Risk assessment and management of genetically modified organisms under Australia's Gene Technology Act
Compared to both Canada and the United States, Australia has been slow to approve commercial planting of transgenic crops. Two probable reasons exist for the slow approval rate of transgenic crops in Australia. The first reason is community perceptions about the risks associated with transgenic tech...
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Artículo preliminar |
| Language: | Inglés |
| Published: |
International Food Policy Research Institute
2006
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/160398 |
| _version_ | 1855518536592523264 |
|---|---|
| author | Linacre, Nicholas A. Falck-Zepeda, José B. Komen, John MacLaren, Donald |
| author_browse | Falck-Zepeda, José B. Komen, John Linacre, Nicholas A. MacLaren, Donald |
| author_facet | Linacre, Nicholas A. Falck-Zepeda, José B. Komen, John MacLaren, Donald |
| author_sort | Linacre, Nicholas A. |
| collection | Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace) |
| description | Compared to both Canada and the United States, Australia has been slow to approve commercial planting of transgenic crops. Two probable reasons exist for the slow approval rate of transgenic crops in Australia. The first reason is community perceptions about the risks associated with transgenic technologies. The second is the regulatory framework currently employed to approve commercial releases. This paper examines some of the potential regulatory issues that may be affecting the review process and approval of transgenic technologies. First we provide a brief introduction to the regulatory structure in Australia, second we consider the impact of regional, national and state jurisdictions, third we argue that the regulator needs to consider the use of benefits analysis in decision making, fourth we argue for the use of probabilistic risk assessments in certain circumstances, and fifth we look at potential problems inherent in majority voting in a committee and recommend alternatives.--Authors' Abstract |
| format | Artículo preliminar |
| id | CGSpace160398 |
| institution | CGIAR Consortium |
| language | Inglés |
| publishDate | 2006 |
| publishDateRange | 2006 |
| publishDateSort | 2006 |
| publisher | International Food Policy Research Institute |
| publisherStr | International Food Policy Research Institute |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | CGSpace1603982025-11-06T03:43:48Z Risk assessment and management of genetically modified organisms under Australia's Gene Technology Act Linacre, Nicholas A. Falck-Zepeda, José B. Komen, John MacLaren, Donald risk assessment biotechnology environmental impact genetically modified organisms Compared to both Canada and the United States, Australia has been slow to approve commercial planting of transgenic crops. Two probable reasons exist for the slow approval rate of transgenic crops in Australia. The first reason is community perceptions about the risks associated with transgenic technologies. The second is the regulatory framework currently employed to approve commercial releases. This paper examines some of the potential regulatory issues that may be affecting the review process and approval of transgenic technologies. First we provide a brief introduction to the regulatory structure in Australia, second we consider the impact of regional, national and state jurisdictions, third we argue that the regulator needs to consider the use of benefits analysis in decision making, fourth we argue for the use of probabilistic risk assessments in certain circumstances, and fifth we look at potential problems inherent in majority voting in a committee and recommend alternatives.--Authors' Abstract 2006 2024-11-21T09:50:41Z 2024-11-21T09:50:41Z Working Paper https://hdl.handle.net/10568/160398 en Open Access application/pdf International Food Policy Research Institute Linacre, Nicholas A.; Falck-Zepeda, José Benjamin; Komen, John; MacLaren, Donald. Risk assessment and management of genetically modified organisms under Australia's Gene Technology Act. EPTD Discussion Paper 157. International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). https://hdl.handle.net/10568/160398 |
| spellingShingle | risk assessment biotechnology environmental impact genetically modified organisms Linacre, Nicholas A. Falck-Zepeda, José B. Komen, John MacLaren, Donald Risk assessment and management of genetically modified organisms under Australia's Gene Technology Act |
| title | Risk assessment and management of genetically modified organisms under Australia's Gene Technology Act |
| title_full | Risk assessment and management of genetically modified organisms under Australia's Gene Technology Act |
| title_fullStr | Risk assessment and management of genetically modified organisms under Australia's Gene Technology Act |
| title_full_unstemmed | Risk assessment and management of genetically modified organisms under Australia's Gene Technology Act |
| title_short | Risk assessment and management of genetically modified organisms under Australia's Gene Technology Act |
| title_sort | risk assessment and management of genetically modified organisms under australia s gene technology act |
| topic | risk assessment biotechnology environmental impact genetically modified organisms |
| url | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/160398 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT linacrenicholasa riskassessmentandmanagementofgeneticallymodifiedorganismsunderaustraliasgenetechnologyact AT falckzepedajoseb riskassessmentandmanagementofgeneticallymodifiedorganismsunderaustraliasgenetechnologyact AT komenjohn riskassessmentandmanagementofgeneticallymodifiedorganismsunderaustraliasgenetechnologyact AT maclarendonald riskassessmentandmanagementofgeneticallymodifiedorganismsunderaustraliasgenetechnologyact |