Is there persistence in the impact of emergency food aid?: evidence on consumption, food security, and assets in rural Ethiopia
The primary goal of emergency food aid after an economic shock is often to bolster short-term food and nutrition security. However, these transfers also act as insurance against other shock effects, such as destruction of assets and changes in economic activity, which can have lasting deleterious co...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Artículo preliminar |
| Language: | Inglés |
| Published: |
International Food Policy Research Institute
2006
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/160408 |
Similar Items: Is there persistence in the impact of emergency food aid?: evidence on consumption, food security, and assets in rural Ethiopia
- Is there persistence in the impact of emergency food aid?: Evidence on consumption, food security, and assets in rural Ethiopia
- Do differences in the scale of irrigation projects generate different impacts on poverty and production?
- Impacts of fuel efficient improved cooking stove on biomass collection and consumption in rural Ethiopia
- Assessing the livelihood impacts of a livestock disease outbreak: An alternative approach
- Impact of agricultural credit on productivity, cost and returns from cocoa production in Ghana
- The role of climate smart agricultural practices on household income and food security: A propensity score matching approach