Rejecting new technology: the case of genetically modified wheat

Canada has stringent regulations covering the release of new wheat varieties, but the United States has virtually no regulations in this area. Monsanto Co. developed genetically modified (GM) spring wheat for North America, and made a commitment to the U.S. industry to release this new technology si...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Berwald, Derek, Carter, Colin A., Gruère, Guillaume P. P.
Format: Journal Article
Language:Inglés
Published: Wiley 2006
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/172115
_version_ 1855514466612936704
author Berwald, Derek
Carter, Colin A.
Gruère, Guillaume P. P.
author_browse Berwald, Derek
Carter, Colin A.
Gruère, Guillaume P. P.
author_facet Berwald, Derek
Carter, Colin A.
Gruère, Guillaume P. P.
author_sort Berwald, Derek
collection Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace)
description Canada has stringent regulations covering the release of new wheat varieties, but the United States has virtually no regulations in this area. Monsanto Co. developed genetically modified (GM) spring wheat for North America, and made a commitment to the U.S. industry to release this new technology simultaneously in both Canada and the United States, or not at all. The Canadian regulatory bias against new varieties acted as a veto against GM wheat and caused Monsanto to shelve the technology in both countries in 2004. Substantial economic rents were foregone in North America due to the rejection of this new technology.
format Journal Article
id CGSpace172115
institution CGIAR Consortium
language Inglés
publishDate 2006
publishDateRange 2006
publishDateSort 2006
publisher Wiley
publisherStr Wiley
record_format dspace
spelling CGSpace1721152025-02-19T14:06:41Z Rejecting new technology: the case of genetically modified wheat Berwald, Derek Carter, Colin A. Gruère, Guillaume P. P. genetically modified organisms consumers agricultural technology biosafety cost benefit analysis technology wheat economic analysis Canada has stringent regulations covering the release of new wheat varieties, but the United States has virtually no regulations in this area. Monsanto Co. developed genetically modified (GM) spring wheat for North America, and made a commitment to the U.S. industry to release this new technology simultaneously in both Canada and the United States, or not at all. The Canadian regulatory bias against new varieties acted as a veto against GM wheat and caused Monsanto to shelve the technology in both countries in 2004. Substantial economic rents were foregone in North America due to the rejection of this new technology. 2006-05 2025-01-29T12:59:22Z 2025-01-29T12:59:22Z Journal Article https://hdl.handle.net/10568/172115 en Limited Access Wiley Berwald, Derek; Carter, Colin A.; Gruère, Guillaume P. P. 2006. Rejecting new technology: the case of genetically modified wheat. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 88(2): 432-447. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8276.2006.00869.x
spellingShingle genetically modified organisms
consumers
agricultural technology
biosafety
cost benefit analysis
technology
wheat
economic analysis
Berwald, Derek
Carter, Colin A.
Gruère, Guillaume P. P.
Rejecting new technology: the case of genetically modified wheat
title Rejecting new technology: the case of genetically modified wheat
title_full Rejecting new technology: the case of genetically modified wheat
title_fullStr Rejecting new technology: the case of genetically modified wheat
title_full_unstemmed Rejecting new technology: the case of genetically modified wheat
title_short Rejecting new technology: the case of genetically modified wheat
title_sort rejecting new technology the case of genetically modified wheat
topic genetically modified organisms
consumers
agricultural technology
biosafety
cost benefit analysis
technology
wheat
economic analysis
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/172115
work_keys_str_mv AT berwaldderek rejectingnewtechnologythecaseofgeneticallymodifiedwheat
AT cartercolina rejectingnewtechnologythecaseofgeneticallymodifiedwheat
AT gruereguillaumepp rejectingnewtechnologythecaseofgeneticallymodifiedwheat