Implications for Brazil of the July 2008 draft agricultural modalities

This study has shown that the proposed caps, with the exception of cotton, can constrain price suppression in situations of very low world prices. However, caps will not be effective if prices are at more normal levels. Brazil’s market access gains in developed countries are most likely to be constr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nassar, André Meloni, Cabral da Costa, Cinthia, Chiodi, Luciane
Formato: Informe técnico
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/161660
_version_ 1855524812705759232
author Nassar, André Meloni
Cabral da Costa, Cinthia
Chiodi, Luciane
author_browse Cabral da Costa, Cinthia
Chiodi, Luciane
Nassar, André Meloni
author_facet Nassar, André Meloni
Cabral da Costa, Cinthia
Chiodi, Luciane
author_sort Nassar, André Meloni
collection Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace)
description This study has shown that the proposed caps, with the exception of cotton, can constrain price suppression in situations of very low world prices. However, caps will not be effective if prices are at more normal levels. Brazil’s market access gains in developed countries are most likely to be constrained by the continuation of the SSG and the extent to which disciplines will achieve effective TRQ expansion. The continuation of the SSG will be an escape clause for countries seeking to maintain protection for specific sectors. The SSG will thus provide an additional layer of protection over and above the TRQ system, which itself is already a protectionist measure. Taking as an example the cases of beef, chicken and sugar in the EU, the compensation to be provided for selecting these products as sensitive will not be enough to create new trade. TRQ expansion will, at most, internalize over-quota trade: because there will not be any meaningful results in terms of import price reduction, imports will not increase. A reduction in over-quota tariffs would be the most effective way to create new trade. In the case of developing countries, the SSM is the central concern. There is a potential risk of increasing levels of protection beyond the tariff levels that were bound in the Uruguay Round leading to deterioration in current market access opportunities. Two topics now appear as “deal-breakers” for Brazil: the creation of new tariff rate quotas that will not be effective in creating new market access opportunities and an SSM that will lead to an increase in the level of protection consolidated before the Doha Round
format Informe técnico
id CGSpace161660
institution CGIAR Consortium
language Inglés
publishDate 2008
publishDateRange 2008
publishDateSort 2008
publisher International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development
publisherStr International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development
record_format dspace
spelling CGSpace1616602025-11-06T06:10:26Z Implications for Brazil of the July 2008 draft agricultural modalities Nassar, André Meloni Cabral da Costa, Cinthia Chiodi, Luciane trade prices tariffs subsidies This study has shown that the proposed caps, with the exception of cotton, can constrain price suppression in situations of very low world prices. However, caps will not be effective if prices are at more normal levels. Brazil’s market access gains in developed countries are most likely to be constrained by the continuation of the SSG and the extent to which disciplines will achieve effective TRQ expansion. The continuation of the SSG will be an escape clause for countries seeking to maintain protection for specific sectors. The SSG will thus provide an additional layer of protection over and above the TRQ system, which itself is already a protectionist measure. Taking as an example the cases of beef, chicken and sugar in the EU, the compensation to be provided for selecting these products as sensitive will not be enough to create new trade. TRQ expansion will, at most, internalize over-quota trade: because there will not be any meaningful results in terms of import price reduction, imports will not increase. A reduction in over-quota tariffs would be the most effective way to create new trade. In the case of developing countries, the SSM is the central concern. There is a potential risk of increasing levels of protection beyond the tariff levels that were bound in the Uruguay Round leading to deterioration in current market access opportunities. Two topics now appear as “deal-breakers” for Brazil: the creation of new tariff rate quotas that will not be effective in creating new market access opportunities and an SSM that will lead to an increase in the level of protection consolidated before the Doha Round 2008 2024-11-21T09:57:07Z 2024-11-21T09:57:07Z Report https://hdl.handle.net/10568/161660 en Open Access application/pdf International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development International Food Policy Research Institute Nassar, André Meloni; Cabral da Costa, Cinthia; Chiodi, Luciane. 2008. Implications for Brazil of the July 2008 draft agricultural modalities. https://hdl.handle.net/10568/161660
spellingShingle trade
prices
tariffs
subsidies
Nassar, André Meloni
Cabral da Costa, Cinthia
Chiodi, Luciane
Implications for Brazil of the July 2008 draft agricultural modalities
title Implications for Brazil of the July 2008 draft agricultural modalities
title_full Implications for Brazil of the July 2008 draft agricultural modalities
title_fullStr Implications for Brazil of the July 2008 draft agricultural modalities
title_full_unstemmed Implications for Brazil of the July 2008 draft agricultural modalities
title_short Implications for Brazil of the July 2008 draft agricultural modalities
title_sort implications for brazil of the july 2008 draft agricultural modalities
topic trade
prices
tariffs
subsidies
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/161660
work_keys_str_mv AT nassarandremeloni implicationsforbrazilofthejuly2008draftagriculturalmodalities
AT cabraldacostacinthia implicationsforbrazilofthejuly2008draftagriculturalmodalities
AT chiodiluciane implicationsforbrazilofthejuly2008draftagriculturalmodalities