Top-down vs bottom-up processes: A systematic review clarifying roles and patterns of interactions in food system transformation
Urgent calls for food system transformation have spurred a variety of responses globally. In some cases, these calls have been answered through top-down led processes, driven by public agencies to design and implement measures that can drive societies towards more viable patterns of development. In...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Language: | Inglés |
| Published: |
Elsevier
2025
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/173668 |
| _version_ | 1855528102930677760 |
|---|---|
| author | Conti, Costanza Hall, Andy Moallemi, Enayat A. Laila, Amar Bene, Christophe Fanzo, Jessica Gibson, Matthew Ford Gordon, Line Hicks, Christina Kok, Kristiaan Rao, Nitya Laxminarayan, Ramanan Mason-D'Croz, Daniel |
| author_browse | Bene, Christophe Conti, Costanza Fanzo, Jessica Gibson, Matthew Ford Gordon, Line Hall, Andy Hicks, Christina Kok, Kristiaan Laila, Amar Laxminarayan, Ramanan Mason-D'Croz, Daniel Moallemi, Enayat A. Rao, Nitya |
| author_facet | Conti, Costanza Hall, Andy Moallemi, Enayat A. Laila, Amar Bene, Christophe Fanzo, Jessica Gibson, Matthew Ford Gordon, Line Hicks, Christina Kok, Kristiaan Rao, Nitya Laxminarayan, Ramanan Mason-D'Croz, Daniel |
| author_sort | Conti, Costanza |
| collection | Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace) |
| description | Urgent calls for food system transformation have spurred a variety of responses globally. In some cases, these calls have been answered through top-down led processes, driven by public agencies to design and implement measures that can drive societies towards more viable patterns of development. In other cases, transformation processes have been ignited by community level actors who addressed sustainability issues with context-specific solutions. The broad range of actors raises the question of whether it is top-down or bottom-up processes and actors that are better placed to deliver the fundamental and system level changes that characterise transformation. Through a systematic review, we identified 40 case studies across 24 countries to investigate the role of top-down or bottom-up processes in transformation, whether the two might intertwine, and with what results. We propose five different types of interactions: Autonomous Bottom-Up, Collaborative Bottom-Up, Top-Down Struggles and Resourceful Bottom-Up, Collaborative Top-Down and Transformation Alliances. Based on our analysis, we propose a new heuristic of roles and interactions between different actors. We suggest a shift from dichotomic views on top-down and bottom-up actor roles towards the concept of “transformation functions,” which would re-centre the discussion around the existing or needed capabilities for transformation in different contexts. Finally, we call for further research to determine how different transformation functions need to become more synchronised -or coordinated-to accelerate transformation. |
| format | Journal Article |
| id | CGSpace173668 |
| institution | CGIAR Consortium |
| language | Inglés |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| publishDateRange | 2025 |
| publishDateSort | 2025 |
| publisher | Elsevier |
| publisherStr | Elsevier |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | CGSpace1736682025-12-08T09:54:28Z Top-down vs bottom-up processes: A systematic review clarifying roles and patterns of interactions in food system transformation Conti, Costanza Hall, Andy Moallemi, Enayat A. Laila, Amar Bene, Christophe Fanzo, Jessica Gibson, Matthew Ford Gordon, Line Hicks, Christina Kok, Kristiaan Rao, Nitya Laxminarayan, Ramanan Mason-D'Croz, Daniel transformation food systems sostenibilidad sustainability transformación sistema alimentario processes proceso Urgent calls for food system transformation have spurred a variety of responses globally. In some cases, these calls have been answered through top-down led processes, driven by public agencies to design and implement measures that can drive societies towards more viable patterns of development. In other cases, transformation processes have been ignited by community level actors who addressed sustainability issues with context-specific solutions. The broad range of actors raises the question of whether it is top-down or bottom-up processes and actors that are better placed to deliver the fundamental and system level changes that characterise transformation. Through a systematic review, we identified 40 case studies across 24 