Although previous studies have explored the impact of ISPs on various smallholder outcomes, no studies have analysed the impact of...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Language: | Inglés |
| Published: |
2025
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/174512 |
Similar Items: Are farm input subsidies a disincentive for integrated pest management adoption? Evidence from Zambia
- Are farm input subsidies a disincentive for integrated pest management adoption? evidence from Zambia
- Genetic studies of fall armyworm indicate a new introduction into Africa and identify limits to its migratory behavior
- Managing fall armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda J.E. Smith) using leaf residue of neem (Azadirachta indica A. Juss) on maize (Zea mays L.) under natural infestation
- Adoption and welfare impacts of multiple agricultural technologies: evidence from eastern Zambia
- Does cooperative membership increase and accelerate agricultural technology adoption? Empirical evidence from Zambia
- Gender, communication and within-village input supply in IPM adoption: Policy lessons from an impact evaluation study in Uganda