Land dispute resolution in Mozambique: institutions and evidence of agroforestry technology adoption

Successful adoption of natural resource management technologies requires that important fundamentals of property rights be established. Because disputes over property rights occur universally, the ability to successfully defend one's rights to property exercises a central influence on the tenure sec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Unruh, Jon D.
Formato: Artículo preliminar
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: International Food Policy Research Institute 2001
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/156124
_version_ 1855516279564140544
author Unruh, Jon D.
author_browse Unruh, Jon D.
author_facet Unruh, Jon D.
author_sort Unruh, Jon D.
collection Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace)
description Successful adoption of natural resource management technologies requires that important fundamentals of property rights be established. Because disputes over property rights occur universally, the ability to successfully defend one's rights to property exercises a central influence on the tenure security necessary for technology adoption. However, defending rights to property rests upon the possession of evidence that is readily available and widely regarded as legitimate. This paper presents work carried out in postwar Mozambique on the availability and legitimacy of evidence pertaining to land tenure dispute resolution. What is unusual about the Mozambique case is that the physical presence of a natural resource management technology -agroforestry trees in this case - also serves as one of the most widely available and legitimate forms of evidence in the postwar period. Such an arrangement reveals important aspects about the reverse relationship between property rights and technology adoption. While such an evidence role for a technology may at first appear to encourage further adoption of agroforestry, important influences on property rights in the postwar setting serve to discourage full adoption and jeopardize the long-term presence of existing agroforestry trees. It remains to be seen if recent legislative changes regarding property rights will successfully engage customary forms of evidence and encourage full adoption of agroforestry in Mozambique.
format Artículo preliminar
id CGSpace156124
institution CGIAR Consortium
language Inglés
publishDate 2001
publishDateRange 2001
publishDateSort 2001
publisher International Food Policy Research Institute
publisherStr International Food Policy Research Institute
record_format dspace
spelling CGSpace1561242025-01-10T06:37:47Z Land dispute resolution in Mozambique: institutions and evidence of agroforestry technology adoption Unruh, Jon D. conflict management natural resources management resource management ownership technology transfer tenure agroforestry multiple use land Successful adoption of natural resource management technologies requires that important fundamentals of property rights be established. Because disputes over property rights occur universally, the ability to successfully defend one's rights to property exercises a central influence on the tenure security necessary for technology adoption. However, defending rights to property rests upon the possession of evidence that is readily available and widely regarded as legitimate. This paper presents work carried out in postwar Mozambique on the availability and legitimacy of evidence pertaining to land tenure dispute resolution. What is unusual about the Mozambique case is that the physical presence of a natural resource management technology -agroforestry trees in this case - also serves as one of the most widely available and legitimate forms of evidence in the postwar period. Such an arrangement reveals important aspects about the reverse relationship between property rights and technology adoption. While such an evidence role for a technology may at first appear to encourage further adoption of agroforestry, important influences on property rights in the postwar setting serve to discourage full adoption and jeopardize the long-term presence of existing agroforestry trees. It remains to be seen if recent legislative changes regarding property rights will successfully engage customary forms of evidence and encourage full adoption of agroforestry in Mozambique. 2001 2024-10-24T12:43:16Z 2024-10-24T12:43:16Z Working Paper https://hdl.handle.net/10568/156124 en Open Access application/pdf International Food Policy Research Institute Unruh, Jon D. 2001. Land dispute resolution in Mozambique: institutions and evidence of agroforestry technology adoption. CAPRi working paper 0012. https://hdl.handle.net/10568/156124
spellingShingle conflict management
natural resources management
resource management
ownership
technology transfer
tenure
agroforestry
multiple use
land
Unruh, Jon D.
Land dispute resolution in Mozambique: institutions and evidence of agroforestry technology adoption
title Land dispute resolution in Mozambique: institutions and evidence of agroforestry technology adoption
title_full Land dispute resolution in Mozambique: institutions and evidence of agroforestry technology adoption
title_fullStr Land dispute resolution in Mozambique: institutions and evidence of agroforestry technology adoption
title_full_unstemmed Land dispute resolution in Mozambique: institutions and evidence of agroforestry technology adoption
title_short Land dispute resolution in Mozambique: institutions and evidence of agroforestry technology adoption
title_sort land dispute resolution in mozambique institutions and evidence of agroforestry technology adoption
topic conflict management
natural resources management
resource management
ownership
technology transfer
tenure
agroforestry
multiple use
land
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/156124
work_keys_str_mv AT unruhjond landdisputeresolutioninmozambiqueinstitutionsandevidenceofagroforestrytechnologyadoption