Man vs. machine: Experimental evidence on the quality and perceptions of AI-generated research content
Academic researchers want their research to be understood and used by non-technical audiences, but that requires communication that is more accessible in the form of non-technical and shorter summaries. The researcher must both signal the quality of the research and ensure that the content is salien...
| Autores principales: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo preliminar |
| Lenguaje: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
International Food Policy Research Institute
2024
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/169363 |
Ejemplares similares: Man vs. machine: Experimental evidence on the quality and perceptions of AI-generated research content
- Trust the messenger? The role of AI transparency in policy research communication
- Can we trust large language models to summarize food policy research papers and generate research briefs?
- Can we trust AI to generate agricultural extension advisories?
- CGIAR AI readiness and needs assessment
- CGIAR AI landscape 2025: Needs, opportunities, and next steps
- AI for food systems transformation: CGIAR’s readiness, momentum, and investment opportunity