Are we missing the mark? Gender and Intersectional Data Gaps in Climate Smart Agriculture
In today’s world, food is a scarce resource for millions of people. Despite numerous efforts by individuals, organizations, governments and institutions to enhance food security, the World Health Organization (WHO) conservatively estimates that between 2030 and 2050 climate change is expected to cau...
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Blog Post |
| Lenguaje: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
AgriLinks
2024
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/168504 |
| _version_ | 1855541451257020416 |
|---|---|
| author | CARE International |
| author_browse | CARE International |
| author_facet | CARE International |
| author_sort | CARE International |
| collection | Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace) |
| description | In today’s world, food is a scarce resource for millions of people. Despite numerous efforts by individuals, organizations, governments and institutions to enhance food security, the World Health Organization (WHO) conservatively estimates that between 2030 and 2050 climate change is expected to cause approximately 250,000 deaths per year resulting from malnutrition, diarrhea and heat stress (WHO 2021). Women and girls often face the most severe impacts of food insecurity caused by climate change, often eating last and least. CARE’s analysis has estimated that 150 million more women were hungry than men in 2021 (CARE 2022).
To address global food insecurity, Climate-Smart Agriculture (CSA) has emerged as a paradigm aimed at enhancing agricultural productivity, resilience and sustainability. Over time, CSA has been adopted by development partners and governments across the globe. But does it really deliver its promises to the most vulnerable?
The CSA framework, as initially defined, includes three main objectives: (i) to sustainably enhance agricultural productivity and improve food security, (ii) to strengthen farmers’ resilience and their capacities to adapt to climate change, and (iii) to minimize or eliminate greenhouse gas emissions whenever feasible (FAO 2013; FAO and CARE 2019). Gender equality was not a primary focus during the development of CSA strategies, which may account for the limited investment in gender-equality initiatives within CSA programming. As a result, international agricultural research and development organizations have faced challenges in effectively incorporating gender-equality considerations into agricultural program processes and outcomes. |
| format | Blog Post |
| id | CGSpace168504 |
| institution | CGIAR Consortium |
| language | Inglés |
| publishDate | 2024 |
| publishDateRange | 2024 |
| publishDateSort | 2024 |
| publisher | AgriLinks |
| publisherStr | AgriLinks |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | CGSpace1685042025-12-08T09:54:28Z Are we missing the mark? Gender and Intersectional Data Gaps in Climate Smart Agriculture CARE International climate-smart agriculture gender In today’s world, food is a scarce resource for millions of people. Despite numerous efforts by individuals, organizations, governments and institutions to enhance food security, the World Health Organization (WHO) conservatively estimates that between 2030 and 2050 climate change is expected to cause approximately 250,000 deaths per year resulting from malnutrition, diarrhea and heat stress (WHO 2021). Women and girls often face the most severe impacts of food insecurity caused by climate change, often eating last and least. CARE’s analysis has estimated that 150 million more women were hungry than men in 2021 (CARE 2022). To address global food insecurity, Climate-Smart Agriculture (CSA) has emerged as a paradigm aimed at enhancing agricultural productivity, resilience and sustainability. Over time, CSA has been adopted by development partners and governments across the globe. But does it really deliver its promises to the most vulnerable? The CSA framework, as initially defined, includes three main objectives: (i) to sustainably enhance agricultural productivity and improve food security, (ii) to strengthen farmers’ resilience and their capacities to adapt to climate change, and (iii) to minimize or eliminate greenhouse gas emissions whenever feasible (FAO 2013; FAO and CARE 2019). Gender equality was not a primary focus during the development of CSA strategies, which may account for the limited investment in gender-equality initiatives within CSA programming. As a result, international agricultural research and development organizations have faced challenges in effectively incorporating gender-equality considerations into agricultural program processes and outcomes. 2024-11-13 2025-01-03T15:35:10Z 2025-01-03T15:35:10Z Blog Post https://hdl.handle.net/10568/168504 en Open Access application/pdf AgriLinks CARE International. 2024. Are We Missing the Mark? Gender and Intersectional Data Gaps in Climate Smart Agriculture. CARE International. |
| spellingShingle | climate-smart agriculture gender CARE International Are we missing the mark? Gender and Intersectional Data Gaps in Climate Smart Agriculture |
| title | Are we missing the mark? Gender and Intersectional Data Gaps in Climate Smart Agriculture |
| title_full | Are we missing the mark? Gender and Intersectional Data Gaps in Climate Smart Agriculture |
| title_fullStr | Are we missing the mark? Gender and Intersectional Data Gaps in Climate Smart Agriculture |
| title_full_unstemmed | Are we missing the mark? Gender and Intersectional Data Gaps in Climate Smart Agriculture |
| title_short | Are we missing the mark? Gender and Intersectional Data Gaps in Climate Smart Agriculture |
| title_sort | are we missing the mark gender and intersectional data gaps in climate smart agriculture |
| topic | climate-smart agriculture gender |
| url | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/168504 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT careinternational arewemissingthemarkgenderandintersectionaldatagapsinclimatesmartagriculture |