Animal health and the role of communities: an example of trypanasomosis control options in Uganda

In many African countries, governments are re-thinking the role of the state in centrally providing certain goods and services. The rights and responsibilities for providing various public goods are being decentralized to lower levels of government administration, and/or being devolved directly to l...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McCarthy, Nancy, McDermott, John, Coleman, Paul
Formato: Artículo preliminar
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: International Food Policy Research Institute 2003
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/156475
_version_ 1855521398185787392
author McCarthy, Nancy
McDermott, John
Coleman, Paul
author_browse Coleman, Paul
McCarthy, Nancy
McDermott, John
author_facet McCarthy, Nancy
McDermott, John
Coleman, Paul
author_sort McCarthy, Nancy
collection Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace)
description In many African countries, governments are re-thinking the role of the state in centrally providing certain goods and services. The rights and responsibilities for providing various public goods are being decentralized to lower levels of government administration, and/or being devolved directly to local citizens or user groups themselves. It is thus critical to ask: under what circumstances will local groups provide the socially optimal level of the public good? In this paper, we apply this question to the case of controlling an important vector-borne livestock disease in Uganda, trypanosomosis, which is transmitted by the tsetse fly. We investigate the underlying epidemiology of transmission and different options for control, and the implications for group provision of control, within the framework of a game-theoretic model. Results indicate that individual incentives to uptake tsetse and trypanosomosis control differ widely across different control methods. Since the costs of successfully implementing collective action are affected by individual incentives to participate in collective action, the model predicts which method/s are likely to be successfully implemented at the community level. More broadly, the model highlights under what circumstances community-provision is not likely to be optimal, depending on the underlying epidemiology of the disease, technological parameters, prevailing market characteristics, and socio-cultural conditions.
format Artículo preliminar
id CGSpace156475
institution CGIAR Consortium
language Inglés
publishDate 2003
publishDateRange 2003
publishDateSort 2003
publisher International Food Policy Research Institute
publisherStr International Food Policy Research Institute
record_format dspace
spelling CGSpace1564752025-11-06T05:50:28Z Animal health and the role of communities: an example of trypanasomosis control options in Uganda McCarthy, Nancy McDermott, John Coleman, Paul animal health diseases epidemics state intervention livestock trypanosomosis glossina social norms social networks cooperative activities In many African countries, governments are re-thinking the role of the state in centrally providing certain goods and services. The rights and responsibilities for providing various public goods are being decentralized to lower levels of government administration, and/or being devolved directly to local citizens or user groups themselves. It is thus critical to ask: under what circumstances will local groups provide the socially optimal level of the public good? In this paper, we apply this question to the case of controlling an important vector-borne livestock disease in Uganda, trypanosomosis, which is transmitted by the tsetse fly. We investigate the underlying epidemiology of transmission and different options for control, and the implications for group provision of control, within the framework of a game-theoretic model. Results indicate that individual incentives to uptake tsetse and trypanosomosis control differ widely across different control methods. Since the costs of successfully implementing collective action are affected by individual incentives to participate in collective action, the model predicts which method/s are likely to be successfully implemented at the community level. More broadly, the model highlights under what circumstances community-provision is not likely to be optimal, depending on the underlying epidemiology of the disease, technological parameters, prevailing market characteristics, and socio-cultural conditions. 2003 2024-10-24T12:44:17Z 2024-10-24T12:44:17Z Working Paper https://hdl.handle.net/10568/156475 en Open Access application/pdf International Food Policy Research Institute McCarthy, Nancy; McDermott, John; Coleman, Paul. 2003. Animal health and the role of communities: an example of trypanasomosis control options in Uganda. EPTD Discussion Paper 103. https://hdl.handle.net/10568/156475
spellingShingle animal health
diseases
epidemics
state intervention
livestock
trypanosomosis
glossina
social norms
social networks
cooperative activities
McCarthy, Nancy
McDermott, John
Coleman, Paul
Animal health and the role of communities: an example of trypanasomosis control options in Uganda
title Animal health and the role of communities: an example of trypanasomosis control options in Uganda
title_full Animal health and the role of communities: an example of trypanasomosis control options in Uganda
title_fullStr Animal health and the role of communities: an example of trypanasomosis control options in Uganda
title_full_unstemmed Animal health and the role of communities: an example of trypanasomosis control options in Uganda
title_short Animal health and the role of communities: an example of trypanasomosis control options in Uganda
title_sort animal health and the role of communities an example of trypanasomosis control options in uganda
topic animal health
diseases
epidemics
state intervention
livestock
trypanosomosis
glossina
social norms
social networks
cooperative activities
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/156475
work_keys_str_mv AT mccarthynancy animalhealthandtheroleofcommunitiesanexampleoftrypanasomosiscontroloptionsinuganda
AT mcdermottjohn animalhealthandtheroleofcommunitiesanexampleoftrypanasomosiscontroloptionsinuganda
AT colemanpaul animalhealthandtheroleofcommunitiesanexampleoftrypanasomosiscontroloptionsinuganda