Seeking a common path: structuring multistakeholder dialogue on agricultural biotechnology in Africa

This paper analyzes an ongoing effort by national, regional, and international partners to raise awareness, promote dialogue, and catalyze consensus-building mechanisms among stakeholder groups on the role of biotechnology in agricultural development and food security in southern Africa. Stakeholder...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: von Grebmer, Klaus, Omamo, Steven Were
Format: Artículo preliminar
Language:Inglés
Published: International Food Policy Research Institute 2006
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/160448
_version_ 1855530912681295872
author von Grebmer, Klaus
Omamo, Steven Were
author_browse Omamo, Steven Were
von Grebmer, Klaus
author_facet von Grebmer, Klaus
Omamo, Steven Were
author_sort von Grebmer, Klaus
collection Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace)
description This paper analyzes an ongoing effort by national, regional, and international partners to raise awareness, promote dialogue, and catalyze consensus-building mechanisms among stakeholder groups on the role of biotechnology in agricultural development and food security in southern Africa. Stakeholders include public bodies, the private sector, and civil society. The paper argues that while responsible adoption of agricultural biotechnology promises significant gains to the countries of southern Africa, governments must clarify its specific role, improve policies for its application, and assess the place of biotechnology in broader development strategies. The issues that surround the introduction, creation, and application of agricultural biotechnology in southern Africa are complex, and the passions behind them are strong. The best chance of building consensus lies in bringing different views to the table for deliberation and information sharing, thus starting a process of collaborative planning, implementation, and evaluation of various activities. Deepening the dialogue and involving more parties has many challenges. Strong conflicts among members are to be expected, and there is a risk of dissolution of the dialogue process as a result of these conflicts and other factors such as lack of interest and shortage of resources. If stakeholders focus on the process, these obstacles can be overcome. Building trust and commitment among the members, maintaining communication, exchanging knowledge, and being open to revision of old views will help the dialogue continue and will ultimately make it more productive.
format Artículo preliminar
id CGSpace160448
institution CGIAR Consortium
language Inglés
publishDate 2006
publishDateRange 2006
publishDateSort 2006
publisher International Food Policy Research Institute
publisherStr International Food Policy Research Institute
record_format dspace
spelling CGSpace1604482025-11-06T03:45:14Z Seeking a common path: structuring multistakeholder dialogue on agricultural biotechnology in Africa von Grebmer, Klaus Omamo, Steven Were conflict management food security genetically modified foods biotechnology capacity building This paper analyzes an ongoing effort by national, regional, and international partners to raise awareness, promote dialogue, and catalyze consensus-building mechanisms among stakeholder groups on the role of biotechnology in agricultural development and food security in southern Africa. Stakeholders include public bodies, the private sector, and civil society. The paper argues that while responsible adoption of agricultural biotechnology promises significant gains to the countries of southern Africa, governments must clarify its specific role, improve policies for its application, and assess the place of biotechnology in broader development strategies. The issues that surround the introduction, creation, and application of agricultural biotechnology in southern Africa are complex, and the passions behind them are strong. The best chance of building consensus lies in bringing different views to the table for deliberation and information sharing, thus starting a process of collaborative planning, implementation, and evaluation of various activities. Deepening the dialogue and involving more parties has many challenges. Strong conflicts among members are to be expected, and there is a risk of dissolution of the dialogue process as a result of these conflicts and other factors such as lack of interest and shortage of resources. If stakeholders focus on the process, these obstacles can be overcome. Building trust and commitment among the members, maintaining communication, exchanging knowledge, and being open to revision of old views will help the dialogue continue and will ultimately make it more productive. 2006 2024-11-21T09:50:49Z 2024-11-21T09:50:49Z Working Paper https://hdl.handle.net/10568/160448 en Open Access application/pdf International Food Policy Research Institute von Grebmer, Klaus; Omamo, Steven Were. Seeking a common path: structuring multistakeholder dialogue on agricultural biotechnology in Africa. ISNAR Discussion Paper 4. International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). https://doi.org/10.2499/2020ISNARDP04.
spellingShingle conflict management
food security
genetically modified foods
biotechnology
capacity building
von Grebmer, Klaus
Omamo, Steven Were
Seeking a common path: structuring multistakeholder dialogue on agricultural biotechnology in Africa
title Seeking a common path: structuring multistakeholder dialogue on agricultural biotechnology in Africa
title_full Seeking a common path: structuring multistakeholder dialogue on agricultural biotechnology in Africa
title_fullStr Seeking a common path: structuring multistakeholder dialogue on agricultural biotechnology in Africa
title_full_unstemmed Seeking a common path: structuring multistakeholder dialogue on agricultural biotechnology in Africa
title_short Seeking a common path: structuring multistakeholder dialogue on agricultural biotechnology in Africa
title_sort seeking a common path structuring multistakeholder dialogue on agricultural biotechnology in africa
topic conflict management
food security
genetically modified foods
biotechnology
capacity building
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/160448
work_keys_str_mv AT vongrebmerklaus seekingacommonpathstructuringmultistakeholderdialogueonagriculturalbiotechnologyinafrica
AT omamostevenwere seekingacommonpathstructuringmultistakeholderdialogueonagriculturalbiotechnologyinafrica