Socio-economic differentials in child stunting are consistently larger in urban than rural areas: analysis of 10 DHS data sets

Urban–rural comparisons of childhood undernutrition suggest that urban populations are better off than rural populations. However, these comparisons could mask the large differentials that exist between socio-economic groups in urban areas. Data from the Demographic and Health Surveys for 11 countri...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Menon, Purnima, Ruel, Marie T., Morris, Saul Sutkover
Format: Journal Article
Language:Inglés
Published: United Nations University 2000
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/156498
_version_ 1855541875459489792
author Menon, Purnima
Ruel, Marie T.
Morris, Saul Sutkover
author_browse Menon, Purnima
Morris, Saul Sutkover
Ruel, Marie T.
author_facet Menon, Purnima
Ruel, Marie T.
Morris, Saul Sutkover
author_sort Menon, Purnima
collection Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace)
description Urban–rural comparisons of childhood undernutrition suggest that urban populations are better off than rural populations. However, these comparisons could mask the large differentials that exist between socio-economic groups in urban areas. Data from the Demographic and Health Surveys for 11 countries from three regions were used to test the hypothesis that intra-urban differentials in child stunting are greater than intra-rural differentials, and that the prevalence of stunting among the urban and the rural poor is equally high. A socio-economic status (SES) index based on household assets, housing quality, and availability of services was created separately for rural and urban areas of each country, using principal components analysis. Odds ratios (OR) were computed to estimate the magnitude of differentials in stunting (height-for-age Z scores < −2) between urban and rural areas and between the lowest and highest SES quintiles within areas. The prevalence of stunting was lower in urban than in rural areas for all countries, but rural–urban odds ratios were relatively small (< 3.3). As hypothesized, the gap between low and high SES was markedly larger in urban (median OR, 4) than rural (median OR, 1.8) areas, and differentials were statistically significant (interaction between area and SES in logistic regression) in all but three countries. Within-urban ORs as high as 10 were found in Peru and the Dominican Republic, whereas within-rural ORs were smaller than 3.5, except in Brazil. In most countries, stunting in the poorest urban quintile was almost the same as that among poor rural dwellers. Thus, malnutrition in urban areas continues to be of concern, and effective targeting of nutrition programmes to the poorest segments of the urban population will be critical to their success and cost-effectiveness.
format Journal Article
id CGSpace156498
institution CGIAR Consortium
language Inglés
publishDate 2000
publishDateRange 2000
publishDateSort 2000
publisher United Nations University
publisherStr United Nations University
record_format dspace
spelling CGSpace1564982024-10-25T01:17:21Z Socio-economic differentials in child stunting are consistently larger in urban than rural areas: analysis of 10 DHS data sets Menon, Purnima Ruel, Marie T. Morris, Saul Sutkover rural urban relations stunting socioeconomic status surveys malnutrition growth urban health rural conditions rural areas urban areas Urban–rural comparisons of childhood undernutrition suggest that urban populations are better off than rural populations. However, these comparisons could mask the large differentials that exist between socio-economic groups in urban areas. Data from the Demographic and Health Surveys for 11 countries from three regions were used to test the hypothesis that intra-urban differentials in child stunting are greater than intra-rural differentials, and that the prevalence of stunting among the urban and the rural poor is equally high. A socio-economic status (SES) index based on household assets, housing quality, and availability of services was created separately for rural and urban areas of each country, using principal components analysis. Odds ratios (OR) were computed to estimate the magnitude of differentials in stunting (height-for-age Z scores < −2) between urban and rural areas and between the lowest and highest SES quintiles within areas. The prevalence of stunting was lower in urban than in rural areas for all countries, but rural–urban odds ratios were relatively small (< 3.3). As hypothesized, the gap between low and high SES was markedly larger in urban (median OR, 4) than rural (median OR, 1.8) areas, and differentials were statistically significant (interaction between area and SES in logistic regression) in all but three countries. Within-urban ORs as high as 10 were found in Peru and the Dominican Republic, whereas within-rural ORs were smaller than 3.5, except in Brazil. In most countries, stunting in the poorest urban quintile was almost the same as that among poor rural dwellers. Thus, malnutrition in urban areas continues to be of concern, and effective targeting of nutrition programmes to the poorest segments of the urban population will be critical to their success and cost-effectiveness. 2000-01 2024-10-24T12:44:23Z 2024-10-24T12:44:23Z Journal Article https://hdl.handle.net/10568/156498 en Limited Access application/pdf United Nations University Menon, Purnima; Ruel, Marie T.; Morris, Saul Sutkover. 2000. Socio-economic differentials in child stunting are consistently larger in urban than rural areas: analysis of 10 DHS data sets. Food and Nutrition Bulletin 21(3): 282-289. https://doi.org/10.1177/156482650002100306
spellingShingle rural urban relations
stunting
socioeconomic status
surveys
malnutrition
growth
urban health
rural conditions
rural areas
urban areas
Menon, Purnima
Ruel, Marie T.
Morris, Saul Sutkover
Socio-economic differentials in child stunting are consistently larger in urban than rural areas: analysis of 10 DHS data sets
title Socio-economic differentials in child stunting are consistently larger in urban than rural areas: analysis of 10 DHS data sets
title_full Socio-economic differentials in child stunting are consistently larger in urban than rural areas: analysis of 10 DHS data sets
title_fullStr Socio-economic differentials in child stunting are consistently larger in urban than rural areas: analysis of 10 DHS data sets
title_full_unstemmed Socio-economic differentials in child stunting are consistently larger in urban than rural areas: analysis of 10 DHS data sets
title_short Socio-economic differentials in child stunting are consistently larger in urban than rural areas: analysis of 10 DHS data sets
title_sort socio economic differentials in child stunting are consistently larger in urban than rural areas analysis of 10 dhs data sets
topic rural urban relations
stunting
socioeconomic status
surveys
malnutrition
growth
urban health
rural conditions
rural areas
urban areas
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/156498
work_keys_str_mv AT menonpurnima socioeconomicdifferentialsinchildstuntingareconsistentlylargerinurbanthanruralareasanalysisof10dhsdatasets
AT ruelmariet socioeconomicdifferentialsinchildstuntingareconsistentlylargerinurbanthanruralareasanalysisof10dhsdatasets
AT morrissaulsutkover socioeconomicdifferentialsinchildstuntingareconsistentlylargerinurbanthanruralareasanalysisof10dhsdatasets