Plant Spacing, Density, And Yield Of Wheat Subjected To Postanthesis Water Deficits

The optimum planting density for Gutha wheat (Triticum aestivum L. emend. Thell.) grown in mediterranean‐type environments varies with site and season. This study investigated the influence of postanthesis water deficits on the water relations and yield of wheat sown at different plant densities wit...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Turner, Neil C., Prasertsak, Praphan, Setter, Timothy L.
Format: Journal Article
Language:Inglés
Published: Wiley 1994
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/167424
_version_ 1855536300762857472
author Turner, Neil C.
Prasertsak, Praphan
Setter, Timothy L.
author_browse Prasertsak, Praphan
Setter, Timothy L.
Turner, Neil C.
author_facet Turner, Neil C.
Prasertsak, Praphan
Setter, Timothy L.
author_sort Turner, Neil C.
collection Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace)
description The optimum planting density for Gutha wheat (Triticum aestivum L. emend. Thell.) grown in mediterranean‐type environments varies with site and season. This study investigated the influence of postanthesis water deficits on the water relations and yield of wheat sown at different plant densities with even and uneven plant densities along the row. Unevenness of machine planting resulted in a yield reduction of 20% compared with evenly spaced plants in plants subjected to postanthesis water deficits, but no yield reduction was observed in irrigated wheat. Wheat at high densities (100 and 200 plants m‐2) developed lower leaf and ear water potentials than plants at low densities (25 and 50 plants m‐2) during postanthesis water deficits. The greater deficits, however, did not reduce yields. Grain yields were generally lower at densities of 25 and 50 plants per square meter than at 200 plants per square meter when postanthesis water deficits developed, but not when irrigated. The later‐formed tillers (Tillers 2, 3 and 4), which were only produced at low densities, had smaller thousand‐grain weights compared to those of the mainstem and the first tiller when water deficits were induced during the postanthesis period. The delay in anthesis in the later‐formed tillers was up to 20 d and this resulted in grain fill occurring at low leaf and ear water potentials. We conclude that reducing the density of palnts to reduce water use may decrease rather than increase wheat yield under water limited conditions.
format Journal Article
id CGSpace167424
institution CGIAR Consortium
language Inglés
publishDate 1994
publishDateRange 1994
publishDateSort 1994
publisher Wiley
publisherStr Wiley
record_format dspace
spelling CGSpace1674242025-12-08T09:54:28Z Plant Spacing, Density, And Yield Of Wheat Subjected To Postanthesis Water Deficits Turner, Neil C. Prasertsak, Praphan Setter, Timothy L. The optimum planting density for Gutha wheat (Triticum aestivum L. emend. Thell.) grown in mediterranean‐type environments varies with site and season. This study investigated the influence of postanthesis water deficits on the water relations and yield of wheat sown at different plant densities with even and uneven plant densities along the row. Unevenness of machine planting resulted in a yield reduction of 20% compared with evenly spaced plants in plants subjected to postanthesis water deficits, but no yield reduction was observed in irrigated wheat. Wheat at high densities (100 and 200 plants m‐2) developed lower leaf and ear water potentials than plants at low densities (25 and 50 plants m‐2) during postanthesis water deficits. The greater deficits, however, did not reduce yields. Grain yields were generally lower at densities of 25 and 50 plants per square meter than at 200 plants per square meter when postanthesis water deficits developed, but not when irrigated. The later‐formed tillers (Tillers 2, 3 and 4), which were only produced at low densities, had smaller thousand‐grain weights compared to those of the mainstem and the first tiller when water deficits were induced during the postanthesis period. The delay in anthesis in the later‐formed tillers was up to 20 d and this resulted in grain fill occurring at low leaf and ear water potentials. We conclude that reducing the density of palnts to reduce water use may decrease rather than increase wheat yield under water limited conditions. 1994-05 2024-12-19T12:57:22Z 2024-12-19T12:57:22Z Journal Article https://hdl.handle.net/10568/167424 en Wiley Turner, Neil C.; Prasertsak, Praphan and Setter, Timothy L. 1994. Plant Spacing, Density, And Yield Of Wheat Subjected To Postanthesis Water Deficits. Crop Science, Volume 34 no. 3 p. 741-748
spellingShingle Turner, Neil C.
Prasertsak, Praphan
Setter, Timothy L.
Plant Spacing, Density, And Yield Of Wheat Subjected To Postanthesis Water Deficits
title Plant Spacing, Density, And Yield Of Wheat Subjected To Postanthesis Water Deficits
title_full Plant Spacing, Density, And Yield Of Wheat Subjected To Postanthesis Water Deficits
title_fullStr Plant Spacing, Density, And Yield Of Wheat Subjected To Postanthesis Water Deficits
title_full_unstemmed Plant Spacing, Density, And Yield Of Wheat Subjected To Postanthesis Water Deficits
title_short Plant Spacing, Density, And Yield Of Wheat Subjected To Postanthesis Water Deficits
title_sort plant spacing density and yield of wheat subjected to postanthesis water deficits
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/167424
work_keys_str_mv AT turnerneilc plantspacingdensityandyieldofwheatsubjectedtopostanthesiswaterdeficits
AT prasertsakpraphan plantspacingdensityandyieldofwheatsubjectedtopostanthesiswaterdeficits
AT settertimothyl plantspacingdensityandyieldofwheatsubjectedtopostanthesiswaterdeficits