Rationale for a follow-up study focusing on economic productivity

Past studies of nutrition, human capital formation, and economic productivity have been limited by the fact that biomedical researchers and economists work largely in isolation, with loss of complementarity. Biomedical researchers are faulted for not adequately addressing bias and measurement issues...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Martorell, Reynaldo, Behrman, Jere R., Flores, Rafael, Stein, Aryeh D.
Format: Journal Article
Language:Inglés
Published: SAGE Publications 2005
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/170438
_version_ 1855513454532624384
author Martorell, Reynaldo
Behrman, Jere R.
Flores, Rafael
Stein, Aryeh D.
author_browse Behrman, Jere R.
Flores, Rafael
Martorell, Reynaldo
Stein, Aryeh D.
author_facet Martorell, Reynaldo
Behrman, Jere R.
Flores, Rafael
Stein, Aryeh D.
author_sort Martorell, Reynaldo
collection Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace)
description Past studies of nutrition, human capital formation, and economic productivity have been limited by the fact that biomedical researchers and economists work largely in isolation, with loss of complementarity. Biomedical researchers are faulted for not adequately addressing bias and measurement issues and for naïve analyses and interpretation of results, whereas economists are criticized for using simplistic nutrition and physiological measures and for relying on statistical methods rather than experimental designs. To avoid these problems, a multidisciplinary team of biomedical investigators and economists undertook a follow-up study in 2002–04 of a cohort of young men and women, who participated as young children in a randomized community trial of nutrition supplementation carried out from 1969–77. Previous studies, particularly the original trial and a 1988–89 follow-up, are described to provide an overview of the data available for linkage with the 2002–04 follow-up. Key results from these earlier studies are reviewed but judged inconclusive because the data used were collected when many subjects were still growing and developing physically, in school, unmarried, and/or not yet settled into occupations. The subjects were 26 to 41 years of age in 2003, permitting a more complete assessment of human capital and economic productivity. The experimental design of the 1969–77 original study, 35 years of follow-up, use of robust methods of data collection, and the participation of a multidisciplinary team will likely lead to the most comprehensive assessment to date of the importance of nutrition for economic productivity.
format Journal Article
id CGSpace170438
institution CGIAR Consortium
language Inglés
publishDate 2005
publishDateRange 2005
publishDateSort 2005
publisher SAGE Publications
publisherStr SAGE Publications
record_format dspace
spelling CGSpace1704382025-02-19T14:06:37Z Rationale for a follow-up study focusing on economic productivity Martorell, Reynaldo Behrman, Jere R. Flores, Rafael Stein, Aryeh D. agriculture Past studies of nutrition, human capital formation, and economic productivity have been limited by the fact that biomedical researchers and economists work largely in isolation, with loss of complementarity. Biomedical researchers are faulted for not adequately addressing bias and measurement issues and for naïve analyses and interpretation of results, whereas economists are criticized for using simplistic nutrition and physiological measures and for relying on statistical methods rather than experimental designs. To avoid these problems, a multidisciplinary team of biomedical investigators and economists undertook a follow-up study in 2002–04 of a cohort of young men and women, who participated as young children in a randomized community trial of nutrition supplementation carried out from 1969–77. Previous studies, particularly the original trial and a 1988–89 follow-up, are described to provide an overview of the data available for linkage with the 2002–04 follow-up. Key results from these earlier studies are reviewed but judged inconclusive because the data used were collected when many subjects were still growing and developing physically, in school, unmarried, and/or not yet settled into occupations. The subjects were 26 to 41 years of age in 2003, permitting a more complete assessment of human capital and economic productivity. The experimental design of the 1969–77 original study, 35 years of follow-up, use of robust methods of data collection, and the participation of a multidisciplinary team will likely lead to the most comprehensive assessment to date of the importance of nutrition for economic productivity. 2005-06 2025-01-29T12:56:58Z 2025-01-29T12:56:58Z Journal Article https://hdl.handle.net/10568/170438 en Limited Access SAGE Publications Martorell, Reynaldo; Behrman, Jere R.; Flores, Rafael; Stein, Aryeh D. 2005. Rationale for a follow-up study focusing on economic productivity. Food and Nutrition Bulletin 26(2 Suppl 1): S5-S14. https://doi.org/10.1177/15648265050262S102
spellingShingle agriculture
Martorell, Reynaldo
Behrman, Jere R.
Flores, Rafael
Stein, Aryeh D.
Rationale for a follow-up study focusing on economic productivity
title Rationale for a follow-up study focusing on economic productivity
title_full Rationale for a follow-up study focusing on economic productivity
title_fullStr Rationale for a follow-up study focusing on economic productivity
title_full_unstemmed Rationale for a follow-up study focusing on economic productivity
title_short Rationale for a follow-up study focusing on economic productivity
title_sort rationale for a follow up study focusing on economic productivity
topic agriculture
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/170438
work_keys_str_mv AT martorellreynaldo rationaleforafollowupstudyfocusingoneconomicproductivity
AT behrmanjerer rationaleforafollowupstudyfocusingoneconomicproductivity
AT floresrafael rationaleforafollowupstudyfocusingoneconomicproductivity
AT steinaryehd rationaleforafollowupstudyfocusingoneconomicproductivity