Are the welfare losses from imperfect targeting important?
The authors evaluate the size of the welfare losses from using alternative “imperfect” welfare indicators as substitutes for the conventionally preferred consumption indicator. They find that whereas the undercoverage and leakage welfare indices always suggest substantial losses, and the poverty ind...
| Autores principales: | , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Brief |
| Lenguaje: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
International Food Policy Research Institute
2002
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/158120 |
Ejemplares similares: Are the welfare losses from imperfect targeting important?
- Are the welfare losses from imperfect targeting important?
- On the targeting and redistributive efficiencies of alternative transfer instruments
- On the targeting and redistributive efficiencies of alternative transfer instruments
- On the targeting and redistributive efficiencies of alternative transfer instruments
- Commodity taxation and social welfare: the generalized Ramsey Rule
- Market Access, Welfare, and Nutrition: Evidence from Ethiopia