Identifying conservation priority areas of hydrological ecosystem service using hot and cold spot analysis at watershed scale

Hydrological Ecosystem Services (HES) are crucial components of environmental sustainability and provide indispensable benefits. The present study identifies critical hot and cold spots areas of HES in the Aglar watershed of the Indian Himalayan Region using six HES descriptors, namely water yield (...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gwal, S., Sena, Dipaka Ranjan, Srivastava, P. K., Srivastava, S. K.
Formato: Journal Article
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: MDPI 2024
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/158328
_version_ 1855518731401166848
author Gwal, S.
Sena, Dipaka Ranjan
Srivastava, P. K.
Srivastava, S. K.
author_browse Gwal, S.
Sena, Dipaka Ranjan
Srivastava, P. K.
Srivastava, S. K.
author_facet Gwal, S.
Sena, Dipaka Ranjan
Srivastava, P. K.
Srivastava, S. K.
author_sort Gwal, S.
collection Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace)
description Hydrological Ecosystem Services (HES) are crucial components of environmental sustainability and provide indispensable benefits. The present study identifies critical hot and cold spots areas of HES in the Aglar watershed of the Indian Himalayan Region using six HES descriptors, namely water yield (WYLD), crop yield factor (CYF), sediment yield (SYLD), base flow (LATQ), surface runoff (SURFQ), and total water retention (TWR). The analysis was conducted using weightage-based approaches under two methods: (1) evaluating six HES descriptors individually and (2) grouping them into broad ecosystem service categories. Furthermore, the study assessed pixel-level uncertainties that arose because of the distinctive methods used in the identification of hot and cold spots. The associated synergies and trade-offs among HES descriptors were examined too. From method 1, 0.26% area of the watershed was classified as cold spots and 3.18% as hot spots, whereas method 2 classified 2.42% area as cold spots and 2.36% as hot spots. Pixel-level uncertainties showed that 0.57 km2 and 6.86 km2 of the watershed were consistently under cold and hot spots, respectively, using method 1, whereas method 2 identified 2.30 km2 and 6.97 km2 as cold spots and hot spots, respectively. The spatial analysis of hot spots showed consistent patterns in certain parts of the watershed, primarily in the south to southwest region, while cold spots were mainly found on the eastern side. Upon analyzing HES descriptors within broad ecosystem service categories, hot spots were mainly in the southern part, and cold spots were scattered throughout the watershed, especially in agricultural and scrubland areas. The significant synergistic relation between LATQ and WYLD, and sediment retention and WYLD and trade-offs between SURFQ and HES descriptors like WYLD, LATQ, sediment retention, and TWR was attributed to varying factors such as land use and topography impacting the water balance components in the watershed. The findings underscore the critical need for targeted conservation efforts to maintain the ecologically sensitive regions at watershed scale.
format Journal Article
id CGSpace158328
institution CGIAR Consortium
language Inglés
publishDate 2024
publishDateRange 2024
publishDateSort 2024
publisher MDPI
publisherStr MDPI
record_format dspace
spelling CGSpace1583282025-12-08T10:29:22Z Identifying conservation priority areas of hydrological ecosystem service using hot and cold spot analysis at watershed scale Gwal, S. Sena, Dipaka Ranjan Srivastava, P. K. Srivastava, S. K. forest ecosystems hydrological factors ecosystem services watersheds water yield crop yield sediment yield runoff land use indicators Hydrological Ecosystem Services (HES) are crucial components of environmental sustainability and provide indispensable benefits. The present study identifies critical hot and cold spots areas of HES in the Aglar watershed of the Indian Himalayan Region using six HES descriptors, namely water yield (WYLD), crop yield factor (CYF), sediment yield (SYLD), base flow (LATQ), surface runoff (SURFQ), and total water retention (TWR). The analysis was conducted using weightage-based approaches under two methods: (1) evaluating six HES descriptors individually and (2) grouping them into broad ecosystem service categories. Furthermore, the study assessed pixel-level uncertainties that arose because of the distinctive methods used in the identification of hot and cold spots. The associated synergies and trade-offs among HES descriptors were examined too. From method 1, 0.26% area of the watershed was classified as cold spots and 3.18% as hot spots, whereas method 2 classified 2.42% area as cold spots and 2.36% as hot spots. Pixel-level uncertainties showed that 0.57 km2 and 6.86 km2 of the watershed were consistently under cold and hot spots, respectively, using method 1, whereas method 2 identified 2.30 km2 and 6.97 km2 as cold spots and hot spots, respectively. The spatial analysis of hot spots showed consistent patterns in certain parts of the watershed, primarily in the south to southwest region, while cold spots were mainly found on the eastern side. Upon analyzing HES descriptors within broad ecosystem service categories, hot spots were mainly in the southern part, and cold spots were scattered throughout the watershed, especially in agricultural and scrubland areas. The significant synergistic relation between LATQ and WYLD, and sediment retention and WYLD and trade-offs between SURFQ and HES descriptors like WYLD, LATQ, sediment retention, and TWR was attributed to varying factors such as land use and topography impacting the water balance components in the watershed. The findings underscore the critical need for targeted conservation efforts to maintain the ecologically sensitive regions at watershed scale. 2024-09-13 2024-10-31T11:26:26Z 2024-10-31T11:26:26Z Journal Article https://hdl.handle.net/10568/158328 en Open Access MDPI Gwal, S.; Sena, Dipaka Ranjan; Srivastava, P. K.; Srivastava, S. K. 2024. Identifying conservation priority areas of hydrological ecosystem service using hot and cold spot analysis at watershed scale. Remote Sensing, 16(18):3409. (Special issue: Application of Remote Sensing and Spatial Analysis for Environmental Management in the Global South) [doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16183409]
spellingShingle forest ecosystems
hydrological factors
ecosystem services
watersheds
water yield
crop yield
sediment yield
runoff
land use
indicators
Gwal, S.
Sena, Dipaka Ranjan
Srivastava, P. K.
Srivastava, S. K.
Identifying conservation priority areas of hydrological ecosystem service using hot and cold spot analysis at watershed scale
title Identifying conservation priority areas of hydrological ecosystem service using hot and cold spot analysis at watershed scale
title_full Identifying conservation priority areas of hydrological ecosystem service using hot and cold spot analysis at watershed scale
title_fullStr Identifying conservation priority areas of hydrological ecosystem service using hot and cold spot analysis at watershed scale
title_full_unstemmed Identifying conservation priority areas of hydrological ecosystem service using hot and cold spot analysis at watershed scale
title_short Identifying conservation priority areas of hydrological ecosystem service using hot and cold spot analysis at watershed scale
title_sort identifying conservation priority areas of hydrological ecosystem service using hot and cold spot analysis at watershed scale
topic forest ecosystems
hydrological factors
ecosystem services
watersheds
water yield
crop yield
sediment yield
runoff
land use
indicators
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/158328
work_keys_str_mv AT gwals identifyingconservationpriorityareasofhydrologicalecosystemserviceusinghotandcoldspotanalysisatwatershedscale
AT senadipakaranjan identifyingconservationpriorityareasofhydrologicalecosystemserviceusinghotandcoldspotanalysisatwatershedscale
AT srivastavapk identifyingconservationpriorityareasofhydrologicalecosystemserviceusinghotandcoldspotanalysisatwatershedscale
AT srivastavask identifyingconservationpriorityareasofhydrologicalecosystemserviceusinghotandcoldspotanalysisatwatershedscale