How reliable are group informant ratings?: a test of food security rating in Honduras

The reliability of food security rating, a variant of the more familiar wealth ranking procedure, was tested in a rural area of Western Honduras. Twenty workshop sessions were conducted in 13 different communities, with members of organized small farmers' groups attended by a large agricultural deve...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bergeron, Gilles, Morris, Saul Sutkover, Banegas, Juan Manuel Medina
Formato: Artículo preliminar
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: International Food Policy Research Institute 1998
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/161412
_version_ 1855513579183144960
author Bergeron, Gilles
Morris, Saul Sutkover
Banegas, Juan Manuel Medina
author_browse Banegas, Juan Manuel Medina
Bergeron, Gilles
Morris, Saul Sutkover
author_facet Bergeron, Gilles
Morris, Saul Sutkover
Banegas, Juan Manuel Medina
author_sort Bergeron, Gilles
collection Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace)
description The reliability of food security rating, a variant of the more familiar wealth ranking procedure, was tested in a rural area of Western Honduras. Twenty workshop sessions were conducted in 13 different communities, with members of organized small farmers' groups attended by a large agricultural development project. Participants were all poor farmers with no more than 10 hectares of land. Participants, who generally knew each other well, were split into small sets and each set was asked to rate the food security status of all households in their organized group. Inter-rater agreement was assessed using the Kappa statistic, and related to other characteristics of the informants and workshop sessions, using multiple regression methods. Agreement was very poor (median value 6 = 0.29), especially for the category Intermittenly Food Insecure, and was associated with time elapsed since training of the session moderators. Women were 49 percent more likely than men to classify a given family as food insecure (P <0.001). The authors putforward seven different hypotheses to explain the poor reliability of the rating method, which should be investigated in future research if the credibility of the method is to be reinforced."
format Artículo preliminar
id CGSpace161412
institution CGIAR Consortium
language Inglés
publishDate 1998
publishDateRange 1998
publishDateSort 1998
publisher International Food Policy Research Institute
publisherStr International Food Policy Research Institute
record_format dspace
spelling CGSpace1614122025-11-06T05:03:40Z How reliable are group informant ratings?: a test of food security rating in Honduras Bergeron, Gilles Morris, Saul Sutkover Banegas, Juan Manuel Medina statistics food security households smallholders The reliability of food security rating, a variant of the more familiar wealth ranking procedure, was tested in a rural area of Western Honduras. Twenty workshop sessions were conducted in 13 different communities, with members of organized small farmers' groups attended by a large agricultural development project. Participants were all poor farmers with no more than 10 hectares of land. Participants, who generally knew each other well, were split into small sets and each set was asked to rate the food security status of all households in their organized group. Inter-rater agreement was assessed using the Kappa statistic, and related to other characteristics of the informants and workshop sessions, using multiple regression methods. Agreement was very poor (median value 6 = 0.29), especially for the category Intermittenly Food Insecure, and was associated with time elapsed since training of the session moderators. Women were 49 percent more likely than men to classify a given family as food insecure (P <0.001). The authors putforward seven different hypotheses to explain the poor reliability of the rating method, which should be investigated in future research if the credibility of the method is to be reinforced." 1998 2024-11-21T09:55:33Z 2024-11-21T09:55:33Z Working Paper https://hdl.handle.net/10568/161412 en Open Access application/pdf International Food Policy Research Institute Bergeron, Gilles; Morris, Saul Sutkover; Banegas, Juan Manuel Medina. 1998. How reliable are group informant ratings?;a test of food security rating in Honduras. FCND Discussion Paper 43. https://hdl.handle.net/10568/161412
spellingShingle statistics
food security
households
smallholders
Bergeron, Gilles
Morris, Saul Sutkover
Banegas, Juan Manuel Medina
How reliable are group informant ratings?: a test of food security rating in Honduras
title How reliable are group informant ratings?: a test of food security rating in Honduras
title_full How reliable are group informant ratings?: a test of food security rating in Honduras
title_fullStr How reliable are group informant ratings?: a test of food security rating in Honduras
title_full_unstemmed How reliable are group informant ratings?: a test of food security rating in Honduras
title_short How reliable are group informant ratings?: a test of food security rating in Honduras
title_sort how reliable are group informant ratings a test of food security rating in honduras
topic statistics
food security
households
smallholders
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/161412
work_keys_str_mv AT bergerongilles howreliablearegroupinformantratingsatestoffoodsecurityratinginhonduras
AT morrissaulsutkover howreliablearegroupinformantratingsatestoffoodsecurityratinginhonduras
AT banegasjuanmanuelmedina howreliablearegroupinformantratingsatestoffoodsecurityratinginhonduras