Institutional options for managing rangelands
This brief considers the benefits and costs of alternative tenure and institutional arrangements and the impact of existing legal and policy frameworks on the sustainability and equity of pastoral production systems under three categories of landownership: (1) state ownership; (2) individual ownersh...
| Autores principales: | , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Brief |
| Lenguaje: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
International Food Policy Research Institute
2004
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/157492 |
| _version_ | 1855533788675702784 |
|---|---|
| author | Ngaido, Tidiane McCarthy, Nancy |
| author_browse | McCarthy, Nancy Ngaido, Tidiane |
| author_facet | Ngaido, Tidiane McCarthy, Nancy |
| author_sort | Ngaido, Tidiane |
| collection | Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace) |
| description | This brief considers the benefits and costs of alternative tenure and institutional arrangements and the impact of existing legal and policy frameworks on the sustainability and equity of pastoral production systems under three categories of landownership: (1) state ownership; (2) individual ownership; and (3) common property... Achieving efficient, equitable, and sustainable rangeland management depends on the costs and benefits of alternative systems. These costs and benefits, in turn, depend on agroecological, sociocultural, and economic characteristics. The conservation and management of rangelands require not only tenure security, but also an understanding of local livestock production and risk management strategies and factors that promote collective action, which can then be integrated into national policy formulation strategies and project designs. -- from Text. |
| format | Brief |
| id | CGSpace157492 |
| institution | CGIAR Consortium |
| language | Inglés |
| publishDate | 2004 |
| publishDateRange | 2004 |
| publishDateSort | 2004 |
| publisher | International Food Policy Research Institute |
| publisherStr | International Food Policy Research Institute |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | CGSpace1574922025-02-24T06:45:58Z Institutional options for managing rangelands Ngaido, Tidiane McCarthy, Nancy property rights public goods poverty alleviation common property collective action land tenure pastoralism rangelands grasslands management sustainability livestock management public ownership private ownership collective ownership This brief considers the benefits and costs of alternative tenure and institutional arrangements and the impact of existing legal and policy frameworks on the sustainability and equity of pastoral production systems under three categories of landownership: (1) state ownership; (2) individual ownership; and (3) common property... Achieving efficient, equitable, and sustainable rangeland management depends on the costs and benefits of alternative systems. These costs and benefits, in turn, depend on agroecological, sociocultural, and economic characteristics. The conservation and management of rangelands require not only tenure security, but also an understanding of local livestock production and risk management strategies and factors that promote collective action, which can then be integrated into national policy formulation strategies and project designs. -- from Text. 2004 2024-10-24T12:50:14Z 2024-10-24T12:50:14Z Brief https://hdl.handle.net/10568/157492 en https://hdl.handle.net/10568/157493 Open Access application/pdf International Food Policy Research Institute Ngaido, Tidiane; McCarthy, Nancy. 2004. Institutional options for managing rangelands. 2020 Vision Focus Brief. 11(9). In Collective action and property rights for sustainable development. 2020 Vision Focus 11. https://hdl.handle.net/10568/157492 |
| spellingShingle | property rights public goods poverty alleviation common property collective action land tenure pastoralism rangelands grasslands management sustainability livestock management public ownership private ownership collective ownership Ngaido, Tidiane McCarthy, Nancy Institutional options for managing rangelands |
| title | Institutional options for managing rangelands |
| title_full | Institutional options for managing rangelands |
| title_fullStr | Institutional options for managing rangelands |
| title_full_unstemmed | Institutional options for managing rangelands |
| title_short | Institutional options for managing rangelands |
| title_sort | institutional options for managing rangelands |
| topic | property rights public goods poverty alleviation common property collective action land tenure pastoralism rangelands grasslands management sustainability livestock management public ownership private ownership collective ownership |
| url | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/157492 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT ngaidotidiane institutionaloptionsformanagingrangelands AT mccarthynancy institutionaloptionsformanagingrangelands |