Intra-personal Conflict Strategies
The Measures for Advancing Gender Equality (MAGNET) initiative aims to broaden and deepen the measurement of women’s agency, based on the development of new tools and rigorous testing and comparison of both new and existing methods for measuring agency, and promoting the adoption of these measures a...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Conjunto de datos |
| Language: | Inglés |
| Published: |
International Food Policy Research Institute
2024
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/168065 |
| _version_ | 1855513331643711488 |
|---|---|
| author | Measures for Advancing Gender Equality (MAGNET) Initiative |
| author_browse | Measures for Advancing Gender Equality (MAGNET) Initiative |
| author_facet | Measures for Advancing Gender Equality (MAGNET) Initiative |
| author_sort | Measures for Advancing Gender Equality (MAGNET) Initiative |
| collection | Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace) |
| description | The Measures for Advancing Gender Equality (MAGNET) initiative aims to broaden and deepen the measurement of women’s agency, based on the development of new tools and rigorous testing and comparison of both new and existing methods for measuring agency, and promoting the adoption of these measures at scale. By increasing the availability of innovative meaningful measures of agency for a broad range of contexts, we hope our work will lead to an improved understanding of what women’s agency is, how it manifests and how it can best be measured across contexts given the research question at hand. Evidence suggests the process of decision-making itself—in addition to the final outcome—has important implications for households. This tool, Intra-personal Conflict Strategies, aims to deepen our understanding of how decisions are made when spouses have different preferences or constraints. When household members agree on the decision (regardless of the motivations), the decision-making process is relatively simple to understand. But when differences in opinions arise, the intrahousehold decision-making process can be more complex. It is important to understand differences in intra-personal conflict styles and how these differences impact the decision-making outcomes within the household. This tool uses vignettes aimed to capture five potential conflict strategies in which individuals may engage (avoidance, dominance, compromise, obliging, and collaboration). The vignettes build on Rahim ’s (1983) Model of Conflict Management styles for interpersonal conflicts, which is widely used to assess conflict behavior of individuals across five styles: (1) Avoidance, (2) Dominance, (3) Compromise, (4) Obliging, and (5) Collaboration. This information could be used to develop appropriate interventions that recognize the various types of conflict strategies people in a given area use within household decision-making. It may also be used to characterize household types for further analysis.
This data study includes following files.
1. A survey document (including implementation guidelines) |
| format | Conjunto de datos |
| id | CGSpace168065 |
| institution | CGIAR Consortium |
| language | Inglés |
| publishDate | 2024 |
| publishDateRange | 2024 |
| publishDateSort | 2024 |
| publisher | International Food Policy Research Institute |
| publisherStr | International Food Policy Research Institute |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | CGSpace1680652024-12-19T15:41:00Z Intra-personal Conflict Strategies Measures for Advancing Gender Equality (MAGNET) Initiative gender equality women women's empowerment conflicts data collection research survey methods households The Measures for Advancing Gender Equality (MAGNET) initiative aims to broaden and deepen the measurement of women’s agency, based on the development of new tools and rigorous testing and comparison of both new and existing methods for measuring agency, and promoting the adoption of these measures at scale. By increasing the availability of innovative meaningful measures of agency for a broad range of contexts, we hope our work will lead to an improved understanding of what women’s agency is, how it manifests and how it can best be measured across contexts given the research question at hand. Evidence suggests the process of decision-making itself—in addition to the final outcome—has important implications for households. This tool, Intra-personal Conflict Strategies, aims to deepen our understanding of how decisions are made when spouses have different preferences or constraints. When household members agree on the decision (regardless of the motivations), the decision-making process is relatively simple to understand. But when differences in opinions arise, the intrahousehold decision-making process can be more complex. It is important to understand differences in intra-personal conflict styles and how these differences impact the decision-making outcomes within the household. This tool uses vignettes aimed to capture five potential conflict strategies in which individuals may engage (avoidance, dominance, compromise, obliging, and collaboration). The vignettes build on Rahim ’s (1983) Model of Conflict Management styles for interpersonal conflicts, which is widely used to assess conflict behavior of individuals across five styles: (1) Avoidance, (2) Dominance, (3) Compromise, (4) Obliging, and (5) Collaboration. This information could be used to develop appropriate interventions that recognize the various types of conflict strategies people in a given area use within household decision-making. It may also be used to characterize household types for further analysis. This data study includes following files. 1. A survey document (including implementation guidelines) 2024-04-15 2024-12-19T15:40:59Z 2024-12-19T15:40:59Z Dataset https://hdl.handle.net/10568/168065 en http://hdl.handle.net/10986/36272 Open Access International Food Policy Research Institute Measures for Advancing Gender Equality (MAGNET) Initiative. 2024. Intra-personal Conflict Strategies. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) [dataset]. https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/LY4OZN. Harvard Dataverse. Version 2. |
| spellingShingle | gender equality women women's empowerment conflicts data collection research survey methods households Measures for Advancing Gender Equality (MAGNET) Initiative Intra-personal Conflict Strategies |
| title | Intra-personal Conflict Strategies |
| title_full | Intra-personal Conflict Strategies |
| title_fullStr | Intra-personal Conflict Strategies |
| title_full_unstemmed | Intra-personal Conflict Strategies |
| title_short | Intra-personal Conflict Strategies |
| title_sort | intra personal conflict strategies |
| topic | gender equality women women's empowerment conflicts data collection research survey methods households |
| url | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/168065 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT measuresforadvancinggenderequalitymagnetinitiative intrapersonalconflictstrategies |