Formal-informal economy linkages and unemployment in South Africa

South Africa’s high involuntary unemployment and small informal sector are attributed to an underperforming formal sector and barriers to entry in the informal sector. This paper examines the economywide linkages between the formal and informal economies while accounting for different types of infor...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Davies, Rob, Thurlow, James
Format: Artículo preliminar
Language:Inglés
Published: International Food Policy Research Institute 2009
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/161867
_version_ 1855532084024573952
author Davies, Rob
Thurlow, James
author_browse Davies, Rob
Thurlow, James
author_facet Davies, Rob
Thurlow, James
author_sort Davies, Rob
collection Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace)
description South Africa’s high involuntary unemployment and small informal sector are attributed to an underperforming formal sector and barriers to entry in the informal sector. This paper examines the economywide linkages between the formal and informal economies while accounting for different types of informal activities. A multiregion empirically calibrated general equilibrium model is developed capturing both product and labor markets. Three policy options are considered. First, results indicate that trade liberalization reduces national employment. At the same time, it increases formal employment, hurts informal producers, and favors informal traders, who benefit from lower import prices. Past liberalization may, therefore, partly explain South Africa’s small informal sector and its concentration among traders rather than producers. Second, wage subsidies on low-skilled formal workers increase national employment but hurt informal producers by heightening competition in domestic product markets. This suggests that it is insufficient to examine unemployment policies by focusing only on labor markets. Third, unconditional cash transfers stimulate demand for informally produced products, thereby raising informal employment without undermining formal producers. The transfer does, however, place a large fiscal burden on the state and is less effective at reducing national unemployment than a wage subsidy. Overall, these findings underline the importance of distinguishing between the formal and informal sector implications of socioeconomic policies.
format Artículo preliminar
id CGSpace161867
institution CGIAR Consortium
language Inglés
publishDate 2009
publishDateRange 2009
publishDateSort 2009
publisher International Food Policy Research Institute
publisherStr International Food Policy Research Institute
record_format dspace
spelling CGSpace1618672025-11-06T06:55:47Z Formal-informal economy linkages and unemployment in South Africa Davies, Rob Thurlow, James informal sector unemployment market economies labour market trade liberalization employment cash transfers wages subsidies computable general equilibrium models development policies South Africa’s high involuntary unemployment and small informal sector are attributed to an underperforming formal sector and barriers to entry in the informal sector. This paper examines the economywide linkages between the formal and informal economies while accounting for different types of informal activities. A multiregion empirically calibrated general equilibrium model is developed capturing both product and labor markets. Three policy options are considered. First, results indicate that trade liberalization reduces national employment. At the same time, it increases formal employment, hurts informal producers, and favors informal traders, who benefit from lower import prices. Past liberalization may, therefore, partly explain South Africa’s small informal sector and its concentration among traders rather than producers. Second, wage subsidies on low-skilled formal workers increase national employment but hurt informal producers by heightening competition in domestic product markets. This suggests that it is insufficient to examine unemployment policies by focusing only on labor markets. Third, unconditional cash transfers stimulate demand for informally produced products, thereby raising informal employment without undermining formal producers. The transfer does, however, place a large fiscal burden on the state and is less effective at reducing national unemployment than a wage subsidy. Overall, these findings underline the importance of distinguishing between the formal and informal sector implications of socioeconomic policies. 2009 2024-11-21T09:58:57Z 2024-11-21T09:58:57Z Working Paper https://hdl.handle.net/10568/161867 en Open Access application/pdf International Food Policy Research Institute Davies, Rob; Thurlow, James. 2009. Formal-informal economy linkages and unemployment in South Africa. IFPRI Discussion Paper 943. https://hdl.handle.net/10568/161867
spellingShingle informal sector
unemployment
market economies
labour market
trade liberalization
employment
cash transfers
wages
subsidies
computable general equilibrium models
development policies
Davies, Rob
Thurlow, James
Formal-informal economy linkages and unemployment in South Africa
title Formal-informal economy linkages and unemployment in South Africa
title_full Formal-informal economy linkages and unemployment in South Africa
title_fullStr Formal-informal economy linkages and unemployment in South Africa
title_full_unstemmed Formal-informal economy linkages and unemployment in South Africa
title_short Formal-informal economy linkages and unemployment in South Africa
title_sort formal informal economy linkages and unemployment in south africa
topic informal sector
unemployment
market economies
labour market
trade liberalization
employment
cash transfers
wages
subsidies
computable general equilibrium models
development policies
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/161867
work_keys_str_mv AT daviesrob formalinformaleconomylinkagesandunemploymentinsouthafrica
AT thurlowjames formalinformaleconomylinkagesandunemploymentinsouthafrica