Adapting and combining foresight and ex ante impact pathway evaluation for place‐based research planning with stakeholders

Evaluators widely utilize theory of change or impact pathway approaches to design and evaluate interventions. In research settings, there is increasing demand for ex ante impact pathways that are place‐based, coherent, and plausible, in order to foster more impactful interventions. Foresight approac...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Blundo-Canto, Genowefa, Ferré, Marie, Tibaduiza‐Castaneda, Leidy, Andrieu, Nadine, Fréguin‐Gresh, Sandrine, Rodriguez‐Borray, Gonzalo, Santacruz‐Castro, Adriana, Mercandalli, Sara
Formato: Journal Article
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: Wiley 2024
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/169073
_version_ 1855514244697554944
author Blundo-Canto, Genowefa
Ferré, Marie
Tibaduiza‐Castaneda, Leidy
Andrieu, Nadine
Fréguin‐Gresh, Sandrine
Rodriguez‐Borray, Gonzalo
Santacruz‐Castro, Adriana
Mercandalli, Sara
author_browse Andrieu, Nadine
Blundo-Canto, Genowefa
Ferré, Marie
Fréguin‐Gresh, Sandrine
Mercandalli, Sara
Rodriguez‐Borray, Gonzalo
Santacruz‐Castro, Adriana
Tibaduiza‐Castaneda, Leidy
author_facet Blundo-Canto, Genowefa
Ferré, Marie
Tibaduiza‐Castaneda, Leidy
Andrieu, Nadine
Fréguin‐Gresh, Sandrine
Rodriguez‐Borray, Gonzalo
Santacruz‐Castro, Adriana
Mercandalli, Sara
author_sort Blundo-Canto, Genowefa
collection Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace)
description Evaluators widely utilize theory of change or impact pathway approaches to design and evaluate interventions. In research settings, there is increasing demand for ex ante impact pathways that are place‐based, coherent, and plausible, in order to foster more impactful interventions. Foresight approaches, which enable a collaborative, structured, and systematic way to anticipate, prepare, and affect the course of change, can help achieve this by exploring diverse future scenarios, the consequences of different assumptions, or how to overcome threats and leverage opportunities for change. Through three case examples, we show how foresight tools used prior to developing impact pathways can free participants from preconceived notions of the intervention's context, actors, and impacts, and thus support creative and systemic analyses of the future to rethink the present. They extend the analysis of how different actors can shape the future, identifying effects that might otherwise be overlooked or marginalized during the planning and evaluation of the intervention, while also helping to identify the conditions necessary for desired impacts. Nonetheless, their use entails evaluative judgments about the potential impacts to be prioritized in intervention design and evaluation. This is especially relevant in the case of research where scientific or technical aspects are usually prioritized. Finally, there is an entry cost to foresight tools for evaluators, in particular for the facilitation of strategic thinking about the future. However, we recommend them as a worthwhile addition to the evaluator's toolbox to broaden the scope of design and evaluation.
