Assessing climate risks in rainfed farming using farmer experience, crop calendars and climate analysis

Climate risk assessment in cropping is generally undertaken in a top-down approach using climate records while critical farmer experience is often not accounted for. In the present study, set in south India, farmer experience of climate risk is integrated in a bottom-up participatory approach with c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nidumolu, U. B., Hayman, P. T., Hochman, Z., Horan, H., Reddy, D. R., Sreenivas, G., Kadiyala, D.M.
Formato: Journal Article
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/170959
_version_ 1855520730748289024
author Nidumolu, U. B.
Hayman, P. T.
Hochman, Z.
Horan, H.
Reddy, D. R.
Sreenivas, G.
Kadiyala, D.M.
author_browse Hayman, P. T.
Hochman, Z.
Horan, H.
Kadiyala, D.M.
Nidumolu, U. B.
Reddy, D. R.
Sreenivas, G.
author_facet Nidumolu, U. B.
Hayman, P. T.
Hochman, Z.
Horan, H.
Reddy, D. R.
Sreenivas, G.
Kadiyala, D.M.
author_sort Nidumolu, U. B.
collection Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace)
description Climate risk assessment in cropping is generally undertaken in a top-down approach using climate records while critical farmer experience is often not accounted for. In the present study, set in south India, farmer experience of climate risk is integrated in a bottom-up participatory approach with climate data analysis. Crop calendars are used as a boundary object to identify and rank climate and weather risks faced by smallhold farmers. A semi-structured survey was conducted with experienced farmers whose income is predominantly from farming. Interviews were based on a crop calendar to indicate the timing of key weather and climate risks. The simple definition of risk as consequence × likelihood was used to establish the impact on yield as consequence and chance of occurrence in a 10-year period as likelihood. Farmers’ risk experience matches well with climate records and risk analysis. Farmers’ rankings of ‘good’ and ‘poor’ seasons also matched up well with their independently reported yield data. On average, a ‘good’ season yield was 1·5–1·65 times higher than a ‘poor’ season. The main risks for paddy rice were excess rains at harvesting and flowering and deficit rains at transplanting. For cotton, farmers identified excess rain at harvest, delayed rains at sowing and excess rain at flowering stages as events that impacted crop yield and quality. The risk assessment elicited from farmers complements climate analysis and provides some indication of thresholds for studies on climate change and seasonal forecasts. The methods and analysis presented in the present study provide an experiential bottom-up perspective and a methodology on farming in a risky rainfed climate. The methods developed in the present study provide a model for end-user engagement by meteorological agencies that strive to better target their climate information delivery.
format Journal Article
id CGSpace170959
institution CGIAR Consortium
language Inglés
publishDate 2015
publishDateRange 2015
publishDateSort 2015
publisher Cambridge University Press
publisherStr Cambridge University Press
record_format dspace
spelling CGSpace1709592025-02-19T14:36:09Z Assessing climate risks in rainfed farming using farmer experience, crop calendars and climate analysis Nidumolu, U. B. Hayman, P. T. Hochman, Z. Horan, H. Reddy, D. R. Sreenivas, G. Kadiyala, D.M. climate risk farming systems rainfed farming crop calendar Climate risk assessment in cropping is generally undertaken in a top-down approach using climate records while critical farmer experience is often not accounted for. In the present study, set in south India, farmer experience of climate risk is integrated in a bottom-up participatory approach with climate data analysis. Crop calendars are used as a boundary object to identify and rank climate and weather risks faced by smallhold farmers. A semi-structured survey was conducted with experienced farmers whose income is predominantly from farming. Interviews were based on a crop calendar to indicate the timing of key weather and climate risks. The simple definition of risk as consequence × likelihood was used to establish the impact on yield as consequence and chance of occurrence in a 10-year period as likelihood. Farmers’ risk experience matches well with climate records and risk analysis. Farmers’ rankings of ‘good’ and ‘poor’ seasons also matched up well with their independently reported yield data. On average, a ‘good’ season yield was 1·5–1·65 times higher than a ‘poor’ season. The main risks for paddy rice were excess rains at harvesting and flowering and deficit rains at transplanting. For cotton, farmers identified excess rain at harvest, delayed rains at sowing and excess rain at flowering stages as events that impacted crop yield and quality. The risk assessment elicited from farmers complements climate analysis and provides some indication of thresholds for studies on climate change and seasonal forecasts. The methods and analysis presented in the present study provide an experiential bottom-up perspective and a methodology on farming in a risky rainfed climate. The methods developed in the present study provide a model for end-user engagement by meteorological agencies that strive to better target their climate information delivery. 2015-11 2025-01-29T12:57:32Z 2025-01-29T12:57:32Z Journal Article https://hdl.handle.net/10568/170959 en Limited Access Cambridge University Press Nidumolu, U. B.; Hayman, P. T.; Hochman, Z.; Horan, H.; Reddy, D. R.; Sreenivas, G.; Kadiyala, D.M. 2015. Assessing climate risks in rainfed farming using farmer experience, crop calendars and climate analysis. The Journal of Agricultural Science 153(2015): 1380 - 1393. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859615000283
spellingShingle climate
risk
farming systems
rainfed farming
crop calendar
Nidumolu, U. B.
Hayman, P. T.
Hochman, Z.
Horan, H.
Reddy, D. R.
Sreenivas, G.
Kadiyala, D.M.
Assessing climate risks in rainfed farming using farmer experience, crop calendars and climate analysis
title Assessing climate risks in rainfed farming using farmer experience, crop calendars and climate analysis
title_full Assessing climate risks in rainfed farming using farmer experience, crop calendars and climate analysis
title_fullStr Assessing climate risks in rainfed farming using farmer experience, crop calendars and climate analysis
title_full_unstemmed Assessing climate risks in rainfed farming using farmer experience, crop calendars and climate analysis
title_short Assessing climate risks in rainfed farming using farmer experience, crop calendars and climate analysis
title_sort assessing climate risks in rainfed farming using farmer experience crop calendars and climate analysis
topic climate
risk
farming systems
rainfed farming
crop calendar
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/170959
work_keys_str_mv AT nidumoluub assessingclimaterisksinrainfedfarmingusingfarmerexperiencecropcalendarsandclimateanalysis
AT haymanpt assessingclimaterisksinrainfedfarmingusingfarmerexperiencecropcalendarsandclimateanalysis
AT hochmanz assessingclimaterisksinrainfedfarmingusingfarmerexperiencecropcalendarsandclimateanalysis
AT horanh assessingclimaterisksinrainfedfarmingusingfarmerexperiencecropcalendarsandclimateanalysis
AT reddydr assessingclimaterisksinrainfedfarmingusingfarmerexperiencecropcalendarsandclimateanalysis
AT sreenivasg assessingclimaterisksinrainfedfarmingusingfarmerexperiencecropcalendarsandclimateanalysis
AT kadiyaladm assessingclimaterisksinrainfedfarmingusingfarmerexperiencecropcalendarsandclimateanalysis