countries to investigate the role of top-down or bottom-up processes in transformation, whether the two might intertwine, and with what results. We propose five different types of interactions: Autonomous Bottom-Up, Collaborative Bottom-Up, Top-Down Struggles and Resourceful Bottom-Up, Collaborative Top-Down and Transformation Alliances. Based on our analysis, we propose a new heuristic of roles and interactions between different actors. We suggest a shift from dichotomic views on top-down and bottom-up actor roles towards the concept of “transformation functions,” which would re-centre the discussion around the existing or needed capabilities for transformation in different contexts. Finally, we call for further research to determine how different transformation functions need to become more synchronised -or coordinated-to accelerate transformation. 2025-03 2025-03-18T06:19:23Z 2025-03-18T06:19:23Z Journal Article https://hdl.handle.net/10568/173668 en Open Access application/pdf Elsevier Conti, C.; Hall, A.; Moallemi, E.A.; Laila, A.; Bene, C.; Fanzo, J.; Gibson, M.F.; Gordon, L.; Hicks, C.; Kok, K.; Rao, N.; Laxminarayan, R.; Mason-D'Croz, D. (2025) Top-down vs bottom-up processes: A systematic review clarifying roles and patterns of interactions in food system transformation. Global Food Security 44: 100833. ISSN: 2211-9124 |
| spellingShingle | transformation food systems sostenibilidad sustainability transformación sistema alimentario processes proceso Conti, Costanza Hall, Andy Moallemi, Enayat A. Laila, Amar Bene, Christophe Fanzo, Jessica Gibson, Matthew Ford Gordon, Line Hicks, Christina Kok, Kristiaan Rao, Nitya Laxminarayan, Ramanan Mason-D'Croz, Daniel Top-down vs bottom-up processes: A systematic review clarifying roles and patterns of interactions in food system transformation |
| title | Top-down vs bottom-up processes: A systematic review clarifying roles and patterns of interactions in food system transformation |
| title_full | Top-down vs bottom-up processes: A systematic review clarifying roles and patterns of interactions in food system transformation |
| title_fullStr | Top-down vs bottom-up processes: A systematic review clarifying roles and patterns of interactions in food system transformation |
| title_full_unstemmed | Top-down vs bottom-up processes: A systematic review clarifying roles and patterns of interactions in food system transformation |
| title_short | Top-down vs bottom-up processes: A systematic review clarifying roles and patterns of interactions in food system transformation |
| title_sort | top down vs bottom up processes a systematic review clarifying roles and patterns of interactions in food system transformation |
| topic | transformation food systems sostenibilidad sustainability transformación sistema alimentario processes proceso |
| url | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/173668 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT conticostanza topdownvsbottomupprocessesasystematicreviewclarifyingrolesandpatternsofinteractionsinfoodsystemtransformation AT hallandy topdownvsbottomupprocessesasystematicreviewclarifyingrolesandpatternsofinteractionsinfoodsystemtransformation AT moallemienayata topdownvsbottomupprocessesasystematicreviewclarifyingrolesandpatternsofinteractionsinfoodsystemtransformation AT lailaamar topdownvsbottomupprocessesasystematicreviewclarifyingrolesandpatternsofinteractionsinfoodsystemtransformation AT benechristophe topdownvsbottomupprocessesasystematicreviewclarifyingrolesandpatternsofinteractionsinfoodsystemtransformation AT fanzojessica topdownvsbottomupprocessesasystematicreviewclarifyingrolesandpatternsofinteractionsinfoodsystemtransformation AT gibsonmatthewford topdownvsbottomupprocessesasystematicreviewclarifyingrolesandpatternsofinteractionsinfoodsystemtransformation AT gordonline topdownvsbottomupprocessesasystematicreviewclarifyingrolesandpatternsofinteractionsinfoodsystemtransformation AT hickschristina topdownvsbottomupprocessesasystematicreviewclarifyingrolesandpatternsofinteractionsinfoodsystemtransformation AT kokkristiaan topdownvsbottomupprocessesasystematicreviewclarifyingrolesandpatternsofinteractionsinfoodsystemtransformation AT raonitya topdownvsbottomupprocessesasystematicreviewclarifyingrolesandpatternsofinteractionsinfoodsystemtransformation AT laxminarayanramanan topdownvsbottomupprocessesasystematicreviewclarifyingrolesandpatternsofinteractionsinfoodsystemtransformation AT masondcrozdaniel topdownvsbottomupprocessesasystematicreviewclarifyingrolesandpatternsofinteractionsinfoodsystemtransformation |