The bittersweet economics of different cacao production systems in Colombia, Ecuador and Peru
Cacao production takes place in diverse environments and agricultural systems, with its performance and income generation potential depending on multiple contextual factors. The crop has been promoted among smallholders in South America as a driver for sustainable rural development, but a systematic...
| Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Journal Article |
| Lenguaje: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
Elsevier
2025
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/163502 |
| _version_ | 1855522637503004672 |
|---|---|
| author | Charry, Andres Perea, Carolay Ramírez, Karen Zambrano, Guillermo Yovera, Fredy Santos, Adriana Jimenez, Tito Romero, Miguel Lundy, Mark Quintero, Marcela Pulleman, Mirjam |
| author_browse | Charry, Andres Jimenez, Tito Lundy, Mark Perea, Carolay Pulleman, Mirjam Quintero, Marcela Ramírez, Karen Romero, Miguel Santos, Adriana Yovera, Fredy Zambrano, Guillermo |
| author_facet | Charry, Andres Perea, Carolay Ramírez, Karen Zambrano, Guillermo Yovera, Fredy Santos, Adriana Jimenez, Tito Romero, Miguel Lundy, Mark Quintero, Marcela Pulleman, Mirjam |
| author_sort | Charry, Andres |
| collection | Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace) |
| description | Cacao production takes place in diverse environments and agricultural systems, with its performance and income generation potential depending on multiple contextual factors. The crop has been promoted among smallholders in South America as a driver for sustainable rural development, but a systematic comparison of the economic performance of diverse cacao production systems in this region was missing, which led to a lack of consistency and clarity on the conditions that enable the crops' success in terms of profitability and income generation for farmers.
OBJECTIVE
We aimed to understand the economic performance of different cacao production systems from Colombia, Ecuador and Perú, and the factors that affect their profitability and income generation potential with regards to poverty and living income benchmarks under varying contexts.
METHODS
We employed the ‘typical farm approach’ to perform a comparative analysis of fifteen different cacao production systems from six distinct agroecological regions from Colombia, Ecuador and Perú.
RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS
Eight out of the fifteen systems analyzed were found to be economically viable, while the remaining systems generate considerable losses. Positive outcomes depend on a combination of factors including sufficient prices, yields and land availability, adequate labor allocation, timely diversification, subsidies and low costs of productive factors. Considering those factors, we identified minimum conditions for achieving profitability and living incomes.
SIGNIFICANCE
Our findings provide essential information to decision makers on the limitations of cacao productive systems for achieving a living income, as well as the type of diversification, minimum prices, area and yields that could enhance their economic sustainability. Based on our findings, we discuss the relevance of subsidies for improving the system's performance. Finally, we suggest the use of different indicators and standardized assumptions to allow more reliable comparisons between cacao production systems. |
| format | Journal Article |
| id | CGSpace163502 |
| institution | CGIAR Consortium |
| language | Inglés |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| publishDateRange | 2025 |
| publishDateSort | 2025 |
| publisher | Elsevier |
| publisherStr | Elsevier |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | CGSpace1635022025-12-08T10:11:39Z The bittersweet economics of different cacao production systems in Colombia, Ecuador and Peru Charry, Andres Perea, Carolay Ramírez, Karen Zambrano, Guillermo Yovera, Fredy Santos, Adriana Jimenez, Tito Romero, Miguel Lundy, Mark Quintero, Marcela Pulleman, Mirjam diversification diversificación smallholders economic analysis análisis económico income cost benefit analysis farms living standards renta-ingresos análisis de costos y beneficios Cacao production takes place in diverse environments and agricultural systems, with its performance and income generation potential depending on multiple contextual factors. The crop has been promoted among smallholders in South America as a driver for sustainable rural development, but a systematic comparison of the economic performance of diverse cacao production systems in this region was missing, which led to a lack of consistency and clarity on the conditions that enable the crops' success in terms of profitability and income generation for farmers. OBJECTIVE We aimed to understand the economic performance of different cacao production systems from Colombia, Ecuador and Perú, and the factors that affect their profitability and income generation potential with regards to poverty and living income benchmarks under varying contexts. METHODS We employed the ‘typical farm approach’ to perform a comparative analysis of fifteen different cacao production systems from six distinct agroecological regions from Colombia, Ecuador and Perú. