Pluralisme hokum dan kinamika hak atas property: Indonesian translation of Legal pluralism and dynamic property rights
Conventional conceptions of property rights focus on static definitions of property rights, usually as defined in statutory law. However, in practice there is co-existence and interaction between multiple legal orders such as state, customary, religious, project and local laws, all of which provide...
| Autores principales: | , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Capítulo de libro |
| Lenguaje: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
HuMa
2006
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/172238 |
| _version_ | 1855519205706694656 |
|---|---|
| author | Meinzen-Dick, Ruth S. Pradhan, Rajendra |
| author_browse | Meinzen-Dick, Ruth S. Pradhan, Rajendra |
| author_facet | Meinzen-Dick, Ruth S. Pradhan, Rajendra |
| author_sort | Meinzen-Dick, Ruth S. |
| collection | Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace) |
| description | Conventional conceptions of property rights focus on static definitions of property rights, usually as defined in statutory law. However, in practice there is co-existence and interaction between multiple legal orders such as state, customary, religious, project and local laws, all of which provide bases for claiming property rights. Legal anthropological approaches that recognize this legal pluralism are helpful in understanding this complexity. Individuals may choose one or another of these legal frameworks as the basis for their claims on a resource, in a process referred to as “forum shopping.” Legal pluralism can create uncertainty especially in times of conflict because any individual is unlikely to have knowledge of all types of law that might be relevant, and because rival claimants can use a large repertoire to lay claim to a resource. However, at the same time the multiple legal frameworks facilitate considerable flexibility for people to maneuver in their use of natural resources. Legal pluralism also introduces a sense of dynamism in property rights, as the different legal frameworks do not exist in isolation, but influence each other, and can change over time. Unless these aspects of property rights are recognized, changes in statutory law intended to increase tenure security may instead increase uncertainty, especially for groups with less education and contacts. This paper illustrates the implications of legal pluralism for our understanding of natural resource management and policies toward resource tenure, using the example of water rights. (text of Abstract) |
| format | Book Chapter |
| id | CGSpace172238 |
| institution | CGIAR Consortium |
| language | Inglés |
| publishDate | 2006 |
| publishDateRange | 2006 |
| publishDateSort | 2006 |
| publisher | HuMa |
| publisherStr | HuMa |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | CGSpace1722382025-01-29T12:59:37Z Pluralisme hokum dan kinamika hak atas property: Indonesian translation of Legal pluralism and dynamic property rights Meinzen-Dick, Ruth S. Pradhan, Rajendra conflict management property transfers ownership inheritance economics legal rights water rights tenure natural resources resource management Conventional conceptions of property rights focus on static definitions of property rights, usually as defined in statutory law. However, in practice there is co-existence and interaction between multiple legal orders such as state, customary, religious, project and local laws, all of which provide bases for claiming property rights. Legal anthropological approaches that recognize this legal pluralism are helpful in understanding this complexity. Individuals may choose one or another of these legal frameworks as the basis for their claims on a resource, in a process referred to as “forum shopping.” Legal pluralism can create uncertainty especially in times of conflict because any individual is unlikely to have knowledge of all types of law that might be relevant, and because rival claimants can use a large repertoire to lay claim to a resource. However, at the same time the multiple legal frameworks facilitate considerable flexibility for people to maneuver in their use of natural resources. Legal pluralism also introduces a sense of dynamism in property rights, as the different legal frameworks do not exist in isolation, but influence each other, and can change over time. Unless these aspects of property rights are recognized, changes in statutory law intended to increase tenure security may instead increase uncertainty, especially for groups with less education and contacts. This paper illustrates the implications of legal pluralism for our understanding of natural resource management and policies toward resource tenure, using the example of water rights. (text of Abstract) 2006 2025-01-29T12:59:37Z 2025-01-29T12:59:37Z Book Chapter https://hdl.handle.net/10568/172238 en Limited Access HuMa Meinzen-Dick, Ruth S.; Pradhan, Rajendra. 2006. Pluralisme hokum dan kinamika hak atas property: Indonesian translation of Legal pluralism and dynamic property rights. In Pluralism Hukum: Subuah Pendekatan Interdisiplini. Pp. 169-166 |
| spellingShingle | conflict management property transfers ownership inheritance economics legal rights water rights tenure natural resources resource management Meinzen-Dick, Ruth S. Pradhan, Rajendra Pluralisme hokum dan kinamika hak atas property: Indonesian translation of Legal pluralism and dynamic property rights |
| title | Pluralisme hokum dan kinamika hak atas property: Indonesian translation of Legal pluralism and dynamic property rights |
| title_full | Pluralisme hokum dan kinamika hak atas property: Indonesian translation of Legal pluralism and dynamic property rights |
| title_fullStr | Pluralisme hokum dan kinamika hak atas property: Indonesian translation of Legal pluralism and dynamic property rights |
| title_full_unstemmed | Pluralisme hokum dan kinamika hak atas property: Indonesian translation of Legal pluralism and dynamic property rights |
| title_short | Pluralisme hokum dan kinamika hak atas property: Indonesian translation of Legal pluralism and dynamic property rights |
| title_sort | pluralisme hokum dan kinamika hak atas property indonesian translation of legal pluralism and dynamic property rights |
| topic | conflict management property transfers ownership inheritance economics legal rights water rights tenure natural resources resource management |
| url | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/172238 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT meinzendickruths pluralismehokumdankinamikahakataspropertyindonesiantranslationoflegalpluralismanddynamicpropertyrights AT pradhanrajendra pluralismehokumdankinamikahakataspropertyindonesiantranslationoflegalpluralismanddynamicpropertyrights |