Why have some Indian states performed better than others at reducing rural poverty?

Rural poverty rankings of Indian states in 1990 were very different from 1960. This unevenness in progress allows us to study the causes of poverty in a developing rural economy. We model the evolution of various poverty measures, using pooled state-level data for the period 1957-91. Differences in...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Datt, Gaurav, Ravallion, Martin
Format: Artículo preliminar
Language:Inglés
Published: International Food Policy Research Institute 1997
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/161201
_version_ 1855518264406310912
author Datt, Gaurav
Ravallion, Martin
author_browse Datt, Gaurav
Ravallion, Martin
author_facet Datt, Gaurav
Ravallion, Martin
author_sort Datt, Gaurav
collection Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace)
description Rural poverty rankings of Indian states in 1990 were very different from 1960. This unevenness in progress allows us to study the causes of poverty in a developing rural economy. We model the evolution of various poverty measures, using pooled state-level data for the period 1957-91. Differences in trend rates of poverty reduction are attributed to differing growth rates of farm yield per acre, and differing initial conditions; states starting with better infrastructure and human resources saw significantly higher long-term rates of poverty reduction. Deviations from the trend are attributed to inflation (which hurt the poor in the short term) and shocks to farm and nonfarm output.
format Artículo preliminar
id CGSpace161201
institution CGIAR Consortium
language Inglés
publishDate 1997
publishDateRange 1997
publishDateSort 1997
publisher International Food Policy Research Institute
publisherStr International Food Policy Research Institute
record_format dspace
spelling CGSpace1612012025-11-06T05:32:24Z Why have some Indian states performed better than others at reducing rural poverty? Datt, Gaurav Ravallion, Martin poverty, rura poverty alleviation Rural poverty rankings of Indian states in 1990 were very different from 1960. This unevenness in progress allows us to study the causes of poverty in a developing rural economy. We model the evolution of various poverty measures, using pooled state-level data for the period 1957-91. Differences in trend rates of poverty reduction are attributed to differing growth rates of farm yield per acre, and differing initial conditions; states starting with better infrastructure and human resources saw significantly higher long-term rates of poverty reduction. Deviations from the trend are attributed to inflation (which hurt the poor in the short term) and shocks to farm and nonfarm output. 1997 2024-11-21T09:54:07Z 2024-11-21T09:54:07Z Working Paper https://hdl.handle.net/10568/161201 en Open Access application/pdf International Food Policy Research Institute Datt, Gaurav; Ravallion, Martin. 1997. Why have some Indian states performed better than others at reducing rural poverty? FCND Discussion Paper 26. https://hdl.handle.net/10568/161201
spellingShingle poverty, rura
poverty alleviation
Datt, Gaurav
Ravallion, Martin
Why have some Indian states performed better than others at reducing rural poverty?
title Why have some Indian states performed better than others at reducing rural poverty?
title_full Why have some Indian states performed better than others at reducing rural poverty?
title_fullStr Why have some Indian states performed better than others at reducing rural poverty?
title_full_unstemmed Why have some Indian states performed better than others at reducing rural poverty?
title_short Why have some Indian states performed better than others at reducing rural poverty?
title_sort why have some indian states performed better than others at reducing rural poverty
topic poverty, rura
poverty alleviation
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/161201
work_keys_str_mv AT dattgaurav whyhavesomeindianstatesperformedbetterthanothersatreducingruralpoverty
AT ravallionmartin whyhavesomeindianstatesperformedbetterthanothersatreducingruralpoverty