Effect of different irrigation and tillage methods on yield and resource use efficiency of boro rice (Oryza sativa)

An experiment was carried out in Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute (BARI) farm during 2010-11 to evaluate yield and resource use efficiency of transplanted boro rice under two tillage and three irrigation methods. Two tillage methods viz., conventional tillage with puddle transplanted rice...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Karim, MR, Alam, MM, Ladha, JK, Islam, MS, Islam, MR
Formato: Journal Article
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: Bangladesh Academy of Sciences 2014
Acceso en línea:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/165489
_version_ 1855520143491203072
author Karim, MR
Alam, MM
Ladha, JK
Islam, MS
Islam, MR
author_browse Alam, MM
Islam, MR
Islam, MS
Karim, MR
Ladha, JK
author_facet Karim, MR
Alam, MM
Ladha, JK
Islam, MS
Islam, MR
author_sort Karim, MR
collection Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace)
description An experiment was carried out in Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute (BARI) farm during 2010-11 to evaluate yield and resource use efficiency of transplanted boro rice under two tillage and three irrigation methods. Two tillage methods viz., conventional tillage with puddle transplanted rice and reduced tillage unpuddled transplanted rice and three irrigation methods viz., sprinkler irrigation, alternate wetting and drying (AWD) and flood irrigation were used as treatment variables. Grain yield was 7.62% higher in sprinkler and 4.72% higher in AWD irrigation method over flood irrigation method. Irrespective of tillage methods, reduced tillage method holds 4.62% higher yield production over conventional tillage method. Water use efficiency was found highest in sprinkler irrigation method (0.83 kg/m3) and in reduced tillage method (0.773 kg/m3). Labour required for land preparation was 15 md/ha in reduced tillage, whereas it was 38 md/ha in conventional tillage method. Seedling uprooting and transplanting required higher labour in reduced tillage method over conventional tillage. Fuel consumptions (49.78 l/ha) and electricity (3475.11 Kwhr/ha) was also less in reduced tillage method. Reduced tillage had less land preparation and fuel cost over conventional tillage method. But seedling uprooting and transplanting cost was higher in reduced tillage. Irrigation and total cost of production was 7753 Tk./ha and 69972 Tk./ha in Sprinkler × RT method. Benefit cost ratio was also higher in sprinkler irrigation (1.81) and reduced tillage method (1.82). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/bjar.v39i1.20165 Bangladesh J. Agril. Res. 39(1): 151-163, March 2014
format Journal Article
id CGSpace165489
institution CGIAR Consortium
language Inglés
publishDate 2014
publishDateRange 2014
publishDateSort 2014
publisher Bangladesh Academy of Sciences
publisherStr Bangladesh Academy of Sciences
record_format dspace
spelling CGSpace1654892026-01-06T12:03:45Z Effect of different irrigation and tillage methods on yield and resource use efficiency of boro rice (Oryza sativa) Karim, MR Alam, MM Ladha, JK Islam, MS Islam, MR An experiment was carried out in Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute (BARI) farm during 2010-11 to evaluate yield and resource use efficiency of transplanted boro rice under two tillage and three irrigation methods. Two tillage methods viz., conventional tillage with puddle transplanted rice and reduced tillage unpuddled transplanted rice and three irrigation methods viz., sprinkler irrigation, alternate wetting and drying (AWD) and flood irrigation were used as treatment variables. Grain yield was 7.62% higher in sprinkler and 4.72% higher in AWD irrigation method over flood irrigation method. Irrespective of tillage methods, reduced tillage method holds 4.62% higher yield production over conventional tillage method. Water use efficiency was found highest in sprinkler irrigation method (0.83 kg/m3) and in reduced tillage method (0.773 kg/m3). Labour required for land preparation was 15 md/ha in reduced tillage, whereas it was 38 md/ha in conventional tillage method. Seedling uprooting and transplanting required higher labour in reduced tillage method over conventional tillage. Fuel consumptions (49.78 l/ha) and electricity (3475.11 Kwhr/ha) was also less in reduced tillage method. Reduced tillage had less land preparation and fuel cost over conventional tillage method. But seedling uprooting and transplanting cost was higher in reduced tillage. Irrigation and total cost of production was 7753 Tk./ha and 69972 Tk./ha in Sprinkler × RT method. Benefit cost ratio was also higher in sprinkler irrigation (1.81) and reduced tillage method (1.82). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/bjar.v39i1.20165 Bangladesh J. Agril. Res. 39(1): 151-163, March 2014 2014-08-25 2024-12-19T12:55:08Z 2024-12-19T12:55:08Z Journal Article https://hdl.handle.net/10568/165489 en Bangladesh Academy of Sciences Islam, MR. 2014. Effect of different irrigation and tillage methods on yield and resource use efficiency of boro rice (Oryza sativa). Bangladesh J. Agric. Res, Volume 39 no. 1 p. 151-163
spellingShingle Karim, MR
Alam, MM
Ladha, JK
Islam, MS
Islam, MR
Effect of different irrigation and tillage methods on yield and resource use efficiency of boro rice (Oryza sativa)
title Effect of different irrigation and tillage methods on yield and resource use efficiency of boro rice (Oryza sativa)
title_full Effect of different irrigation and tillage methods on yield and resource use efficiency of boro rice (Oryza sativa)
title_fullStr Effect of different irrigation and tillage methods on yield and resource use efficiency of boro rice (Oryza sativa)
title_full_unstemmed Effect of different irrigation and tillage methods on yield and resource use efficiency of boro rice (Oryza sativa)
title_short Effect of different irrigation and tillage methods on yield and resource use efficiency of boro rice (Oryza sativa)
title_sort effect of different irrigation and tillage methods on yield and resource use efficiency of boro rice oryza sativa
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/165489
work_keys_str_mv AT karimmr effectofdifferentirrigationandtillagemethodsonyieldandresourceuseefficiencyofbororiceoryzasativa
AT alammm effectofdifferentirrigationandtillagemethodsonyieldandresourceuseefficiencyofbororiceoryzasativa
AT ladhajk effectofdifferentirrigationandtillagemethodsonyieldandresourceuseefficiencyofbororiceoryzasativa
AT islamms effectofdifferentirrigationandtillagemethodsonyieldandresourceuseefficiencyofbororiceoryzasativa
AT islammr effectofdifferentirrigationandtillagemethodsonyieldandresourceuseefficiencyofbororiceoryzasativa