What labelling policy for consumer choice?: The case of genetically modified food in Canada and Europe
Abstract. Faced with divergent opinions among consumers on the use of genetically modified (GM) foods, Canada has adopted a voluntary labelling approach for non‐GM foods, whereas the European Union has a mandatory labelling policy for GM foods. Interestingly, both labelling systems have resulted in...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Language: | Inglés |
| Published: |
Wiley
2008
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/162384 |
Similar Items: What labelling policy for consumer choice?: The case of genetically modified food in Canada and Europe
- Explaining international differences in genetically modified food labeling policies
- California’s proposition 37: Effects of mandatory labeling of GM food
- ‘If labels for GM food were present, would consumers trust them?’: Insights from a consumer survey in Uganda
- A preliminary comparison of the retail level effects of genetically modified food labelling policies in Canada and France
- Labeling nano-enabled consumer products
- Labeling GM food in India: Anticipating the effects on GM brinjal and rice marketing chains