Accurate measurement of field size is essential for analysis of smallholder survey data

Context Agronomic surveys play a vital role in identifying on-farm yield constraints and opportunities to increase productivity, input-use efficiency, and farmer profit. These surveys typically rely on farmer-reported data, where crop yield and applied inputs per hectare are estimated based on farme...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Flor, Rica Joy, Yuan, Shen, Rizzo, Gonzalo, Agus, Fahmuddin, Pame, Anny Ruth P., Ouk, Akhara, Then, Rathmuny, Keo, Sokheng, Kumar, Virender, Grassini, Patricio
Formato: Journal Article
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: Elsevier 2024
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/158405
_version_ 1855540617345499136
author Flor, Rica Joy
Yuan, Shen
Rizzo, Gonzalo
Agus, Fahmuddin
Pame, Anny Ruth P.
Ouk, Akhara
Then, Rathmuny
Keo, Sokheng
Kumar, Virender
Grassini, Patricio
author_browse Agus, Fahmuddin
Flor, Rica Joy
Grassini, Patricio
Keo, Sokheng
Kumar, Virender
Ouk, Akhara
Pame, Anny Ruth P.
Rizzo, Gonzalo
Then, Rathmuny
Yuan, Shen
author_facet Flor, Rica Joy
Yuan, Shen
Rizzo, Gonzalo
Agus, Fahmuddin
Pame, Anny Ruth P.
Ouk, Akhara
Then, Rathmuny
Keo, Sokheng
Kumar, Virender
Grassini, Patricio
author_sort Flor, Rica Joy
collection Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace)
description Context Agronomic surveys play a vital role in identifying on-farm yield constraints and opportunities to increase productivity, input-use efficiency, and farmer profit. These surveys typically rely on farmer-reported data, where crop yield and applied inputs per hectare are estimated based on farmer-reported total harvested output and applied inputs per field and associated field size. At question is how accurate field size is, which is vital in the case of smallholders as small inaccuracies can lead to large biases in estimated yield and inputs. Objectives The goals of this study are to assess current approaches to determine field size in smallholders, analyze biases between measurements and farmer estimates, and their influence on the analysis of the survey data. Cost-effective approaches for accurate field size measurement are also discussed. Methods We reviewed published studies that used survey data collected from smallholders to determine the extent to which field size is independently validated by researchers. Subsequently, we used data from thousands of smallholder fields in Southeast Asia to compare farmer-reported versus measured field size and examined the associated impact on estimated yields, inputs, and their relationships. Results We found that most published studies using survey data did not validate field size reported by farmers. Furthermore, our analysis of the field size data from smallholders in Southeast Asia showed substantial differences between farmer-reported and measured field size, resulting in significant biases in estimated yield and applied inputs, and leading to spurious relationships between them. Conclusion Uncertainty in field size can mislead analysis of smallholder survey data. Implications Future studies relying on survey data from smallholders should incorporate measurements of field size for accurate determination of crop yield and inputs.
format Journal Article
id CGSpace158405
institution CGIAR Consortium
language Inglés
publishDate 2024
publishDateRange 2024
publishDateSort 2024
publisher Elsevier
publisherStr Elsevier
record_format dspace
spelling CGSpace1584052025-12-08T10:11:39Z Accurate measurement of field size is essential for analysis of smallholder survey data Flor, Rica Joy Yuan, Shen Rizzo, Gonzalo Agus, Fahmuddin Pame, Anny Ruth P. Ouk, Akhara Then, Rathmuny Keo, Sokheng Kumar, Virender Grassini, Patricio field size smallholders yields inputs surveys impact assessment Context Agronomic surveys play a vital role in identifying on-farm yield constraints and opportunities to increase productivity, input-use efficiency, and farmer profit. These surveys typically rely on farmer-reported data, where crop yield and applied inputs per hectare are estimated based on farmer-reported total harvested output and applied inputs per field and associated field size. At question is how accurate field size is, which is vital in the case of smallholders as small inaccuracies can lead to large biases in estimated yield and inputs. Objectives The goals of this study are to assess current approaches to determine field size in smallholders, analyze biases between measurements and farmer estimates, and their influence on the analysis of the survey data. Cost-effective approaches for accurate field size measurement are also discussed. Methods We reviewed published studies that used survey data collected from smallholders to determine the extent to which field size is independently validated by researchers. Subsequently, we used data from thousands of smallholder fields in Southeast Asia to compare farmer-reported versus measured field size and examined the associated impact on estimated yields, inputs, and their relationships. Results We found that most published studies using survey data did not validate field size reported by farmers. Furthermore, our analysis of the field size data from smallholders in Southeast Asia showed substantial differences between farmer-reported and measured field size, resulting in significant biases in estimated yield and applied inputs, and leading to spurious relationships between them. Conclusion Uncertainty in field size can mislead analysis of smallholder survey data. Implications Future studies relying on survey data from smallholders should incorporate measurements of field size for accurate determination of crop yield and inputs. 2024-05 2024-11-01T14:46:21Z 2024-11-01T14:46:21Z Journal Article https://hdl.handle.net/10568/158405 en Open Access application/pdf Elsevier Flor, Rica Joy, Shen Yuan, Gonzalo Rizzo, Fahmuddin Agus, Anny Ruth P. Pame, Akhara Ouk, Rathmuny Then, Sokheng Keo, Virender Kumar, and Patricio Grassini. "Accurate measurement of field size is essential for analysis of smallholder survey data." Field Crops Research 311 (2024): 109383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2024.109383
spellingShingle field size
smallholders
yields
inputs
surveys
impact assessment
Flor, Rica Joy
Yuan, Shen
Rizzo, Gonzalo
Agus, Fahmuddin
Pame, Anny Ruth P.
Ouk, Akhara
Then, Rathmuny
Keo, Sokheng
Kumar, Virender
Grassini, Patricio
Accurate measurement of field size is essential for analysis of smallholder survey data
title Accurate measurement of field size is essential for analysis of smallholder survey data
title_full Accurate measurement of field size is essential for analysis of smallholder survey data
title_fullStr Accurate measurement of field size is essential for analysis of smallholder survey data
title_full_unstemmed Accurate measurement of field size is essential for analysis of smallholder survey data
title_short Accurate measurement of field size is essential for analysis of smallholder survey data
title_sort accurate measurement of field size is essential for analysis of smallholder survey data
topic field size
smallholders
yields
inputs
surveys
impact assessment
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/158405
work_keys_str_mv AT florricajoy accuratemeasurementoffieldsizeisessentialforanalysisofsmallholdersurveydata
AT yuanshen accuratemeasurementoffieldsizeisessentialforanalysisofsmallholdersurveydata
AT rizzogonzalo accuratemeasurementoffieldsizeisessentialforanalysisofsmallholdersurveydata
AT agusfahmuddin accuratemeasurementoffieldsizeisessentialforanalysisofsmallholdersurveydata
AT pameannyruthp accuratemeasurementoffieldsizeisessentialforanalysisofsmallholdersurveydata
AT oukakhara accuratemeasurementoffieldsizeisessentialforanalysisofsmallholdersurveydata
AT thenrathmuny accuratemeasurementoffieldsizeisessentialforanalysisofsmallholdersurveydata
AT keosokheng accuratemeasurementoffieldsizeisessentialforanalysisofsmallholdersurveydata
AT kumarvirender accuratemeasurementoffieldsizeisessentialforanalysisofsmallholdersurveydata
AT grassinipatricio accuratemeasurementoffieldsizeisessentialforanalysisofsmallholdersurveydata