Comparison Between Free-Choice and No-Choice Seedling Bulk Tests for Evaluating Resistance of Rice Cultivars to the Whitebacked Planthopper

During a screening of rice, Oryza sativa L., cultivars for resistance to the whitebacked planthopper Sogatella furcifera (Horváth) by the routinely used free‐choice seedling bulk test, a significantly higher insect population was observed to move over to the susceptible check cultivar soon after inf...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Saxena, R.C., Khan, Z.R.
Format: Journal Article
Language:Inglés
Published: Wiley 1984
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/167804
_version_ 1855514683397636096
author Saxena, R.C.
Khan, Z.R.
author_browse Khan, Z.R.
Saxena, R.C.
author_facet Saxena, R.C.
Khan, Z.R.
author_sort Saxena, R.C.
collection Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace)
description During a screening of rice, Oryza sativa L., cultivars for resistance to the whitebacked planthopper Sogatella furcifera (Horváth) by the routinely used free‐choice seedling bulk test, a significantly higher insect population was observed to move over to the susceptible check cultivar soon after infestation. This uneven distribution of insects caused unbalanced infestation among the test cultivars. To avoid this shortcoming, a no‐choice seedling bulk test was conducted in which each row of test cultivar seedlings was excluded from the other by an intervening, vertical, mylar plastic partition, and was exposed to equal insect infestation. The resistance scores of 10 genetically diverse cultivars—‘Muskhan 41’ (Wbph 1), ‘N22’ (Wbph 1), ‘N32’ (Wbph 1), ‘ARC 10239’ (Wbph 2), ‘ADR 52’ (Wbph 3), ‘Podiwi A8’ (wbph 4), ‘Colombo’ (Wbph 2 + 1 recessive ?), ‘WC 1240’ (Wbph I + 1 recessive ?), ‘1R 2035‐117‐3’ (Wbph 1 + Wbph 2), and ‘Taichung Native 1’ (no resistance gene)—from free‐choice and no‐choice seedling bulk tests were compared. Podiwi A8 and N22, rated as moderately resistant and resistant in the free‐choice test, proved to be susceptible and moderately resistant, respectively, in the no‐choice test.The no‐choice test ensures an even distribution of test insects on cultivars and excludes any possibility of their escape from infestation. The technique has important implications in screening for resistance against a number of mobile insect pest species on a wide variety of plants.
format Journal Article
id CGSpace167804
institution CGIAR Consortium
language Inglés
publishDate 1984
publishDateRange 1984
publishDateSort 1984
publisher Wiley
publisherStr Wiley
record_format dspace
spelling CGSpace1678042025-05-14T10:39:28Z Comparison Between Free-Choice and No-Choice Seedling Bulk Tests for Evaluating Resistance of Rice Cultivars to the Whitebacked Planthopper Saxena, R.C. Khan, Z.R. seedling bulk tests resistance cultivars sogatella furcifera During a screening of rice, Oryza sativa L., cultivars for resistance to the whitebacked planthopper Sogatella furcifera (Horváth) by the routinely used free‐choice seedling bulk test, a significantly higher insect population was observed to move over to the susceptible check cultivar soon after infestation. This uneven distribution of insects caused unbalanced infestation among the test cultivars. To avoid this shortcoming, a no‐choice seedling bulk test was conducted in which each row of test cultivar seedlings was excluded from the other by an intervening, vertical, mylar plastic partition, and was exposed to equal insect infestation. The resistance scores of 10 genetically diverse cultivars—‘Muskhan 41’ (Wbph 1), ‘N22’ (Wbph 1), ‘N32’ (Wbph 1), ‘ARC 10239’ (Wbph 2), ‘ADR 52’ (Wbph 3), ‘Podiwi A8’ (wbph 4), ‘Colombo’ (Wbph 2 + 1 recessive ?), ‘WC 1240’ (Wbph I + 1 recessive ?), ‘1R 2035‐117‐3’ (Wbph 1 + Wbph 2), and ‘Taichung Native 1’ (no resistance gene)—from free‐choice and no‐choice seedling bulk tests were compared. Podiwi A8 and N22, rated as moderately resistant and resistant in the free‐choice test, proved to be susceptible and moderately resistant, respectively, in the no‐choice test.The no‐choice test ensures an even distribution of test insects on cultivars and excludes any possibility of their escape from infestation. The technique has important implications in screening for resistance against a number of mobile insect pest species on a wide variety of plants. 1984-11 2024-12-19T12:57:44Z 2024-12-19T12:57:44Z Journal Article https://hdl.handle.net/10568/167804 en Wiley Saxena, R. C.; Khan, Z. R. 1984. Comparison Between Free-Choice and No-Choice Seedling Bulk Tests for Evaluating Resistance of Rice Cultivars to the Whitebacked Planthopper. Crop Science, Volume 24 no. 6 p. 1204-1206
spellingShingle seedling bulk tests
resistance
cultivars
sogatella furcifera
Saxena, R.C.
Khan, Z.R.
Comparison Between Free-Choice and No-Choice Seedling Bulk Tests for Evaluating Resistance of Rice Cultivars to the Whitebacked Planthopper
title Comparison Between Free-Choice and No-Choice Seedling Bulk Tests for Evaluating Resistance of Rice Cultivars to the Whitebacked Planthopper
title_full Comparison Between Free-Choice and No-Choice Seedling Bulk Tests for Evaluating Resistance of Rice Cultivars to the Whitebacked Planthopper
title_fullStr Comparison Between Free-Choice and No-Choice Seedling Bulk Tests for Evaluating Resistance of Rice Cultivars to the Whitebacked Planthopper
title_full_unstemmed Comparison Between Free-Choice and No-Choice Seedling Bulk Tests for Evaluating Resistance of Rice Cultivars to the Whitebacked Planthopper
title_short Comparison Between Free-Choice and No-Choice Seedling Bulk Tests for Evaluating Resistance of Rice Cultivars to the Whitebacked Planthopper
title_sort comparison between free choice and no choice seedling bulk tests for evaluating resistance of rice cultivars to the whitebacked planthopper
topic seedling bulk tests
resistance
cultivars
sogatella furcifera
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/167804
work_keys_str_mv AT saxenarc comparisonbetweenfreechoiceandnochoiceseedlingbulktestsforevaluatingresistanceofricecultivarstothewhitebackedplanthopper
AT khanzr comparisonbetweenfreechoiceandnochoiceseedlingbulktestsforevaluatingresistanceofricecultivarstothewhitebackedplanthopper