Measuring the holistic performance of food and agricultural systems: a systematic review
Measuring the performance of food and agricultural systems is critical for their transformation towards a sustainable, healthy, and resilient future. To guide decisions and ensure agrifood systems deliver multiple functions, a holistic systems perspective is needed. Previous reviews of assessment ap...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Language: | Inglés |
| Published: |
Frontiers Media
2025
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/173627 |
| _version_ | 1855537691568898048 |
|---|---|
| author | Crossland, Mary Coe, Ric Lamanna, Christine Chiputwa, Brian Orero, Levi Adoyo, Beatrice Kumar, Sandhya Mwangi, Victor Mutugi Anyango, Edith Fuchs, Lisa Elena Kuria, Anne Geck, Matthias |
| author_browse | Adoyo, Beatrice Anyango, Edith Chiputwa, Brian Coe, Ric Crossland, Mary Fuchs, Lisa Elena Geck, Matthias Kumar, Sandhya Kuria, Anne Lamanna, Christine Mwangi, Victor Mutugi Orero, Levi |
| author_facet | Crossland, Mary Coe, Ric Lamanna, Christine Chiputwa, Brian Orero, Levi Adoyo, Beatrice Kumar, Sandhya Mwangi, Victor Mutugi Anyango, Edith Fuchs, Lisa Elena Kuria, Anne Geck, Matthias |
| author_sort | Crossland, Mary |
| collection | Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace) |
| description | Measuring the performance of food and agricultural systems is critical for their transformation towards a sustainable, healthy, and resilient future. To guide decisions and ensure agrifood systems deliver multiple functions, a holistic systems perspective is needed. Previous reviews of assessment approaches have focused primarily on the farm level and have been limited in their scope and definition of what it means to be holistic. In this review, we describe and evaluate 206 approaches based on four key characteristics of holistic systems assessment: (1) measuring multiple dimensions of performance, (2) integrating multiple stakeholder perspectives, (3) evaluating emergent system properties, and (4) collecting and presenting data in ways which reveal interactions, synergies, and trade-offs, so that they can be understood and considered when designing solutions. We find that there is recognition of the need for holistic assessment and a growing number of assessments are published each year. However, many assessments limit themselves to examining multiple dimensions of performance, neglecting the remaining three key characteristics of holistic assessment. While a systemic perspective is often acknowledged as important, only 14% of assessments considered synergies and trade-offs between metrics and 26% addressed emergent system properties. There is a trend toward more systemic framings such as agroecology and the inclusion of emergent properties. We conclude that there will never be one assessment approach that will work for everyone, can measure everything, and be used everywhere because of the diversity of agrifood systems and assessment objectives. Improving holistic assessment of agrifood systems is not a question of improving existing assessments. The gap to be addressed is the lack of methods for designing effective holistic systems assessments. This gap can be closed by providing clear guidance on how to navigate the abundance of existing approaches and develop assessments that meet specific needs. A meta-framework for guiding the development of holistic systems assessments, proposed in this review, can offer such guidance. |
| format | Journal Article |
| id | CGSpace173627 |
| institution | CGIAR Consortium |
| language | Inglés |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| publishDateRange | 2025 |
| publishDateSort | 2025 |
| publisher | Frontiers Media |
| publisherStr | Frontiers Media |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | CGSpace1736272025-12-08T10:29:22Z Measuring the holistic performance of food and agricultural systems: a systematic review Crossland, Mary Coe, Ric Lamanna, Christine Chiputwa, Brian Orero, Levi Adoyo, Beatrice Kumar, Sandhya Mwangi, Victor Mutugi Anyango, Edith Fuchs, Lisa Elena Kuria, Anne Geck, Matthias food systems agroecology resilience sustainability assessment farming systems frameworks indicators evaluation techniques systematic reviews literature reviews-reviews (literature) Measuring the performance of food and agricultural systems is critical for their transformation towards a sustainable, healthy, and resilient future. To guide decisions and ensure agrifood systems deliver multiple functions, a holistic systems perspective is needed. Previous reviews of assessment approaches have focused primarily on the farm level and have been limited in their scope and definition of what it means to be