Between conservationism, eco-populism and developmentalism: discourses in biodiversity policy in Thailand and Indonesia

The present paper analyzes the role of discourse in conflicts concerning nature conservation in tropical countries. We focus on the contested question as to whether and to which extent local communities should be allowed to live and use resources inside protected areas. Applying the concepts of beli...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wittmer, Heidi, Birner, Regina
Format: Artículo preliminar
Language:Inglés
Published: International Food Policy Research Institute 2005
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/160726
_version_ 1855537595538210816
author Wittmer, Heidi
Birner, Regina
author_browse Birner, Regina
Wittmer, Heidi
author_facet Wittmer, Heidi
Birner, Regina
author_sort Wittmer, Heidi
collection Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace)
description The present paper analyzes the role of discourse in conflicts concerning nature conservation in tropical countries. We focus on the contested question as to whether and to which extent local communities should be allowed to live and use resources inside protected areas. Applying the concepts of belief-systems, story-lines and discourse coalitions, we analyze two empirical case studies dealing with this conflict: The first case study is concerned with a policy process at the national level that aimed at passing a community forestry law in Thailand to make the establishment of community forests in protected areas possible. The second case study deals with the proposed resettlement of a village from the Lore Lindu National Park in Sulawesi, Indonesia. In both cases, three discourses could be observed: a conservationist discourse, an eco-populist discourse, and a developmentalist discourse. The case studies show that the conservationists and the developmentalists were able to form a discourse coalition, which was challenged by the proponents of the eco-populist discourse. The analysis also demonstrates that establishing story-lines in the discourse can lead to the neglect of facts and problems that do not fit in either discourse. The paper draws attention to the role of science in the different discourses and concludes that scientists should become more aware of the role they play in the different discourses.
format Artículo preliminar
id CGSpace160726
institution CGIAR Consortium
language Inglés
publishDate 2005
publishDateRange 2005
publishDateSort 2005
publisher International Food Policy Research Institute
publisherStr International Food Policy Research Institute
record_format dspace
spelling CGSpace1607262025-11-06T07:26:01Z Between conservationism, eco-populism and developmentalism: discourses in biodiversity policy in Thailand and Indonesia Wittmer, Heidi Birner, Regina protected areas environmental management national parks biodiversity genetic resources forests communal forests natural resources The present paper analyzes the role of discourse in conflicts concerning nature conservation in tropical countries. We focus on the contested question as to whether and to which extent local communities should be allowed to live and use resources inside protected areas. Applying the concepts of belief-systems, story-lines and discourse coalitions, we analyze two empirical case studies dealing with this conflict: The first case study is concerned with a policy process at the national level that aimed at passing a community forestry law in Thailand to make the establishment of community forests in protected areas possible. The second case study deals with the proposed resettlement of a village from the Lore Lindu National Park in Sulawesi, Indonesia. In both cases, three discourses could be observed: a conservationist discourse, an eco-populist discourse, and a developmentalist discourse. The case studies show that the conservationists and the developmentalists were able to form a discourse coalition, which was challenged by the proponents of the eco-populist discourse. The analysis also demonstrates that establishing story-lines in the discourse can lead to the neglect of facts and problems that do not fit in either discourse. The paper draws attention to the role of science in the different discourses and concludes that scientists should become more aware of the role they play in the different discourses. 2005 2024-11-21T09:51:45Z 2024-11-21T09:51:45Z Working Paper https://hdl.handle.net/10568/160726 en Open Access application/pdf International Food Policy Research Institute Wittmer, Heidi; Birner, Regina. Between conservationism, eco-populism and developmentalism: discourses in biodiversity policy in Thailand and Indonesia. CAPRi working paper. 0037. International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). https://hdl.handle.net/10568/160726
spellingShingle protected areas
environmental management
national parks
biodiversity
genetic resources
forests
communal forests
natural resources
Wittmer, Heidi
Birner, Regina
Between conservationism, eco-populism and developmentalism: discourses in biodiversity policy in Thailand and Indonesia
title Between conservationism, eco-populism and developmentalism: discourses in biodiversity policy in Thailand and Indonesia
title_full Between conservationism, eco-populism and developmentalism: discourses in biodiversity policy in Thailand and Indonesia
title_fullStr Between conservationism, eco-populism and developmentalism: discourses in biodiversity policy in Thailand and Indonesia
title_full_unstemmed Between conservationism, eco-populism and developmentalism: discourses in biodiversity policy in Thailand and Indonesia
title_short Between conservationism, eco-populism and developmentalism: discourses in biodiversity policy in Thailand and Indonesia
title_sort between conservationism eco populism and developmentalism discourses in biodiversity policy in thailand and indonesia
topic protected areas
environmental management
national parks
biodiversity
genetic resources
forests
communal forests
natural resources
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/160726
work_keys_str_mv AT wittmerheidi betweenconservationismecopopulismanddevelopmentalismdiscoursesinbiodiversitypolicyinthailandandindonesia
AT birnerregina betweenconservationismecopopulismanddevelopmentalismdiscoursesinbiodiversitypolicyinthailandandindonesia