Repeated Cross-Sectional Survey of Ectoparasites in Sheep from Central Tunisia: Does Low Prevalence Indicate Good Hygiene or Resistance to Ectoparasites?

Sheep ectoparasites such as chewing lice, fleas and ticks are serious constraints to sheep productivity and are the cause of skin lesions in animals that decrease their market value. This study aims at investigating the ectoparasite fauna infesting small ruminants in the district of Sidi Bouzid (cen...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Elati, Khawla, Daly, Nesrine, Dhibi, Mokhtar, Laaribi, Hela, Rekik, Mourad, Gharbi, Mohamed
Format: Journal Article
Language:Inglés
Published: MDPI 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/168924
_version_ 1855536321244692480
author Elati, Khawla
Daly, Nesrine
Dhibi, Mokhtar
Laaribi, Hela
Rekik, Mourad
Gharbi, Mohamed
author_browse Daly, Nesrine
Dhibi, Mokhtar
Elati, Khawla
Gharbi, Mohamed
Laaribi, Hela
Rekik, Mourad
author_facet Elati, Khawla
Daly, Nesrine
Dhibi, Mokhtar
Laaribi, Hela
Rekik, Mourad
Gharbi, Mohamed
author_sort Elati, Khawla
collection Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace)
description Sheep ectoparasites such as chewing lice, fleas and ticks are serious constraints to sheep productivity and are the cause of skin lesions in animals that decrease their market value. This study aims at investigating the ectoparasite fauna infesting small ruminants in the district of Sidi Bouzid (central Tunisia). A total of 1243 Barbarine and Queue Fine de l’Ouest (QFO) sheep were examined every two months for one year. Of the total animals examined, 74 were infested by at least 1 parasite group (5.95%). Three ectoparasite groups were identified as Psoroptes ovis (0.48%; 6/1243), ticks (5.3%; n = 66/1243) and one specimen of Ctenocephalides canis (0.08%; n = 1/1243). The most abundant tick among the 358 specimens was Rhipicephalus sanguineus sensu lato (n = 337; 94.1%), followed by Hyalomma impeltatum (n = 7/358; 1.9%), H. dromedarii (n = 7/358; 1.9%), H. excavatum (n = 5/358; 1.4%) and only two specimens of H. scupense (n = 2/358; 0.55%). The sheep herds showed low infestation prevalence by ectoparasite over the year, with a significant difference according to the seasons (p < 0.05). A higher infestation prevalence was recorded in March (14.36%). Barbarine sheep breed showed significantly higher infestation prevalence (16.8%) compared to QFO (0.8%) (p < 0.01). There were no differences in infestation prevalence according to sex of the animal or age groups. Knowledge of the ectoparasite population harboured by sheep, its activity dynamics and risk factors is required to develop effective ectoparasite control options. The low prevalence of ectoparasite infestation in sheep reported here may be due to possible genetic resistance or simply to successful hygiene measures implemented by farmers.
format Journal Article
id CGSpace168924
institution CGIAR Consortium
language Inglés
publishDate 2024
publishDateRange 2024
publishDateSort 2024
publisher MDPI
publisherStr MDPI
record_format dspace
spelling CGSpace1689242026-01-22T02:13:56Z Repeated Cross-Sectional Survey of Ectoparasites in Sheep from Central Tunisia: Does Low Prevalence Indicate Good Hygiene or Resistance to Ectoparasites? Elati, Khawla Daly, Nesrine Dhibi, Mokhtar Laaribi, Hela Rekik, Mourad Gharbi, Mohamed sheep ticks ectoparasites psoroptes ovis ctenocephalides canis sheep Sheep ectoparasites such as chewing lice, fleas and ticks are serious constraints to sheep productivity and are the cause of skin lesions in animals that decrease their market value. This study aims at investigating the ectoparasite fauna infesting small ruminants in the district of Sidi Bouzid (central Tunisia). A total of 1243 Barbarine and Queue Fine de l’Ouest (QFO) sheep were examined every two months for one year. Of the total animals examined, 74 were infested by at least 1 parasite group (5.95%). Three ectoparasite groups