Fertilizer placement affects weed growth and grain yield in dry-seeded rice (Oryza sativa L.) systems.

A study was conducted in a split-plot design to evaluate the effect of fertilizer placement method on weed growth and grain yield in a dry-seeded rice (DSR) system. Main-plot treatments were four fertilizer placement methods: between narrow rows (between 15-cm-wide rows of the pattern 25-15-25 cm),...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chauhan, Bhagirath S., Abugho, Seth B.
Format: Journal Article
Language:Inglés
Published: Scientific Research Publishing, Inc. 2013
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/165709
_version_ 1855524374342270976
author Chauhan, Bhagirath S.
Abugho, Seth B.
author_browse Abugho, Seth B.
Chauhan, Bhagirath S.
author_facet Chauhan, Bhagirath S.
Abugho, Seth B.
author_sort Chauhan, Bhagirath S.
collection Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace)
description A study was conducted in a split-plot design to evaluate the effect of fertilizer placement method on weed growth and grain yield in a dry-seeded rice (DSR) system. Main-plot treatments were four fertilizer placement methods: between narrow rows (between 15-cm-wide rows of the pattern 25-15-25 cm), between uniform rows (between 20-cm-wide rows), within uniform rows, and surface broadcast. Subplot treatments were three weed control methods: herbicide-treated, nontreated, and weed-free. Weed biomass was greater in the nontreated plots than in the herbicide-treated plots. Herbicide application reduced weed biomass by 89% to 99% compared with the nontreated control. Fertilizer placement did not influence weed biomass in the herbicide-treated plots; however, it greatly influenced biomass in the nontreated plots. Fertilizer placement on the surface increased weed biomass (69 -71 g·m–2) compared with the placement of fertilizer below the soil surface (37 -57 g·m–2). Fertilizer placement did not influence weed density and biomass at 60 days after planting. Nontreated plots yielded 700 to 2080 kg·ha–1. Grain yield was similar between the herbicide-treated (2660-3250 kg·ha–1) and weed-free (2620-3430 kg·ha–1) plots. Grain yield was not influenced when basal fertilizer was banded within (2390-2500 kg·ha–1) or between rows (2530-2650 kg·ha–1). However, grain yield decreased when basal fertilizer was broadcast on the soil surface (2200 kg·ha–1). The results of our study demonstrated that rice yield was usually lower with surface broadcast of fertilizer than with subsurface fertilizer treatments. In conclusion, surface broadcast of basal fertilizer may result in high weed pressure in DSR systems.
format Journal Article
id CGSpace165709
institution CGIAR Consortium
language Inglés
publishDate 2013
publishDateRange 2013
publishDateSort 2013
publisher Scientific Research Publishing, Inc.
publisherStr Scientific Research Publishing, Inc.
record_format dspace
spelling CGSpace1657092024-12-19T14:12:31Z Fertilizer placement affects weed growth and grain yield in dry-seeded rice (Oryza sativa L.) systems. Chauhan, Bhagirath S. Abugho, Seth B. fertilizers biomass chemical control field size grain yield growth herbicides weed control weeds A study was conducted in a split-plot design to evaluate the effect of fertilizer placement method on weed growth and grain yield in a dry-seeded rice (DSR) system. Main-plot treatments were four fertilizer placement methods: between narrow rows (between 15-cm-wide rows of the pattern 25-15-25 cm), between uniform rows (between 20-cm-wide rows), within uniform rows, and surface broadcast. Subplot treatments were three weed control methods: herbicide-treated, nontreated, and weed-free. Weed biomass was greater in the nontreated plots than in the herbicide-treated plots. Herbicide application reduced weed biomass by 89% to 99% compared with the nontreated control. Fertilizer placement did not influence weed biomass in the herbicide-treated plots; however, it greatly influenced biomass in the nontreated plots. Fertilizer placement on the surface increased weed biomass (69 -71 g·m–2) compared with the placement of fertilizer below the soil surface (37 -57 g·m–2). Fertilizer placement did not influence weed density and biomass at 60 days after planting. Nontreated plots yielded 700 to 2080 kg·ha–1. Grain yield was similar between the herbicide-treated (2660-3250 kg·ha–1) and weed-free (2620-3430 kg·ha–1) plots. Grain yield was not influenced when basal fertilizer was banded within (2390-2500 kg·ha–1) or between rows (2530-2650 kg·ha–1). However, grain yield decreased when basal fertilizer was broadcast on the soil surface (2200 kg·ha–1). The results of our study demonstrated that rice yield was usually lower with surface broadcast of fertilizer than with subsurface fertilizer treatments. In conclusion, surface broadcast of basal fertilizer may result in high weed pressure in DSR systems. 2013 2024-12-19T12:55:23Z 2024-12-19T12:55:23Z Journal Article https://hdl.handle.net/10568/165709 en Open Access Scientific Research Publishing, Inc. Chauhan, Bhagirath S.; Abugho, Seth B. 2013. Fertilizer placement affects weed growth and grain yield in dry-seeded rice (Oryza sativa L.) systems. AJPS, Volume 04 no. 06 p. 1260-1264
spellingShingle fertilizers
biomass
chemical control
field size
grain yield
growth
herbicides
weed control
weeds
Chauhan, Bhagirath S.
Abugho, Seth B.
Fertilizer placement affects weed growth and grain yield in dry-seeded rice (Oryza sativa L.) systems.
title Fertilizer placement affects weed growth and grain yield in dry-seeded rice (Oryza sativa L.) systems.
title_full Fertilizer placement affects weed growth and grain yield in dry-seeded rice (Oryza sativa L.) systems.
title_fullStr Fertilizer placement affects weed growth and grain yield in dry-seeded rice (Oryza sativa L.) systems.
title_full_unstemmed Fertilizer placement affects weed growth and grain yield in dry-seeded rice (Oryza sativa L.) systems.
title_short Fertilizer placement affects weed growth and grain yield in dry-seeded rice (Oryza sativa L.) systems.
title_sort fertilizer placement affects weed growth and grain yield in dry seeded rice oryza sativa l systems
topic fertilizers
biomass
chemical control
field size
grain yield
growth
herbicides
weed control
weeds
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/165709
work_keys_str_mv AT chauhanbhagiraths fertilizerplacementaffectsweedgrowthandgrainyieldindryseededriceoryzasativalsystems
AT abughosethb fertilizerplacementaffectsweedgrowthandgrainyieldindryseededriceoryzasativalsystems