Research returns redux: a meta-analysis of the returns to agricultural R&D

A total of 289 studies of returns to agricultural R&D were compiled and these provide 1821 estimates of rates of return. After removing statistical outliers and incomplete observations, across the remaining 1128 observations the estimated annual rates of return averaged 65 per cent overall — 80 per...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alston, Julian M., Marra, Michele C., Pardey, Philip G., Wyatt, T. J.
Format: Journal Article
Language:Inglés
Published: Wiley 2000
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/156398
_version_ 1855514701909196800
author Alston, Julian M.
Marra, Michele C.
Pardey, Philip G.
Wyatt, T. J.
author_browse Alston, Julian M.
Marra, Michele C.
Pardey, Philip G.
Wyatt, T. J.
author_facet Alston, Julian M.
Marra, Michele C.
Pardey, Philip G.
Wyatt, T. J.
author_sort Alston, Julian M.
collection Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace)
description A total of 289 studies of returns to agricultural R&D were compiled and these provide 1821 estimates of rates of return. After removing statistical outliers and incomplete observations, across the remaining 1128 observations the estimated annual rates of return averaged 65 per cent overall — 80 per cent for research only, 80 per cent for extension only, and 47 per cent for research and extension combined. These averages reveal little meaningful information from a large body of literature, which provides rate‐of‐return estimates that are often not directly comparable. This study was aimed at trying to account for the differences. Several features of the methods used by research evaluators matter, in particular assumptions about lag lengths and the nature of the research‐induced supply shift.
format Journal Article
id CGSpace156398
institution CGIAR Consortium
language Inglés
publishDate 2000
publishDateRange 2000
publishDateSort 2000
publisher Wiley
publisherStr Wiley
record_format dspace
spelling CGSpace1563982024-10-24T12:44:01Z Research returns redux: a meta-analysis of the returns to agricultural R&D Alston, Julian M. Marra, Michele C. Pardey, Philip G. Wyatt, T. J. agriculture A total of 289 studies of returns to agricultural R&D were compiled and these provide 1821 estimates of rates of return. After removing statistical outliers and incomplete observations, across the remaining 1128 observations the estimated annual rates of return averaged 65 per cent overall — 80 per cent for research only, 80 per cent for extension only, and 47 per cent for research and extension combined. These averages reveal little meaningful information from a large body of literature, which provides rate‐of‐return estimates that are often not directly comparable. This study was aimed at trying to account for the differences. Several features of the methods used by research evaluators matter, in particular assumptions about lag lengths and the nature of the research‐induced supply shift. 2000-06 2024-10-24T12:44:01Z 2024-10-24T12:44:01Z Journal Article https://hdl.handle.net/10568/156398 en Limited Access Wiley Alston, Julian M.; Marra, Michele C.; Pardey, Philip; Wyatt, T. J. 2000. Research returns redux: a meta-analysis of the returns to agricultural R&D. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 44(2): 185-215. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8489.00107
spellingShingle agriculture
Alston, Julian M.
Marra, Michele C.
Pardey, Philip G.
Wyatt, T. J.
Research returns redux: a meta-analysis of the returns to agricultural R&D
title Research returns redux: a meta-analysis of the returns to agricultural R&D
title_full Research returns redux: a meta-analysis of the returns to agricultural R&D
title_fullStr Research returns redux: a meta-analysis of the returns to agricultural R&D
title_full_unstemmed Research returns redux: a meta-analysis of the returns to agricultural R&D
title_short Research returns redux: a meta-analysis of the returns to agricultural R&D
title_sort research returns redux a meta analysis of the returns to agricultural r d
topic agriculture
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/156398
work_keys_str_mv AT alstonjulianm researchreturnsreduxametaanalysisofthereturnstoagriculturalrd
AT marramichelec researchreturnsreduxametaanalysisofthereturnstoagriculturalrd
AT pardeyphilipg researchreturnsreduxametaanalysisofthereturnstoagriculturalrd
AT wyatttj researchreturnsreduxametaanalysisofthereturnstoagriculturalrd