Institutions and market distortions: international evidence for tobacco

The link between institutional factors and agricultural protection levels is investigated using cross‐section time series data on three tobacco types. The analysis includes the presence of monopsonistic marketing agencies, political institutions, and the feasibility of tax revenue collection and div...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Beghin, John C., Foster, William E., Kherallah, Mylene
Formato: Journal Article
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: Wiley 1996
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/170325
_version_ 1855534184072740864
author Beghin, John C.
Foster, William E.
Kherallah, Mylene
author_browse Beghin, John C.
Foster, William E.
Kherallah, Mylene
author_facet Beghin, John C.
Foster, William E.
Kherallah, Mylene
author_sort Beghin, John C.
collection Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace)
description The link between institutional factors and agricultural protection levels is investigated using cross‐section time series data on three tobacco types. The analysis includes the presence of monopsonistic marketing agencies, political institutions, and the feasibility of tax revenue collection and diversification. Protection increases with economic development and with well functioning direct taxation systems, but tends to be lower in the most advanced pluralistic democracies. The presence of strong anti‐smoking interest groups seems to galvanise the lobbying effort of tobacco farmers — higher protection is associated with that presence.
format Journal Article
id CGSpace170325
institution CGIAR Consortium
language Inglés
publishDate 1996
publishDateRange 1996
publishDateSort 1996
publisher Wiley
publisherStr Wiley
record_format dspace
spelling CGSpace1703252025-01-29T12:56:52Z Institutions and market distortions: international evidence for tobacco Beghin, John C. Foster, William E. Kherallah, Mylene tobacco prices price policies developed countries developing countries The link between institutional factors and agricultural protection levels is investigated using cross‐section time series data on three tobacco types. The analysis includes the presence of monopsonistic marketing agencies, political institutions, and the feasibility of tax revenue collection and diversification. Protection increases with economic development and with well functioning direct taxation systems, but tends to be lower in the most advanced pluralistic democracies. The presence of strong anti‐smoking interest groups seems to galvanise the lobbying effort of tobacco farmers — higher protection is associated with that presence. 1996-01 2025-01-29T12:56:52Z 2025-01-29T12:56:52Z Journal Article https://hdl.handle.net/10568/170325 en Limited Access Wiley Beghin, John C.; Foster, William E.; Kherallah, Mylene. 1996. Institutions and market distortions: international evidence for tobacco. Journal of Agricultural Economics 47(3): 355-365. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-9552.1996.tb00698.x
spellingShingle tobacco
prices
price policies
developed countries
developing countries
Beghin, John C.
Foster, William E.
Kherallah, Mylene
Institutions and market distortions: international evidence for tobacco
title Institutions and market distortions: international evidence for tobacco
title_full Institutions and market distortions: international evidence for tobacco
title_fullStr Institutions and market distortions: international evidence for tobacco
title_full_unstemmed Institutions and market distortions: international evidence for tobacco
title_short Institutions and market distortions: international evidence for tobacco
title_sort institutions and market distortions international evidence for tobacco
topic tobacco
prices
price policies
developed countries
developing countries
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/170325
work_keys_str_mv AT beghinjohnc institutionsandmarketdistortionsinternationalevidencefortobacco
AT fosterwilliame institutionsandmarketdistortionsinternationalevidencefortobacco
AT kherallahmylene institutionsandmarketdistortionsinternationalevidencefortobacco