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS Eight out of the fifteen systems analyzed were found to be economically viable, while the remaining systems generate considerable losses. Positive outcomes depend on a combination of factors including sufficient prices, yields and land availability, adequate labor allocation, timely diversification, subsidies and low costs of productive factors. Considering those factors, we identified minimum conditions for achieving profitability and living incomes. SIGNIFICANCE Our findings provide essential information to decision makers on the limitations of cacao productive systems for achieving a living income, as well as the type of diversification, minimum prices, area and yields that could enhance their economic sustainability. Based on our findings, we discuss the relevance of subsidies for improving the system's performance. Finally, we suggest the use of different indicators and standardized assumptions to allow more reliable comparisons between cacao production systems. 2025-03 2024-12-15T11:01:55Z 2024-12-15T11:01:55Z Journal Article https://hdl.handle.net/10568/163502 en Open Access application/pdf Elsevier Charry, A.; Perea, C.; Ramírez, K.; Zambrano, G.; Yovera, F.; Santos, A.; Jimenez, T.; Romero, M.; Lundy, M.; Quintero, M.; Pulleman, M. (2024) The bittersweet economics of different cacao production systems in Colombia, Ecuador and Peru. Agricultural Systems 224: 104235. ISSN: 0308-521X |
| spellingShingle | diversification diversificación smallholders economic analysis análisis económico income cost benefit analysis farms living standards renta-ingresos análisis de costos y beneficios Charry, Andres Perea, Carolay Ramírez, Karen Zambrano, Guillermo Yovera, Fredy Santos, Adriana Jimenez, Tito Romero, Miguel Lundy, Mark Quintero, Marcela Pulleman, Mirjam The bittersweet economics of different cacao production systems in Colombia, Ecuador and Peru |
| title | The bittersweet economics of different cacao production systems in Colombia, Ecuador and Peru |
| title_full | The bittersweet economics of different cacao production systems in Colombia, Ecuador and Peru |
| title_fullStr | The bittersweet economics of different cacao production systems in Colombia, Ecuador and Peru |
| title_full_unstemmed | The bittersweet economics of different cacao production systems in Colombia, Ecuador and Peru |
| title_short | The bittersweet economics of different cacao production systems in Colombia, Ecuador and Peru |
| title_sort | bittersweet economics of different cacao production systems in colombia ecuador and peru |
| topic | diversification diversificación smallholders economic analysis análisis económico income cost benefit analysis farms living standards renta-ingresos análisis de costos y beneficios |
| url | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/163502 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT charryandres thebittersweeteconomicsofdifferentcacaoproductionsystemsincolombiaecuadorandperu AT pereacarolay thebittersweeteconomicsofdifferentcacaoproductionsystemsincolombiaecuadorandperu AT ramirezkaren thebittersweeteconomicsofdifferentcacaoproductionsystemsincolombiaecuadorandperu AT zambranoguillermo thebittersweeteconomicsofdifferentcacaoproductionsystemsincolombiaecuadorandperu AT yoverafredy thebittersweeteconomicsofdifferentcacaoproductionsystemsincolombiaecuadorandperu AT santosadriana thebittersweeteconomicsofdifferentcacaoproductionsystemsincolombiaecuadorandperu AT jimeneztito thebittersweeteconomicsofdifferentcacaoproductionsystemsincolombiaecuadorandperu AT romeromiguel thebittersweeteconomicsofdifferentcacaoproductionsystemsincolombiaecuadorandperu AT lundymark thebittersweeteconomicsofdifferentcacaoproductionsystemsincolombiaecuadorandperu AT quinteromarcela thebittersweeteconomicsofdifferentcacaoproductionsystemsincolombiaecuadorandperu AT pullemanmirjam thebittersweeteconomicsofdifferentcacaoproductionsystemsincolombiaecuadorandperu AT charryandres bittersweeteconomicsofdifferentcacaoproductionsystemsincolombiaecuadorandperu AT pereacarolay bittersweeteconomicsofdifferentcacaoproductionsystemsincolombiaecuadorandperu AT ramirezkaren bittersweeteconomicsofdifferentcacaoproductionsystemsincolombiaecuadorandperu AT zambranoguillermo bittersweeteconomicsofdifferentcacaoproductionsystemsincolombiaecuadorandperu AT yoverafredy bittersweeteconomicsofdifferentcacaoproductionsystemsincolombiaecuadorandperu AT santosadriana bittersweeteconomicsofdifferentcacaoproductionsystemsincolombiaecuadorandperu AT jimeneztito bittersweeteconomicsofdifferentcacaoproductionsystemsincolombiaecuadorandperu AT romeromiguel bittersweeteconomicsofdifferentcacaoproductionsystemsincolombiaecuadorandperu AT lundymark bittersweeteconomicsofdifferentcacaoproductionsystemsincolombiaecuadorandperu AT quinteromarcela bittersweeteconomicsofdifferentcacaoproductionsystemsincolombiaecuadorandperu AT pullemanmirjam bittersweeteconomicsofdifferentcacaoproductionsystemsincolombiaecuadorandperu |