format Journal Article
id CGSpace169073
institution CGIAR Consortium
language Inglés
publishDate 2024
publishDateRange 2024
publishDateSort 2024
publisher Wiley
publisherStr Wiley
record_format dspace
spelling CGSpace1690732025-11-05T13:00:26Z Adapting and combining foresight and ex ante impact pathway evaluation for place‐based research planning with stakeholders Blundo-Canto, Genowefa Ferré, Marie Tibaduiza‐Castaneda, Leidy Andrieu, Nadine Fréguin‐Gresh, Sandrine Rodriguez‐Borray, Gonzalo Santacruz‐Castro, Adriana Mercandalli, Sara participatory approaches theory of change impact Evaluators widely utilize theory of change or impact pathway approaches to design and evaluate interventions. In research settings, there is increasing demand for ex ante impact pathways that are place‐based, coherent, and plausible, in order to foster more impactful interventions. Foresight approaches, which enable a collaborative, structured, and systematic way to anticipate, prepare, and affect the course of change, can help achieve this by exploring diverse future scenarios, the consequences of different assumptions, or how to overcome threats and leverage opportunities for change. Through three case examples, we show how foresight tools used prior to developing impact pathways can free participants from preconceived notions of the intervention's context, actors, and impacts, and thus support creative and systemic analyses of the future to rethink the present. They extend the analysis of how different actors can shape the future, identifying effects that might otherwise be overlooked or marginalized during the planning and evaluation of the intervention, while also helping to identify the conditions necessary for desired impacts. Nonetheless, their use entails evaluative judgments about the potential impacts to be prioritized in intervention design and evaluation. This is especially relevant in the case of research where scientific or technical aspects are usually prioritized. Finally, there is an entry cost to foresight tools for evaluators, in particular for the facilitation of strategic thinking about the future. However, we recommend them as a worthwhile addition to the evaluator's toolbox to broaden the scope of design and evaluation. 2024-06 2025-01-15T09:39:16Z 2025-01-15T09:39:16Z Journal Article https://hdl.handle.net/10568/169073 en Open Access application/pdf Wiley Blundo-Canto, G.; Ferré, M.; Tibaduiza‐Castaneda, L.; Andrieu, N.; Fréguin‐Gresh, S.; Rodriguez‐Borray, G.; Santacruz‐Castro, A.; Mercandalli, S. (2024) Adapting and combining foresight and ex ante impact pathway evaluation for place‐based research planning with stakeholders. New Directions for Evaluation 2024(182): p. 63-76. ISSN: 1097-6736
spellingShingle participatory approaches
theory of change
impact
Blundo-Canto, Genowefa
Ferré, Marie
Tibaduiza‐Castaneda, Leidy
Andrieu, Nadine
Fréguin‐Gresh, Sandrine
Rodriguez‐Borray, Gonzalo
Santacruz‐Castro, Adriana
Mercandalli, Sara
Adapting and combining foresight and ex ante impact pathway evaluation for place‐based research planning with stakeholders
title Adapting and combining foresight and ex ante impact pathway evaluation for place‐based research planning with stakeholders
title_full Adapting and combining foresight and ex ante impact pathway evaluation for place‐based research planning with stakeholders
title_fullStr Adapting and combining foresight and ex ante impact pathway evaluation for place‐based research planning with stakeholders
title_full_unstemmed Adapting and combining foresight and ex ante impact pathway evaluation for place‐based research planning with stakeholders
title_short Adapting and combining foresight and ex ante impact pathway evaluation for place‐based research planning with stakeholders
title_sort adapting and combining foresight and ex ante impact pathway evaluation for place based research planning with stakeholders
topic participatory approaches
theory of change
impact
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/169073
work_keys_str_mv AT blundocantogenowefa adaptingandcombiningforesightandexanteimpactpathwayevaluationforplacebasedresearchplanningwithstakeholders
AT ferremarie adaptingandcombiningforesightandexanteimpactpathwayevaluationforplacebasedresearchplanningwithstakeholders
AT tibaduizacastanedaleidy adaptingandcombiningforesightandexanteimpactpathwayevaluationforplacebasedresearchplanningwithstakeholders
AT andrieunadine adaptingandcombiningforesightandexanteimpactpathwayevaluationforplacebasedresearchplanningwithstakeholders
AT freguingreshsandrine adaptingandcombiningforesightandexanteimpactpathwayevaluationforplacebasedresearchplanningwithstakeholders
AT rodriguezborraygonzalo adaptingandcombiningforesightandexanteimpactpathwayevaluationforplacebasedresearchplanningwithstakeholders
AT santacruzcastroadriana adaptingandcombiningforesightandexanteimpactpathwayevaluationforplacebasedresearchplanningwithstakeholders
AT mercandallisara adaptingandcombiningforesightandexanteimpactpathwayevaluationforplacebasedresearchplanningwithstakeholders