Alternate wetting and drying: a water‑saving technology for sustainable rice production in Burkina Faso?

With emerging water scarcity and rising fertilizer prices, optimising future water use while maintaining yield and nutrient efficiency in irrigated rice is crucial. Alternate wetting and moderate soil drying irrigation (i.e., re-irrigation when the water level reaches 15 cm below the soil surface) h...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Johnson, J.M., Becker, M., Kabore, J.E., Dossou-Yovo, Elliott Ronald, Saito, Kazuki
Format: Journal Article
Language:Inglés
Published: 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/160010
_version_ 1855532383404556288
author Johnson, J.M.
Becker, M.
Kabore, J.E.
Dossou-Yovo, Elliott Ronald
Saito, Kazuki
author_browse Becker, M.
Dossou-Yovo, Elliott Ronald
Johnson, J.M.
Kabore, J.E.
Saito, Kazuki
author_facet Johnson, J.M.
Becker, M.
Kabore, J.E.
Dossou-Yovo, Elliott Ronald
Saito, Kazuki
author_sort Johnson, J.M.
collection Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace)
description With emerging water scarcity and rising fertilizer prices, optimising future water use while maintaining yield and nutrient efficiency in irrigated rice is crucial. Alternate wetting and moderate soil drying irrigation (i.e., re-irrigation when the water level reaches 15 cm below the soil surface) has proven to be an efficient water-saving technology in semi-arid zones of West Africa, reducing water inputs without yield penalty. Alternate wetting and severe soil drying (AWD30), by re-irrigating fields only when the water table reaches 30 cm below the soil surface, may further reduce water inputs compared to farmers’ irrigation practices (FP). However, acute soil drying may impair fertilizer use efficiency and reduce the bio-availability of some key nutrients. This study assessed the potentials and risks associated with AWD30 for smallholder rice farmers in the semi-arid zones of West Africa. We conducted 30 on-farm field trials over three seasons (wet and dry seasons of 2019, and dry season of 2020), in Kou Valley, Burkina Faso. We assessed yield, water productivity, nutrient uptake, and use efficiency under AWD30 and FP. In FP, farmers maintained their fields submerged as frequently as possible according to the scheme-dependent water provision schedule. With AWD30, irrigation frequency was reduced by 30%, however, soils were seldom completely dried due to a shallow groundwater table. Compared to FP, AWD30 reduced irrigation water input by 37% with no significant effects on grain yields (average of 4.5 Mg ha−1), thus increasing average water productivity by 39%. Both irrigation management practices provided comparable crop uptake of N, P, and K, and use efficiencies of applied N and P. However, the N content in straw and the P concentration in grain generally increased with total water input (rain + irrigation). We conclude that at locations with a shallow groundwater table, AWD30 can effectively save irrigation water without significantly reducing the grain yield and the use efficiency of applied mineral nutrients.
format Journal Article
id CGSpace160010
institution CGIAR Consortium
language Inglés
publishDate 2024
publishDateRange 2024
publishDateSort 2024
record_format dspace
spelling CGSpace1600102025-11-12T04:58:33Z Alternate wetting and drying: a water‑saving technology for sustainable rice production in Burkina Faso? Johnson, J.M. Becker, M. Kabore, J.E. Dossou-Yovo, Elliott Ronald Saito, Kazuki rice sustainability agricultural production With emerging water scarcity and rising fertilizer prices, optimising future water use while maintaining yield and nutrient efficiency in irrigated rice is crucial. Alternate wetting and moderate soil drying irrigation (i.e., re-irrigation when the water level reaches 15 cm below the soil surface) has proven to be an efficient water-saving technology in semi-arid zones of West Africa, reducing water inputs without yield penalty. Alternate wetting and severe soil drying (AWD30), by re-irrigating fields only when the water table reaches 30 cm below the soil surface, may further reduce water inputs compared to farmers’ irrigation practices (FP). However, acute soil drying may impair fertilizer use efficiency and reduce the bio-availability of some key nutrients. This study assessed the potentials and risks associated with AWD30 for smallholder rice farmers in the semi-arid zones of West Africa. We conducted 30 on-farm field trials over three seasons (wet and dry seasons of 2019, and dry season of 2020), in Kou Valley, Burkina Faso. We assessed yield, water productivity, nutrient uptake, and use efficiency under AWD30 and FP. In FP, farmers maintained their fields submerged as frequently as possible according to the scheme-dependent water provision schedule. With AWD30, irrigation frequency was reduced by 30%, however, soils were seldom completely dried due to a shallow groundwater table. Compared to FP, AWD30 reduced irrigation water input by 37% with no significant effects on grain yields (average of 4.5 Mg ha−1), thus increasing average water productivity by 39%. Both irrigation management practices provided comparable crop uptake of N, P, and K, and use efficiencies of applied N and P. However, the N content in straw and the P concentration in grain generally increased with total water input (rain + irrigation). We conclude that at locations with a shallow groundwater table, AWD30 can effectively save irrigation water without significantly reducing the grain yield and the use efficiency of applied mineral nutrients. 2024-08 2024-11-20T18:19:57Z 2024-11-20T18:19:57Z Journal Article https://hdl.handle.net/10568/160010 en Open Access application/pdf Johnson, J.M., Becker, M., Dossou-Yovo, E.R., Saito, K. and Kabore, J.E. 2024. Alternate wetting and drying: a water‑saving technology for sustainable rice production in Burkina Faso? Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 129(1):93-111.
spellingShingle rice
sustainability
agricultural production
Johnson, J.M.
Becker, M.
Kabore, J.E.
Dossou-Yovo, Elliott Ronald
Saito, Kazuki
Alternate wetting and drying: a water‑saving technology for sustainable rice production in Burkina Faso?
title Alternate wetting and drying: a water‑saving technology for sustainable rice production in Burkina Faso?
title_full Alternate wetting and drying: a water‑saving technology for sustainable rice production in Burkina Faso?
title_fullStr Alternate wetting and drying: a water‑saving technology for sustainable rice production in Burkina Faso?
title_full_unstemmed Alternate wetting and drying: a water‑saving technology for sustainable rice production in Burkina Faso?
title_short Alternate wetting and drying: a water‑saving technology for sustainable rice production in Burkina Faso?
title_sort alternate wetting and drying a water saving technology for sustainable rice production in burkina faso
topic rice
sustainability
agricultural production
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/160010
work_keys_str_mv AT johnsonjm alternatewettinganddryingawatersavingtechnologyforsustainablericeproductioninburkinafaso
AT beckerm alternatewettinganddryingawatersavingtechnologyforsustainablericeproductioninburkinafaso
AT kaboreje alternatewettinganddryingawatersavingtechnologyforsustainablericeproductioninburkinafaso
AT dossouyovoelliottronald alternatewettinganddryingawatersavingtechnologyforsustainablericeproductioninburkinafaso
AT saitokazuki alternatewettinganddryingawatersavingtechnologyforsustainablericeproductioninburkinafaso