were identified as Psoroptes ovis (0.48%; 6/1243), ticks (5.3%; n = 66/1243) and one specimen of Ctenocephalides canis (0.08%; n = 1/1243). The most abundant tick among the 358 specimens was Rhipicephalus sanguineus sensu lato (n = 337; 94.1%), followed by Hyalomma impeltatum (n = 7/358; 1.9%), H. dromedarii (n = 7/358; 1.9%), H. excavatum (n = 5/358; 1.4%) and only two specimens of H. scupense (n = 2/358; 0.55%). The sheep herds showed low infestation prevalence by ectoparasite over the year, with a significant difference according to the seasons (p < 0.05). A higher infestation prevalence was recorded in March (14.36%). Barbarine sheep breed showed significantly higher infestation prevalence (16.8%) compared to QFO (0.8%) (p < 0.01). There were no differences in infestation prevalence according to sex of the animal or age groups. Knowledge of the ectoparasite population harboured by sheep, its activity dynamics and risk factors is required to develop effective ectoparasite control options. The low prevalence of ectoparasite infestation in sheep reported here may be due to possible genetic resistance or simply to successful hygiene measures implemented by farmers. 2024-03-04 2025-01-13T21:05:29Z 2025-01-13T21:05:29Z Journal Article https://hdl.handle.net/10568/168924 en Open Access application/pdf MDPI Khawla Elati, Nesrine Daly, Mokhtar Dhibi, Hela Laaribi, Mourad Rekik, Mohamed Gharbi. (4/3/2024). Repeated Cross-Sectional Survey of Ectoparasites in Sheep from Central Tunisia: Does Low Prevalence Indicate Good Hygiene or Resistance to Ectoparasites. Animals, 15 (4).
spellingShingle sheep
ticks
ectoparasites
psoroptes ovis
ctenocephalides canis
sheep
Elati, Khawla
Daly, Nesrine
Dhibi, Mokhtar
Laaribi, Hela
Rekik, Mourad
Gharbi, Mohamed
Repeated Cross-Sectional Survey of Ectoparasites in Sheep from Central Tunisia: Does Low Prevalence Indicate Good Hygiene or Resistance to Ectoparasites?
title Repeated Cross-Sectional Survey of Ectoparasites in Sheep from Central Tunisia: Does Low Prevalence Indicate Good Hygiene or Resistance to Ectoparasites?
title_full Repeated Cross-Sectional Survey of Ectoparasites in Sheep from Central Tunisia: Does Low Prevalence Indicate Good Hygiene or Resistance to Ectoparasites?
title_fullStr Repeated Cross-Sectional Survey of Ectoparasites in Sheep from Central Tunisia: Does Low Prevalence Indicate Good Hygiene or Resistance to Ectoparasites?
title_full_unstemmed Repeated Cross-Sectional Survey of Ectoparasites in Sheep from Central Tunisia: Does Low Prevalence Indicate Good Hygiene or Resistance to Ectoparasites?
title_short Repeated Cross-Sectional Survey of Ectoparasites in Sheep from Central Tunisia: Does Low Prevalence Indicate Good Hygiene or Resistance to Ectoparasites?
title_sort repeated cross sectional survey of ectoparasites in sheep from central tunisia does low prevalence indicate good hygiene or resistance to ectoparasites
topic sheep
ticks
ectoparasites
psoroptes ovis
ctenocephalides canis
sheep
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/168924
work_keys_str_mv AT elatikhawla repeatedcrosssectionalsurveyofectoparasitesinsheepfromcentraltunisiadoeslowprevalenceindicategoodhygieneorresistancetoectoparasites
AT dalynesrine repeatedcrosssectionalsurveyofectoparasitesinsheepfromcentraltunisiadoeslowprevalenceindicategoodhygieneorresistancetoectoparasites
AT dhibimokhtar repeatedcrosssectionalsurveyofectoparasitesinsheepfromcentraltunisiadoeslowprevalenceindicategoodhygieneorresistancetoectoparasites
AT laaribihela repeatedcrosssectionalsurveyofectoparasitesinsheepfromcentraltunisiadoeslowprevalenceindicategoodhygieneorresistancetoectoparasites
AT rekikmourad repeatedcrosssectionalsurveyofectoparasitesinsheepfromcentraltunisiadoeslowprevalenceindicategoodhygieneorresistancetoectoparasites
AT gharbimohamed repeatedcrosssectionalsurveyofectoparasitesinsheepfromcentraltunisiadoeslowprevalenceindicategoodhygieneorresistancetoectoparasites