Trust, hope, and collective action in fragile political settings: a qualitative comparative analysis of water user groups in Tunisia
Collective action theory acknowledges that self-governing institutional arrangements, such as water user groups, can successfully develop strategies to address natural resource problems. However, studies of collective action have largely neglected the role of social, political and/or ecological frag...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Language: | Inglés |
| Published: |
Elsevier
2025
|
| Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/173528 |
Similar Items: Trust, hope, and collective action in fragile political settings: a qualitative comparative analysis of water user groups in Tunisia
- Malinau villagers’ relationship with CIFOR: high hopes, unmet expectations and trusted confidance
- Collecting quantitative gender disaggregated data in fragile settings
- Political trust and informal traders in African cities
- Partnerships as the path to stability in fragile settings
- Rebuilding trust in local governance in conflict-affected settings
- How to responsibly scale innovations in fragile settings?