Assessing Africa’s environmental footprint: Unveiling cattle production variation across regions
The livestock industry in Africa has experienced significant expansion due to increased demand for meat, dairy, and associated products. Nevertheless, while striving to meet the increasing demand for meat and milk, African livestock production systems generate significant environmental impacts mainl...
| Autores principales: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Ponencia |
| Lenguaje: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
2024
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/159494 |
| _version_ | 1855517488037494784 |
|---|---|
| author | Isiaho, Glarion Mwema, Emmanuel Van Der Hoek, Rein Notenbaert, An Gonzalez Quintero, Ricardo |
| author_browse | Gonzalez Quintero, Ricardo Isiaho, Glarion Mwema, Emmanuel Notenbaert, An Van Der Hoek, Rein |
| author_facet | Isiaho, Glarion Mwema, Emmanuel Van Der Hoek, Rein Notenbaert, An Gonzalez Quintero, Ricardo |
| author_sort | Isiaho, Glarion |
| collection | Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace) |
| description | The livestock industry in Africa has experienced significant expansion due to increased demand for meat, dairy, and associated products. Nevertheless, while striving to meet the increasing demand for meat and milk, African livestock production systems generate significant environmental impacts mainly due to their relatively low productivity. Several research initiatives have assessed the greenhouse gas (GHG) emission intensities, soil impacts, water consumption, and land usage of various livestock systems across multiple regions in Africa. Despite advancements, there are still gaps in the understanding of regional variation of GHG emissions, water footprint, land footprint, and their implications for livestock production systems in Africa, particularly when assessed in terms of intensity per unit product. These gaps are evident in the notable lack of comprehensive studies that consolidate all environmental footprints from the African cattle production sector. This study seeks to review the existing evidence of cattle production characteristics in various environmental domains, including GHG emissions, water usage, land use, soil degradation, and nitrogen balance. Input data collected from existing literature spanning from 2003 to 2023 divides Africa into five regions: Northern, Eastern, Western, Central, and Southern Africa. The analysis categorises the production systems of cattle into three types: intensive, semi-intensive, and extensive systems. Six bibliographic databases namely Science Direct, PubMed, Web of Science, Dimensions Research Scholar, Semantic, and Research Gate were accessed. 112 publications were selected from a pool of 158 papers retrieved, after screening titles and abstracts. The findings indicate that cattle systems in Africa exhibit a notably higher environmental impact from meat and milk production compared to both global and continental levels. This exerts significant pressure on environmental resources, potentially leading to long-term risks. Significantly, Southern Africa demonstrates superior performance compared to other regions on the continent. However, persistent challenges such as low feed quality and availability, lack of specialisation, and reliance on low-productive breeds remain. Implementing locally tailored measures is essential to address these issues. |
| format | Ponencia |
| id | CGSpace159494 |
| institution | CGIAR Consortium |
| language | Inglés |
| publishDate | 2024 |
| publishDateRange | 2024 |
| publishDateSort | 2024 |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | CGSpace1594942025-11-05T11:04:27Z Assessing Africa’s environmental footprint: Unveiling cattle production variation across regions Isiaho, Glarion Mwema, Emmanuel Van Der Hoek, Rein Notenbaert, An Gonzalez Quintero, Ricardo greenhouse gas emissions ganadería gases de efecto invernadero productivity water land agua tierra cattle productividad The livestock industry in Africa has experienced significant expansion due to increased demand for meat, dairy, and associated products. Nevertheless, while striving to meet the increasing demand for meat and milk, African livestock production systems generate significant environmental impacts mainly due to their relatively low productivity. Several research initiatives have assessed the greenhouse gas (GHG) emission intensities, soil impacts, water consumption, and land usage of various livestock systems across multiple regions in Africa. Despite advancements, there are still gaps in the understanding of regional variation of GHG emissions, water footprint, land footprint, and their implications for livestock production systems in Africa, particularly when assessed in terms of intensity per unit product. These gaps are evident in the notable lack of comprehensive studies that consolidate all environmental footprints from the African cattle production sector. This study seeks to review the existing evidence of cattle production characteristics in various environmental domains, including GHG emissions, water usage, land use, soil degradation, and nitrogen balance. Input data collected from existing literature spanning from 2003 to 2023 divides Africa into five regions: Northern, Eastern, Western, Central, and Southern Africa. The analysis categorises the production systems of cattle into three types: intensive, semi-intensive, and extensive systems. Six bibliographic databases namely Science Direct, PubMed, Web of Science, Dimensions Research Scholar, Semantic, and Research Gate were accessed. 112 publications were selected from a pool of 158 papers retrieved, after screening titles and abstracts. The findings indicate that cattle systems in Africa exhibit a notably higher environmental impact from meat and milk production compared to both global and continental levels. This exerts significant pressure on environmental resources, potentially leading to long-term risks. Significantly, Southern Africa demonstrates superior performance compared to other regions on the continent. However, persistent challenges such as low feed quality and availability, lack of specialisation, and reliance on low-productive breeds remain. Implementing locally tailored measures is essential to address these issues. 2024-09-11 2024-11-11T11:22:35Z 2024-11-11T11:22:35Z Presentation https://hdl.handle.net/10568/159494 en Open Access application/pdf Isiaho, G.; Mwema, E.; Van Der Hoek, R.; Notenbaert, A.; Gonzalez Quintero, R. (2024) Assessing Africa’s environmental footprint: Unveiling cattle production variation across regions. Presented at Tropentag: Explore opportunities... for managing natural resources and a better life for all, on 11-13 September 2024 in Vienna (Austria). 9 sl. |
| spellingShingle | greenhouse gas emissions ganadería gases de efecto invernadero productivity water land agua tierra cattle productividad Isiaho, Glarion Mwema, Emmanuel Van Der Hoek, Rein Notenbaert, An Gonzalez Quintero, Ricardo Assessing Africa’s environmental footprint: Unveiling cattle production variation across regions |
| title | Assessing Africa’s environmental footprint: Unveiling cattle production variation across regions |
| title_full | Assessing Africa’s environmental footprint: Unveiling cattle production variation across regions |
| title_fullStr | Assessing Africa’s environmental footprint: Unveiling cattle production variation across regions |
| title_full_unstemmed | Assessing Africa’s environmental footprint: Unveiling cattle production variation across regions |
| title_short | Assessing Africa’s environmental footprint: Unveiling cattle production variation across regions |
| title_sort | assessing africa s environmental footprint unveiling cattle production variation across regions |
| topic | greenhouse gas emissions ganadería gases de efecto invernadero productivity water land agua tierra cattle productividad |
| url | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/159494 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT isiahoglarion assessingafricasenvironmentalfootprintunveilingcattleproductionvariationacrossregions AT mwemaemmanuel assessingafricasenvironmentalfootprintunveilingcattleproductionvariationacrossregions AT vanderhoekrein assessingafricasenvironmentalfootprintunveilingcattleproductionvariationacrossregions AT notenbaertan assessingafricasenvironmentalfootprintunveilingcattleproductionvariationacrossregions AT gonzalezquinteroricardo assessingafricasenvironmentalfootprintunveilingcattleproductionvariationacrossregions |