holistic. In this review, we describe and evaluate 206 approaches based on four key characteristics of holistic systems assessment: (1) measuring multiple dimensions of performance, (2) integrating multiple stakeholder perspectives, (3) evaluating emergent system properties, and (4) collecting and presenting data in ways which reveal interactions, synergies, and trade-offs, so that they can be understood and considered when designing solutions. We find that there is recognition of the need for holistic assessment and a growing number of assessments are published each year. However, many assessments limit themselves to examining multiple dimensions of performance, neglecting the remaining three key characteristics of holistic assessment. While a systemic perspective is often acknowledged as important, only 14% of assessments considered synergies and trade-offs between metrics and 26% addressed emergent system properties. There is a trend toward more systemic framings such as agroecology and the inclusion of emergent properties. We conclude that there will never be one assessment approach that will work for everyone, can measure everything, and be used everywhere because of the diversity of agrifood systems and assessment objectives. Improving holistic assessment of agrifood systems is not a question of improving existing assessments. The gap to be addressed is the lack of methods for designing effective holistic systems assessments. This gap can be closed by providing clear guidance on how to navigate the abundance of existing approaches and develop assessments that meet specific needs. A meta-framework for guiding the development of holistic systems assessments, proposed in this review, can offer such guidance. 2025-02-25 2025-03-17T07:21:33Z 2025-03-17T07:21:33Z Journal Article https://hdl.handle.net/10568/173627 en Open Access application/pdf Frontiers Media Crossland, M.; Coe, R.; Lamanna, C.; Chiputwa, B.; Orero, L.; Adoyo, B.; Kumar, S.; Mwangi, V.M.; Anyango, E.; Fuchs, L.E.; Kuria, A.; Geck, M. (2025) Measuring the holistic performance of food and agricultural systems: a systematic review. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems 9: 1472109. ISSN: 2571-581X |
| spellingShingle | food systems agroecology resilience sustainability assessment farming systems frameworks indicators evaluation techniques systematic reviews literature reviews-reviews (literature) Crossland, Mary Coe, Ric Lamanna, Christine Chiputwa, Brian Orero, Levi Adoyo, Beatrice Kumar, Sandhya Mwangi, Victor Mutugi Anyango, Edith Fuchs, Lisa Elena Kuria, Anne Geck, Matthias Measuring the holistic performance of food and agricultural systems: a systematic review |
| title | Measuring the holistic performance of food and agricultural systems: a systematic review |
| title_full | Measuring the holistic performance of food and agricultural systems: a systematic review |
| title_fullStr | Measuring the holistic performance of food and agricultural systems: a systematic review |
| title_full_unstemmed | Measuring the holistic performance of food and agricultural systems: a systematic review |
| title_short | Measuring the holistic performance of food and agricultural systems: a systematic review |
| title_sort | measuring the holistic performance of food and agricultural systems a systematic review |
| topic | food systems agroecology resilience sustainability assessment farming systems frameworks indicators evaluation techniques systematic reviews literature reviews-reviews (literature) |
| url | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/173627 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT crosslandmary measuringtheholisticperformanceoffoodandagriculturalsystemsasystematicreview AT coeric measuringtheholisticperformanceoffoodandagriculturalsystemsasystematicreview AT lamannachristine measuringtheholisticperformanceoffoodandagriculturalsystemsasystematicreview AT chiputwabrian measuringtheholisticperformanceoffoodandagriculturalsystemsasystematicreview AT orerolevi measuringtheholisticperformanceoffoodandagriculturalsystemsasystematicreview AT adoyobeatrice measuringtheholisticperformanceoffoodandagriculturalsystemsasystematicreview AT kumarsandhya measuringtheholisticperformanceoffoodandagriculturalsystemsasystematicreview AT mwangivictormutugi measuringtheholisticperformanceoffoodandagriculturalsystemsasystematicreview AT anyangoedith measuringtheholisticperformanceoffoodandagriculturalsystemsasystematicreview AT fuchslisaelena measuringtheholisticperformanceoffoodandagriculturalsystemsasystematicreview AT kuriaanne measuringtheholisticperformanceoffoodandagriculturalsystemsasystematicreview AT geckmatthias measuringtheholisticperformanceoffoodandagriculturalsystemsasystematicreview |